Tuesday, May 3, 2016 • Morning Edition • "We put the lotion in the basket."

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!


Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

User avatar

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

Postby thefourthman » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:49 pm

John Snow wrote:
Maybe this is DC's ploy to eliminate Larfleeze fanboys by giving them diabetes.

IHOP and DC completing Evolution's failed tasks.
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:50 pm

Why did they pick a full retard for orange lantern anyway?
User avatar

GHERU

Rain Partier

Postby GHERU » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:51 pm

Victorious Squid wrote:
Big deal. You were probably gonna score high anyway and you can't go over 10.

if we can have a 0 we should be allowed to go above 10
its only fair
especially since, with the 0 gift, it will be abused by those who didn't read the book
therefore making the average a meaningless figure
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:53 pm

GHERU wrote:if we can have a 0 we should be allowed to go above 10
its only fair
especially since, with the 0 present it will be abused by those who didn't read the book
otherwise the average is a meaningless figure


Doesn't make any sense.

You can score the book abyssmal 0 or perfect 10. Both ends of the spectrum are covered. Also, the SOD has spoken.
User avatar

Punchy

Staff Writer

Postby Punchy » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:53 pm

BlueStreak wrote:
I do agree with this statement. Every time you speak out angrily on a pick week, the forces of nonPunchiness conspire to bring you down.


I'm not saying that this doesn't happen, but why am I getting punished and not the 'forces of nonPunchiness', who are the ones who have done something wrong here.
User avatar

GHERU

Rain Partier

Postby GHERU » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:53 pm

Victorious Squid wrote:
We can give a 1.5 or a 9.5, why can't we score a book .5?

this makes sense
User avatar

BlueStreak

The Red Stands for Irony

Postby BlueStreak » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:53 pm

noone wrote:so Yoni and I can grade it a million?


Eleven a good enough compromise?
User avatar

Punchy

Staff Writer

Postby Punchy » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:54 pm

BlueStreak wrote:
Eleven a good enough compromise?


Don't pander to them.
User avatar

GHERU

Rain Partier

Postby GHERU » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:54 pm

Victorious Squid wrote:
Doesn't make any sense.

You can score the book abyssmal 0 or perfect 10. Both ends of the spectrum are covered. Also, the SOD has spoken.

was 0 always an option?
if so, how is that a gift?
if it was 1-10 before and now its 0-10, its only fair to allow an 11
User avatar

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

Postby thefourthman » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:54 pm

Punchy wrote:
I'm not saying that this doesn't happen, but why am I getting punished and not the 'forces of nonPunchiness', who are the ones who have done something wrong here.

Because you are the one with principles.

******

Postby ****** » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:55 pm

Jimmy Trollsen wrote:
I'm not saying that this doesn't happen, but why am I getting punished and not the 'forces of nonPunchiness', who are the ones who have done something wrong here.


This isn't about punishing you Jimmy, it's about not punishing the rest of us.
User avatar

Punchy

Staff Writer

Postby Punchy » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:55 pm

noone wrote:Because you are the one with principles.


So?

Go make a lipstick lesbian cookie in a maze or something.
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:56 pm

Jude needs to code Review Group polls so only members of the Review Group can vote for this shit.
User avatar

thefourthman

Outhouse Editor

Postby thefourthman » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:56 pm

Punchy wrote:
Don't pander to them.

equal opportunity pandering is offensive? do you even know what the word principle means?
User avatar

BlueStreak

The Red Stands for Irony

Postby BlueStreak » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:57 pm

Punchy wrote:
I'm not saying that this doesn't happen, but why am I getting punished and not the 'forces of nonPunchiness', who are the ones who have done something wrong here.


I can't go and change the pick when the masses have spoken. The only way I can think of to rectify this is moving forward to only count votes of Review Groupers.

leave a comment with facebook


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FaceBook [Linkcheck] and 42 guests