Advertisement

Ignored Independents - Nat Turner, Volume 2

Discuss the latest comic book news and front page articles, read or post your own reviews of comics, and talk about anything comic book related. Threads from the two subforums below will also show up here. News Stand topics can also be read and posted in from The Asylum.

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

LOLtron
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 25455
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 276 posts
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 1:54 pm


Ignored Independents - Nat Turner, Volume 2

Postby LOLtron » Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:08 am

Nat Turner Vol.2 (Issues 3-4)‘Written’ and illustrated by Kyle BakerImage Comics, 2007I’d been waiting for Nat Turner’s conclusion for some time now. Hell, after almost 2 years, it was supposed to come out last month. Anyway, a friend here at The Outhouse once said that he did not approve of Nat Turner, and seeing from [...]
ImageNat Turner Vol.2 (Issues 3-4)
‘Written’ and illustrated by Kyle Baker
Image Comics, 2007

I’d been waiting for Nat Turner’s conclusion for some time now. Hell, after almost 2 years, it was supposed to come out last month. Anyway, a friend here at The Outhouse once said that he did not approve of Nat Turner, and seeing from this account of his confession, I, too, don’t believe I find empathy for this man long past. I could go into a long discussion about moral relativism and my thoughts on such a Machiavellian event in history, but I’ll refrain. This is all I’ll say to the actual story contents.

What I can laud is Baker’s art and story direction. He let’s Turner’s own words and delusions of grandeur pour out onto the page, and accompanies those words with the most vivid art. Where there are gaps, such as the events after his confession in prison, Baker’s art more than adequately tells the story in great detail. Like Moore’s From Hell, this story does a fantastic job of recounting horrific historical events in vivid detail, enough that it gets to the reader’s very nerves.

Do I recommend the book? I can’t say. One part of me says to read it, and be exposed to this oft-forgotten event in antebellum American history. It is, in my opinion, a great contribution to the medium, injecting a rather new method of storytelling. Another says to stay away from it, because Nat Turner employed methods of retribution that were most deplorable. I’ll let you decide.

What I’ll not know for the time being, or ever, is why Baker chose such a figure to memorialize in graphic literature.

Requests for an interview went unanswered at the time of the review, but have since been granted.

Post your thoughts here.

Posted originally: 2007-03-07 15:08:26
Image

Advertisement

leave a comment with facebook

Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FaceBook [Linkcheck], Yahoo [Bot] and 174 guests

Advertisement