Advertisement

LoganCrunching: Wolverine Numbers on Decline After Yearly High?

Discuss the latest comic book news and front page articles, read or post your own reviews of comics, and talk about anything comic book related. Threads from the two subforums below will also show up here. News Stand topics can also be read and posted in from The Asylum.

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

LOLtron
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 26064
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 362 posts
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 1:54 pm


LoganCrunching: Wolverine Numbers on Decline After Yearly High?

Postby LOLtron » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:06 pm

LoganCrunching: Wolverine Numbers on Decline After Yearly High?

The number of times Wolverine was mentioned in the Marvel solicits is only 50 this month, down one from last month's high of 51.



Source: Marvel Full Monthly Solicitations

Wolverine mentions, which normally total around 30 on an average month in Marvel's monthly solicitations, hit an all time high (for the year we've been tracking them) last month with 51 total mentions. While the surly mutant's Mary Sue qualities and position as the moral center of the Marvel Universe put him in a unique position to grow and maintain such a large solicit share, the drop of one mention is worrying. This month there are only 50 mentions of Wolverine, which, while not indicating a significant downward trend, is worrisome in that it could mean that Wolverine growth has leveled off.

Of the various mentions Wolverine receives in the solicits, forty-three of them are in relation to books where Wolverine is the title character, with thirteen of those mentions belonging to Wolverine-centric comics (and a Wolverine young readers prose novel), and thirty belonging to trade paperbacks and hardcovers, like the Wolverine Index to the Wolverine Universe. Four of the mentions are for Wolverine guest appearances in non-Wolverine-centric books, though of course Wolverine can always pop up unannounced in a title. The remaining three mentions are credits for writers working on other books in order to entice readers to buy non-Wolverine books based on the idea that a creator once wrote or drew Wolverine.

Some might suggest that the failure to show growth in the April solicits is the fault of Marvel's creative talent for not coming up with enough ways to shoehorn Wolverine into unrelated Marvel titles, but The Outhouse believes that blame for this alarming downward shift lies solely at the feet of the readers. After all, if you weren't buying so many comics with Wolverine in them in the first place, Marvel would never have been led to believe that the market could sustain fifteen Wolverine-centric titles while the character made guest appearances in multiple other books. Now that Marvel has given the readers what they asked for, it's our responsibility to purchase those books and drive Wolverine appearances to new heights.

Things aren't all bad. In one year of Wolverine mentions (May 2012 to April 2013), there are 342 Wolverine mentions, nearly one Wolverine mention per day of the year, or .93 Wolverine mentions per day, which is close enough for government work. The average number of Wolverine mentions from April 2012 to April 2013 is 28, with a standard deviation of just over 11. Wolverine mentions in Marvel solicitations remain within 3 Sigma compliance. The Wolverine mentions market is clearly still quite strong, but we think we can do better if we pull together as a fandom and recognize that Wolverine is the greatest character ever created, and he deserves to be the focal point of every comic Marvel puts out.

The Outhouse hopes to see at least 70 mentions of Wolverine in the May solicitations from Marvel, so be sure to get out there this month and buy two copies of every book with Wolverine in it.









Written or Contributed by Jude Terror




READ THIS ARTICLE ON THE FRONT PAGE, HUMANS!
Image

Advertisement

GHERU
User avatar


YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 39745
Likes: 312 posts
Liked in: 489 posts
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: LoganCrunching: Wolverine Numbers on Decline After Yearl

Postby GHERU » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:24 pm

:lol:
RUviews
Benderbrau wrote:Welcome to the Outhouse. Where civility means you're doing it wrong.

Image

misac
User avatar
Outhouse Editor
 
Posts: 35415
Likes: 407 posts
Liked in: 265 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:49 pm
Location: {nomultithumb}


Re: LoganCrunching: Wolverine Numbers on Decline After Yearl

Postby misac » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:43 pm

:lol:

I'd forgotten the movie was coming out.
Image

DMM
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 23820
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 4 posts
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Philly
Title: Former Twenty Something
Formerly: DeathMetalMetrosexual


Re: LoganCrunching: Wolverine Numbers on Decline After Yearl

Postby DMM » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:56 pm

That is frigging awesome. You should put together an online powerpoint presentation.

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 34528
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 109 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Title: This guy, right?


Re: LoganCrunching: Wolverine Numbers on Decline After Yearl

Postby Punchy » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:56 pm

This is an outrage!

IvCNuB4
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 11693
Likes: 835 posts
Liked in: 559 posts
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:51 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Title: Stop messing with my TITLE !


Re: LoganCrunching: Wolverine Numbers on Decline After Yearl

Postby IvCNuB4 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:14 pm

:lol:
Yeah, Daddy. Eat that juicy sausage :twisted:
Victorian Squid wrote:In a DC/Marvel cross-over "all your favorite Marvel characters would catch contextually-transmitted diseases and Steph infections."

leave a comment with facebook


Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests

Advertisement