Advertisement

Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on Inhuman

Discuss the latest comic book news and front page articles, read or post your own reviews of comics, and talk about anything comic book related. Threads from the two subforums below will also show up here. News Stand topics can also be read and posted in from The Asylum.

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

guitargod694
User avatar
Post Whore
 
Posts: 1083
Likes: 117 posts
Liked in: 98 posts
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 1:22 pm
Title: Total Spaceship Guy


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby guitargod694 » Tue Dec 17, 2013 5:47 pm

GHERU wrote:and, even then, it had better come with a free bj


Comics come with the opposite of that.
-Bill-

Advertisement

The Bass
 
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 63 posts


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby The Bass » Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:04 pm

Punchy wrote:I'm surprised The Bass isn't blaming this on Fraction writing too much pornography for Fat Bob.


I read Sex Criminals myself. I like Image when its been written by Marvel writers who do BOTH

LobsterJ
User avatar
Great Scott!!!
 
Posts: 4931
Likes: 6 posts
Liked in: 95 posts
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 4:28 pm


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby LobsterJ » Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:35 pm

The Bass wrote:
I read Sex Criminals myself. I like Image when its been written by Marvel writers who do BOTH


so you liked invincible and walking dead when fat bob was also working for marvel?

The Bass
 
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 63 posts


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby The Bass » Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:47 pm

I read Walking Dead (note: READ; I never paid for it) until Kirkman murdered the child, at which point I decided I would never read his stuff again. Probably....paid attention to what was going on in Invincible..until the girl had an abortion, and that was a good enough jump off point

I quite liked Irredeemable Ant-Man, I've no problems admitting that. I still think if he'd stayed at Marvel, biding his time, writing books that have "Cancelled in 12" written all over them , he would have built himself a respectable career to slide into creator owned stuff

S.F. Jude Terror
User avatar
OMCTO
 
Posts: 77144
Likes: 635 posts
Liked in: 1046 posts
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:44 pm
Location: Up Your Ass
Title: Webmaster Supreme
Formerly: Dr. Jude Terror


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:49 pm

The Bass wrote:I read Walking Dead (note: READ; I never paid for it) until Kirkman murdered the child, at which point I decided I would never read his stuff again. Probably....paid attention to what was going on in Invincible..until the girl had an abortion, and that was a good enough jump off point

I quite liked Irredeemable Ant-Man, I've no problems admitting that. I still think if he'd stayed at Marvel, biding his time, writing books that have "Cancelled in 12" written all over them , he would have built himself a respectable career to slide into creator owned stuff


It's too bad he threw all that away.

The Bass
 
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 63 posts


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby The Bass » Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:58 pm

I know this is hard for you to accept, but there are some people who want good writers writing the characters they grew up with.

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 34504
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 95 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Title: This guy, right?


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby Punchy » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:00 pm

The Bass wrote:
I read Sex Criminals myself. I like Image when its been written by Marvel writers who do BOTH


Yes, and Fraction leaving Inhuman is a sign that he can't do both, we're not seeing him stop Sex Criminals are we?

I want some outrage!

Come on, where's the old Bass?

The Bass
 
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 63 posts


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby The Bass » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:06 pm

Hey, there's a GREAT example: look at Charles Soule. I mean, he's taking on ....probably way too much work. Is he on a hiding to nothing with Thunderbolts and Swamp Thing? Probably. Is he complaining? No - he's doing the work to raise his profile now, which is what Kirkman should have done instead of bitching about not being allowed write Ultimate Spider-Man

syxxpakk
User avatar
Wrasslin' Fan
 
Posts: 12625
Likes: 49 posts
Liked in: 111 posts
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:13 pm
Title: The Wrasslin' Fan


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby syxxpakk » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:06 pm

I can't believe Bass still thinks THIS forum is anti-Marvel.
Image

When you're as good as Chael, you can only call out people worse than you.


@syxxpakk on the Twitter.

The Bass
 
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 63 posts


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby The Bass » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:07 pm

I have yet to see a pro-Marvel post that wasn't hijacked.

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 34504
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 95 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Title: This guy, right?


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby Punchy » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:08 pm

The Bass wrote:I have yet to see a pro-Marvel post that wasn't hijacked.


Look at every thread I post every week.

LobsterJ
User avatar
Great Scott!!!
 
Posts: 4931
Likes: 6 posts
Liked in: 95 posts
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 4:28 pm


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby LobsterJ » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:09 pm

The Bass wrote:Hey, there's a GREAT example: look at Charles Soule. I mean, he's taking on ....probably way too much work. Is he on a hiding to nothing with Thunderbolts and Swamp Thing? Probably. Is he complaining? No - he's doing the work to raise his profile now, which is what Kirkman should have done instead of bitching about not being allowed write Ultimate Spider-Man


I don't know how anybody can criticize Kirkman's approach when he is making more money than anybody at Marvel now.

syxxpakk
User avatar
Wrasslin' Fan
 
Posts: 12625
Likes: 49 posts
Liked in: 111 posts
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:13 pm
Title: The Wrasslin' Fan


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby syxxpakk » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:10 pm

The Bass wrote:I have yet to see a pro-Marvel post that wasn't hijacked.


Have you seen a pro-DC thread that hasn't been?
Image

When you're as good as Chael, you can only call out people worse than you.


@syxxpakk on the Twitter.

Grayson
User avatar
Outhouse Drafter
 
Posts: 8727
Likes: 711 posts
Liked in: 1239 posts
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:34 am
Location: The Darkest Timeline
Title: The Intersect
Formerly: Sakie


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby Grayson » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:17 pm

The Bass wrote:I have yet to see a pro-Marvel post that wasn't hijacked.


Pretty much any thread that talks about Fraction and Aja's Hawkeye or virtually any of the new X-Men material are overwhelmingly positive, even when the X-Men threads digress into conversations about which side is right. Can't really say that there are very many conversations about the current Captain America series that are not civil or constructive either. Hell, I can't think of a single Marvel thread that has been as negative as the average DC thread in quite some time.
ImageImageImage

The Bass
 
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 63 posts


Re: Marvel Shocker: Charles Soule Replaces Matt Fraction on

Postby The Bass » Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:18 pm

Punchy wrote:
Look at every thread I post every week.


OK, lets...
http://www.theouthousers.com/forum/the-news-stand/uncanny-men-coven-mutant-women-spoilers-t99127.html
"Punchy" review of Uncanny X-Men #15 (Bendis/Anka)

Holy fucking shit, the balls on Brian Michael Bendis. I can’t actually believe that he did what he did in this issue. He only went and introduced a Marvel Universe version of perhaps the worst character he ever created


http://www.theouthousers.com/forum/the-news-stand/justice-league-america-the-right-thing-spoilers-t99156.html
"Punchy" Review of Justice League of America #10

More Forever Evil fun, as Matt Kindt continues to explore Stargirl’s origin in way more detail than we probably need, but it’s all well-written and interesting stuff.


So, I think we know where your biases lie.

leave a comment with facebook

PreviousNext

Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests

Advertisement