Monday, September 26, 2016 • Morning Edition • "Ban Herald ASAP!"

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!

Advertisement

First Look at Ginny Weasley as Mary Jane Watson in Amazing Spider-Man 2

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

User avatar

habitual

Silly French Man

Postby habitual » Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:48 am

Anything that can overshadow Andrew Garfield's shitty Spider-man can only be good for the film.

Hab
User avatar

Keb

<( ' . ' )>

Postby Keb » Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:56 am

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:How many of you could do better? :P

I think she looks fine. Like a normal girl. Watch less porn.

Like winterfolk "fine" or summerfolk "fyne! (mmhmm!)"?
User avatar

holtom2000

dINGO

Postby holtom2000 » Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:57 am

bkthomson wrote:This is just a not very flattering picture of her. Look her up on IMDB she is not as extremely attractive as Emma Stone but she is attractive.

I agree. She's cute. Little Ginny, all grown up...
Hmm, time for a Harry Potter marathon?
User avatar

bkthomson

Rain Partier

Postby bkthomson » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:06 pm

holtom2000 wrote:I agree. She's cute. Little Ginny, all grown up...
Hmm, time for a Harry Potter marathon?


Its not Ginny though. . . that is the joke to the article.
User avatar

bkthomson

Rain Partier

Postby bkthomson » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:06 pm

jaxstraww wrote:I rather see J Lo as MJ.....

No idea what they are thinking here........while super hot is not needed this is a poor choice for that character. Why not cast melissa mccarthy if we are looking for great personality.

Sent from my SPH-M930BST using Tapatalk 2


Get. Help. Now. :P
User avatar

MrBlack

WTF is this rank?

Postby MrBlack » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:11 pm

bkthomson wrote:
Its not Ginny though. . . that is the joke to the article.

Yeah.

It's actually Ron in drag.
User avatar

Grayson

Outhouse Drafter

Postby Grayson » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:12 pm

Damn, now I am a little disappointed that the actual actress who played Ginny Weasley, Bonnie Wright isn't playing Mary Jane. :-(

In any case, Shailene Woodley may not be anybody's first choice to play Mary Jane but at least she is better looking than Kirsten Dunst. Now all we have to do is hope that Shailene can play a better Mary Jane and honestly, that shouldn't be too hard. All she has to do is have more than 2 emotions and she'll surpass snaggletooth on the acting front as well.
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:24 pm

Not a single one of you would turn down Kirsten Dunst.
User avatar

superfictious

Humuhumunukunukuapuaa

Postby superfictious » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:26 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:Not a single one of you would turn down Kirsten Dunst.


Hawtness ain't a prerequisite to fuckability.
User avatar

Grayson

Outhouse Drafter

Postby Grayson » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:28 pm

jaxstraww wrote:Once you see that white webbing against her olive skin......you will start to agree with me and hate yourself for even doubting my casting calls.


:smt011

J-Lo is simply one step above a Kardashian. I don't know how she did it but unlike the Kardashians she was actually able to convince some people that she had something resembling talent. She doesn't but there are still a few people convinced that she does.
User avatar

Grayson

Outhouse Drafter

Postby Grayson » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:29 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:Not a single one of you would turn down Kirsten Dunst.


:smt006

I would and I actually stand by that statement.
User avatar

bkthomson

Rain Partier

Postby bkthomson » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:30 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:Not a single one of you would turn down Kirsten Dunst.

Yes I would, as she is not my wife.
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:31 pm

bkthomson wrote:Yes I would, as she is not my wife.


You know what I meant. :P
User avatar

bkthomson

Rain Partier

Postby bkthomson » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:36 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:
You know what I meant. :P

:lol:
User avatar

Keb

<( ' . ' )>

Postby Keb » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:39 pm

Grayson wrote:
:smt011

J-Lo is simply one step above a Kardashian. I don't know how she did it but unlike the Kardashians she was actually able to convince some people that she had something resembling talent. She doesn't but there are still a few people convinced that she does.

I liked her as Fly Girl #3 back in the day.

leave a comment with facebook


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fysh, Google [Bot] and 59 guests