Review Group Week 211 - X-MEN FOREVER #18 : The News Stand - Page 7 - The Outhouse

Review Group Week 211 - X-MEN FOREVER #18

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

Punchy

Staff Writer

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:57 pm

Jude, what's the point in me or Doombug doing a review when you'll insult Amlah for a pretty well-reasoned review?

We can't win here.

Punchy

Staff Writer

Outhouser since: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Posts: 35245
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:57 pm

Jude, what's the point in me or Doombug doing a review when you'll insult Amlah for a pretty well-reasoned review?

We can't win here.

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:58 pm

amlah6 wrote:If we're comparing books that we read beforehand, I also read Unwritten #4 on my lunch hour and it was freaking awesome.

Sorry I didn't like XMF, Jude. I wanted to like it because I like goofy stuff, I just didn't find it to be a good comic book.

I had just read Supergirl 50 :evil:

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

Outhouser since: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: durham, nc
Posts: 27418
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:58 pm

amlah6 wrote:If we're comparing books that we read beforehand, I also read Unwritten #4 on my lunch hour and it was freaking awesome.

Sorry I didn't like XMF, Jude. I wanted to like it because I like goofy stuff, I just didn't find it to be a good comic book.

I had just read Supergirl 50 :evil:

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:59 pm

Punchy wrote:Jude, what's the point in me or Doombug doing a review when you'll insult Amlah for a pretty well-reasoned review?

We can't win here.

I honestly think he wants people to like it. Being pushy about it isn't gonna help though. I'm glad he likes it.

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

Outhouser since: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: durham, nc
Posts: 27418
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:59 pm

Punchy wrote:Jude, what's the point in me or Doombug doing a review when you'll insult Amlah for a pretty well-reasoned review?

We can't win here.

I honestly think he wants people to like it. Being pushy about it isn't gonna help though. I'm glad he likes it.

Punchy

Staff Writer

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:59 pm

thefourthman wrote:I honestly think he wants people to like it. Being pushy about it isn't gonna help though. I'm glad he likes it.

It's having the opposite effect if anything.

Punchy

Staff Writer

Outhouser since: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Posts: 35245
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:59 pm

thefourthman wrote:I honestly think he wants people to like it. Being pushy about it isn't gonna help though. I'm glad he likes it.

It's having the opposite effect if anything.

******

by ****** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:00 pm

thefourthman wrote:I had just read Supergirl 50

I've checked BF a couple of times today to see if your review was live yet. I need to see this reasoning on how you could give the Helen Slater story an 8.

******

Likes: post
Liked in: post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by ****** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:00 pm

thefourthman wrote:I had just read Supergirl 50

I've checked BF a couple of times today to see if your review was live yet. I need to see this reasoning on how you could give the Helen Slater story an 8.

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:03 pm

amlah6 wrote:I've checked BF a couple of times today to see if your review was live yet. I need to see this reasoning on how you could give the Helen Slater story an 8.

It's simple, it isn't the mess that was the Gates story I just read. you aren't gonna see a whole lot of reason (and it goes live sometime tomorrow), I really don't talk about it.

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

Outhouser since: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: durham, nc
Posts: 27418
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:03 pm

amlah6 wrote:I've checked BF a couple of times today to see if your review was live yet. I need to see this reasoning on how you could give the Helen Slater story an 8.

It's simple, it isn't the mess that was the Gates story I just read. you aren't gonna see a whole lot of reason (and it goes live sometime tomorrow), I really don't talk about it.

Punchy

Staff Writer

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:05 pm

thefourthman wrote:It's simple, it isn't the mess that was the Gates story I just read. you aren't gonna see a whole lot of reason (and it goes live sometime tomorrow), I really don't talk about it.

The Gates story was good! The Slater back-up was pretty, but empty (like Supergirl!)

Punchy

Staff Writer

Outhouser since: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Posts: 35245
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:05 pm

thefourthman wrote:It's simple, it isn't the mess that was the Gates story I just read. you aren't gonna see a whole lot of reason (and it goes live sometime tomorrow), I really don't talk about it.

The Gates story was good! The Slater back-up was pretty, but empty (like Supergirl!)

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:06 pm

Punchy wrote:The Gates story was good! The Slater back-up was pretty, but empty (like Supergirl!)

Oh, boy, I can't wait for my review to go live... Supergirl 50 was EVERYTHING that is wrong at DC. It was almost brilliant in a meta way.

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

Outhouser since: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: durham, nc
Posts: 27418
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:06 pm

Punchy wrote:The Gates story was good! The Slater back-up was pretty, but empty (like Supergirl!)

Oh, boy, I can't wait for my review to go live... Supergirl 50 was EVERYTHING that is wrong at DC. It was almost brilliant in a meta way.

Punchy

Staff Writer

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:07 pm

thefourthman wrote:Oh, boy, I can't wait for my review to go live... Supergirl 50 was EVERYTHING that is wrong at DC. It was almost brilliant in a meta way.

But... I liked it... I thought I was supposed to be a DC hater? I'm confused!

Punchy

Staff Writer

Outhouser since: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Posts: 35245
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:07 pm

thefourthman wrote:Oh, boy, I can't wait for my review to go live... Supergirl 50 was EVERYTHING that is wrong at DC. It was almost brilliant in a meta way.

But... I liked it... I thought I was supposed to be a DC hater? I'm confused!

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:10 pm

Punchy wrote:But... I liked it... I thought I was supposed to be a DC hater? I'm confused!

If you liked it, then you are a DC hater... :twisted:

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

Outhouser since: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: durham, nc
Posts: 27418
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:10 pm

Punchy wrote:But... I liked it... I thought I was supposed to be a DC hater? I'm confused!

If you liked it, then you are a DC hater... :twisted:

Punchy

Staff Writer

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:12 pm

thefourthman wrote:If you liked it, then you are a DC hater...

I'm so confused.

Punchy

Staff Writer

Outhouser since: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Posts: 35245
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:12 pm

thefourthman wrote:If you liked it, then you are a DC hater...

I'm so confused.

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:13 pm

Punchy wrote:I'm so confused.

Don't worry, my review will explain it all to you.

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

Outhouser since: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: durham, nc
Posts: 27418
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by thefourthman » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:13 pm

Punchy wrote:I'm so confused.

Don't worry, my review will explain it all to you.

Punchy

Staff Writer

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:16 pm

thefourthman wrote:Don't worry, my review will explain it all to you.

If it's anything like your XMF review, I very much doubt that.

Punchy

Staff Writer

Outhouser since: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Posts: 35245
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by Punchy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:16 pm

thefourthman wrote:Don't worry, my review will explain it all to you.

If it's anything like your XMF review, I very much doubt that.

48THRiLLS

Review Grouper

by 48THRiLLS » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:20 pm

Punchy wrote:The Gates story was good! The Slater back-up was pretty, but empty (like Supergirl!)

I agree with the back up being pretty but the Gates story was not good if you were a new reader.

48THRiLLS

Review Grouper

Outhouser since: Fri Feb 20, 2009 5:40 pm
Location: Stumptown
Posts: 3223
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by 48THRiLLS » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:20 pm

Punchy wrote:The Gates story was good! The Slater back-up was pretty, but empty (like Supergirl!)

I agree with the back up being pretty but the Gates story was not good if you were a new reader.

3MJ

by 3MJ » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:23 pm

I thought Supergirl was typical of a DC book. A stupid bad guy, boring talking, average dialogue. You sort of enjoy it but forget what happens 5 minutes later. Fluff.

3MJ

Likes: post
Liked in: post

Search Threads
Search Posts

by 3MJ » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:23 pm

I thought Supergirl was typical of a DC book. A stupid bad guy, boring talking, average dialogue. You sort of enjoy it but forget what happens 5 minutes later. Fluff.