Advertisement

Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Discuss the latest comic book news and front page articles, read or post your own reviews of comics, and talk about anything comic book related. Threads from the two subforums below will also show up here. News Stand topics can also be read and posted in from The Asylum.

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

thefourthman
User avatar
Outhouse Editor
 
Posts: 26673
Likes: 71 posts
Liked in: 45 posts
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: durham, nc
Title: The obtuser!
Formerly: your mom


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby thefourthman » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:49 pm

John Snow wrote:
Maybe this is DC's ploy to eliminate Larfleeze fanboys by giving them diabetes.

IHOP and DC completing Evolution's failed tasks.

Advertisement

Victorian Squid
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 31777
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 2 posts
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:04 am
Formerly: Schmormerly


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby Victorian Squid » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:50 pm

Why did they pick a full retard for orange lantern anyway?
Image

GHERU
User avatar


YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 39098
Likes: 149 posts
Liked in: 228 posts
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby GHERU » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:51 pm

Victorious Squid wrote:
Big deal. You were probably gonna score high anyway and you can't go over 10.

if we can have a 0 we should be allowed to go above 10
its only fair
especially since, with the 0 gift, it will be abused by those who didn't read the book
therefore making the average a meaningless figure
RUviews
Benderbrau wrote:Welcome to the Outhouse. Where civility means you're doing it wrong.

Victorian Squid
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 31777
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 2 posts
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:04 am
Formerly: Schmormerly


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby Victorian Squid » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:53 pm

GHERU wrote:if we can have a 0 we should be allowed to go above 10
its only fair
especially since, with the 0 present it will be abused by those who didn't read the book
otherwise the average is a meaningless figure


Doesn't make any sense.

You can score the book abyssmal 0 or perfect 10. Both ends of the spectrum are covered. Also, the SOD has spoken.
Image

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 34418
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 59 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Title: Shitlord


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby Punchy » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:53 pm

BlueStreak wrote:
I do agree with this statement. Every time you speak out angrily on a pick week, the forces of nonPunchiness conspire to bring you down.


I'm not saying that this doesn't happen, but why am I getting punished and not the 'forces of nonPunchiness', who are the ones who have done something wrong here.

GHERU
User avatar


YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 39098
Likes: 149 posts
Liked in: 228 posts
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby GHERU » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:53 pm

Victorious Squid wrote:
We can give a 1.5 or a 9.5, why can't we score a book .5?

this makes sense
RUviews
Benderbrau wrote:Welcome to the Outhouse. Where civility means you're doing it wrong.

BlueStreak
User avatar
The Red Stands for Irony
 
Posts: 12260
Likes: 4 posts
Liked in: 29 posts
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:06 pm
Title: Bat-Min Inc.
Formerly: BlueStreak


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby BlueStreak » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:53 pm

noone wrote:so Yoni and I can grade it a million?


Eleven a good enough compromise?
Image

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 34418
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 59 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Title: Shitlord


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby Punchy » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:54 pm

BlueStreak wrote:
Eleven a good enough compromise?


Don't pander to them.

GHERU
User avatar


YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 39098
Likes: 149 posts
Liked in: 228 posts
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby GHERU » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:54 pm

Victorious Squid wrote:
Doesn't make any sense.

You can score the book abyssmal 0 or perfect 10. Both ends of the spectrum are covered. Also, the SOD has spoken.

was 0 always an option?
if so, how is that a gift?
if it was 1-10 before and now its 0-10, its only fair to allow an 11
RUviews
Benderbrau wrote:Welcome to the Outhouse. Where civility means you're doing it wrong.

thefourthman
User avatar
Outhouse Editor
 
Posts: 26673
Likes: 71 posts
Liked in: 45 posts
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: durham, nc
Title: The obtuser!
Formerly: your mom


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby thefourthman » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:54 pm

Punchy wrote:
I'm not saying that this doesn't happen, but why am I getting punished and not the 'forces of nonPunchiness', who are the ones who have done something wrong here.

Because you are the one with principles.

******
 
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 61 posts


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby ****** » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:55 pm

Jimmy Trollsen wrote:
I'm not saying that this doesn't happen, but why am I getting punished and not the 'forces of nonPunchiness', who are the ones who have done something wrong here.


This isn't about punishing you Jimmy, it's about not punishing the rest of us.

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 34418
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 59 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Title: Shitlord


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby Punchy » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:55 pm

noone wrote:Because you are the one with principles.


So?

Go make a lipstick lesbian cookie in a maze or something.

Victorian Squid
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 31777
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 2 posts
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:04 am
Formerly: Schmormerly


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby Victorian Squid » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:56 pm

Jude needs to code Review Group polls so only members of the Review Group can vote for this shit.
Image

thefourthman
User avatar
Outhouse Editor
 
Posts: 26673
Likes: 71 posts
Liked in: 45 posts
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: durham, nc
Title: The obtuser!
Formerly: your mom


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby thefourthman » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:56 pm

Punchy wrote:
Don't pander to them.

equal opportunity pandering is offensive? do you even know what the word principle means?

BlueStreak
User avatar
The Red Stands for Irony
 
Posts: 12260
Likes: 4 posts
Liked in: 29 posts
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:06 pm
Title: Bat-Min Inc.
Formerly: BlueStreak


Re: Review Group Week #254: Larfleeze Christmas Special

Postby BlueStreak » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:57 pm

Punchy wrote:
I'm not saying that this doesn't happen, but why am I getting punished and not the 'forces of nonPunchiness', who are the ones who have done something wrong here.


I can't go and change the pick when the masses have spoken. The only way I can think of to rectify this is moving forward to only count votes of Review Groupers.
Image

leave a comment with facebook

PreviousNext

Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 37 guests

Advertisement