So is Image winning? : The News Stand - Page 8 - The Outhouse

So is Image winning?

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

Rain Partier

by Wally Brando » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:34 pm

I haven't bothered to tally it up, but I'm fairly certain the season got somewhere between a 7-8 on the season, based on my recollection of the avg. score most weeks.

Also a mid-80's score from critics and users on Metacritic for the season.

Wally Brando

Rain Partier

Outhouser since: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:10 pm
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 42564
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by Wally Brando » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:34 pm

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:23 pm

Chris wrote:You sucked.

Not as much as TWD.

And relying on metacritic scores? Just proves the masses are stupid...look at how the last seasons of Ddxter and True Blood have been scoring FFS :lol:

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

Outhouser since: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: The 3040
Posts: 21881
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:23 pm

Chris wrote:You sucked.

Not as much as TWD.

And relying on metacritic scores? Just proves the masses are stupid...look at how the last seasons of Ddxter and True Blood have been scoring FFS :lol:

Wally Brando

Rain Partier

by Wally Brando » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:27 pm

fieldy snuts wrote:
Not as much as TWD.

And relying on metacritic scores? Just proves the masses are stupid...look at how the last seasons of Ddxter and True Blood have been scoring FFS

Not relying on anything, just pointing to two available scores for the show. I'm sure I could get some more. The reviews have been generally very positive for the show, and the ratings keep growing season to season.

So maybe it's just not your thing, but it seems to be doing just fine both commercially and creatively to me. Sticking your head in the sand and going "LALALA" doesn't change that fact.

Wally Brando

Rain Partier

Outhouser since: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:10 pm
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 42564
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by Wally Brando » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:27 pm

fieldy snuts wrote:
Not as much as TWD.

And relying on metacritic scores? Just proves the masses are stupid...look at how the last seasons of Ddxter and True Blood have been scoring FFS

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:33 pm

I pointed out to those becaus it proves metacritic is just a popularity contest when it comes to TV shows based on the cult followings they build up compared to movies.

Feel free to admit you're wrong any time now or continue to stick your head in the sand and take your own LALALA advice....I made my point

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

Outhouser since: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: The 3040
Posts: 21881
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:33 pm

Wally Brando

Rain Partier

by Wally Brando » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:38 pm

You are learning arguing tactics from Spektre, I see. :smt011

Wally Brando

Rain Partier

Outhouser since: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:10 pm
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 42564
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by Wally Brando » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:38 pm

You are learning arguing tactics from Spektre, I see. :smt011

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:56 pm

Chris wrote:You are learning arguing tactics from Spektre, I see.

i'm basically reflecting what you're doing back at you :lol:

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

Outhouser since: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: The 3040
Posts: 21881
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:56 pm

Chris wrote:You are learning arguing tactics from Spektre, I see.

i'm basically reflecting what you're doing back at you :lol:

habitual

Silly French Man

by habitual » Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:45 pm

Here are some numbers for you:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/04/business/media/walking-dead-helps-solidify-amcs-ratings-success.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

During its run last fall, “The Walking Dead” was the highest-rated show among viewers 18 to 49, the most-sought age group, with a bigger audience than network winners like “The Big Bang Theory,” “American Idol,” “The Voice” and “Modern Family.”

Now the zombies are back for the second half of the show’s third season, and they continue to gnaw on everything in their path, including the broadcast networks’ historical claim to being the only place to find a mass audience. Three weeks ago, the zombies owned Sunday night, attracting 7.7 million viewers in the 18 to 49 range, more than any broadcast show in the land.

Hab

habitual

Silly French Man

Outhouser since: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:41 am
Location: The Rock of Eternity
Posts: 19581
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by habitual » Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:45 pm

Here are some numbers for you:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/04/business/media/walking-dead-helps-solidify-amcs-ratings-success.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

During its run last fall, “The Walking Dead” was the highest-rated show among viewers 18 to 49, the most-sought age group, with a bigger audience than network winners like “The Big Bang Theory,” “American Idol,” “The Voice” and “Modern Family.”

Now the zombies are back for the second half of the show’s third season, and they continue to gnaw on everything in their path, including the broadcast networks’ historical claim to being the only place to find a mass audience. Three weeks ago, the zombies owned Sunday night, attracting 7.7 million viewers in the 18 to 49 range, more than any broadcast show in the land.

Hab

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:58 pm

the fact that more people watch the walking dead over breaking bad just further reinforces my point that the unwashed masses are stupid.

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

Outhouser since: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: The 3040
Posts: 21881
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:58 pm

the fact that more people watch the walking dead over breaking bad just further reinforces my point that the unwashed masses are stupid.

habitual

Silly French Man

by habitual » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:01 pm

fieldy snuts wrote:the fact that more people watch the walking dead over breaking bad just further reinforces my point that the unwashed masses are stupid.

Yes, we get it, everyone's wrong but you.

:lol:

Hab

habitual

Silly French Man

Outhouser since: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:41 am
Location: The Rock of Eternity
Posts: 19581
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by habitual » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:01 pm

fieldy snuts wrote:the fact that more people watch the walking dead over breaking bad just further reinforces my point that the unwashed masses are stupid.

Yes, we get it, everyone's wrong but you.

:lol:

Hab

Wally Brando

Rain Partier

by Wally Brando » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:05 pm

You can't really argue quality for this exact reason.

The only objective way to argue about it is with numbers.

Sure, I agree that Breaking Bad is by far a better show, but that's beside the point. TWD gets good reviews, it is often one of the most talked about shows on monday mornings, or on social media after new episodes, and gets crazy ratings. I'm sure the creators are crying themselves to sleep at night because fieldy snuts on theouthousers.com doesn't like the show. :smt102

Wally Brando

Rain Partier

Outhouser since: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:10 pm
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 42564
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by Wally Brando » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:05 pm

mrorangesoda

FROGMAN

by mrorangesoda » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:36 pm

Chris wrote:You can't really argue quality for this exact reason.

The only objective way to argue about it is with numbers.

True.

Here are some numbers:
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=45995
http://quotes.wsj.com/AMCX?mod=inlineTicker%3f
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=wanted.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avengers11.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=darkknight.htm

I don't see anywhere that Image is "winning".

You can certainly support it and enjoy the books they produce, but the rails being gone off of are getting crazy.

mrorangesoda

FROGMAN

Outhouser since: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:20 pm
Posts: 8757
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by mrorangesoda » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:36 pm

Chris wrote:You can't really argue quality for this exact reason.

The only objective way to argue about it is with numbers.

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:50 pm

habitual wrote:
Yes, we get it, everyone's wrong but you.

Hab

just you.

usually i think chris is onpoint with a lot of his posts. you on the other hand, you take ignorance to herald levels.

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

Outhouser since: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: The 3040
Posts: 21881
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:50 pm

habitual wrote:
Yes, we get it, everyone's wrong but you.

Hab

just you.

usually i think chris is onpoint with a lot of his posts. you on the other hand, you take ignorance to herald levels.

habitual

Silly French Man

by habitual » Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:21 pm

little spider-rob wrote:
just you.

usually i think chris is onpoint with a lot of his posts. you on the other hand, you take ignorance to herald levels.

Yes I must be one of the unwashed masses you're so superior too...

:lol:

Hab

habitual

Silly French Man

Outhouser since: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:41 am
Location: The Rock of Eternity
Posts: 19581
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by habitual » Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:21 pm

little spider-rob wrote:
just you.

usually i think chris is onpoint with a lot of his posts. you on the other hand, you take ignorance to herald levels.

Yes I must be one of the unwashed masses you're so superior too...

:lol:

Hab

habitual

Silly French Man

by habitual » Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:22 pm

mrorangesoda wrote:
True.

Here are some numbers:
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=45995
http://quotes.wsj.com/AMCX?mod=inlineTicker%3f
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=wanted.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avengers11.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=darkknight.htm

I don't see anywhere that Image is "winning".

You can certainly support it and enjoy the books they produce, but the rails being gone off of are getting crazy.

Where are the GN numbers?

Hab

habitual

Silly French Man

Outhouser since: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:41 am
Location: The Rock of Eternity
Posts: 19581
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by habitual » Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:22 pm

mrorangesoda wrote:
True.

Here are some numbers:
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=45995
http://quotes.wsj.com/AMCX?mod=inlineTicker%3f
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=wanted.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avengers11.htm
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=darkknight.htm

I don't see anywhere that Image is "winning".

You can certainly support it and enjoy the books they produce, but the rails being gone off of are getting crazy.

Where are the GN numbers?

Hab

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:34 pm

habitual wrote:
Yes I must be one of the unwashed masses you're so superior too...

Hab

i never said im superior. but if you want to use that word to describe me....

fieldy snuts

Rain Partier

Outhouser since: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: The 3040
Posts: 21881
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by fieldy snuts » Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:34 pm