Advertisement

World At Large: Kids These Days!

[ Facebook comments]

Talk about news, politics, pop culture, entertainment and everything geek with your fellow comic book fans!

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

LOLtron
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 19422
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:54 pm


World At Large: Kids These Days!

Postby LOLtron » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:00 am

I overheard someone complaining about the behaviour of teens. I live in a community where almost a fifth of the population is of retirement age, so that‘s hardly news. This time, however, the complaints were coming from someone who couldn’t have been much older than twenty. Still, not that surprising. As soon as children can talk, they start differentiating themselves from those younger than themselves. “I am not a baby!” is a complaint that starts with toddlers and seems to continue far into adulthood.

This month, to broaden the World At Large’s subject matter, I thought I’d look at something other than politics and consider this perennial complaint. Are kids ruder, more out of control, than they were when “we” were kids? The answer is no, but quoting statistics and studies never seems to quiet the critics, so instead I thought I’d look at a few of the reasons why we, young and old alike, are not like the polite, well mannered people of generations past.

Two of the most important reasons are wealth and democracy. They may seem like unlikely culprits, but manners were strongly connected to class and deference. The complex ordering of table utensils is a hold over from a time when good manners were a complicated part of everyday life. Well, complicated to us. The underlying principle was quite simple. Defer to the rich and powerful. Ignore the poor and minorities. As long as everyone knew who everyone else was, it wasn’t complicated at all. Would they really give up their seats to a lady? Sure, but they didn’t confuse ‘woman’ with ‘lady.’ They are not synonyms. A lady was a woman of property. The wife or daughter of a gentleman. A gentleman would not give his seat to the cleaning woman. He wouldn’t share a table with her in the first place. At one time not showing the proper deference had real consequences. Your ‘betters’ actually controlled your jobs, owned the land you lived on, and so forth, but as democracy spread, power shifted to the middle class and, nominally, at least, to everyone else. If we are all supposed to be equal, why would one person be privileged over another? Once the costs of poor manners disappeared, we lost a major incentive to exercise good manners.

Wealth is connected to class, but its also connected to privacy and personal space. Today, ideally at least, the parents are the only members of the family who share a room. Each kid has his own. In many families there is also more than one television and computer. And this has an important impact on good manners. In 1800 the average family had seven kids. By 1900 the average had dropped to four. Today the number of children per family averages out to one. When you had nine people, seven kids and two parents, living in a small, often one or two room, home, manners provided a formalized code of conduct that created a psychological space around each member. We don’t have those spaces now. We don’t need to create a space within ourselves, because we have it outside ourselves. If you want to get away and have some privacy, go to your room and close the door. Its right there. Only a century ago, only the wealthy could do that. Now it’s the norm. A well mannered life used to be a necessary part of our external and internal conduct. We needed it to get through our day. We don’t anymore.

Of course, beyond broad socio-political matters, if people were going to learn manners, they would have to be taught To be seen role modeled in our daily lives. And who is going to do that? The old couple down the street? When today’s seniors were kids, they weren’t running home to help mom and pop bring in the crops. No, they’d watch TV and listen to rock and roll. The teen as the suburban-television-watching-rock-and-roll-listening-juvenile-delinquent is a cliché that goes back over sixty years. Back then people were making the same complaints about kids we hear today, but kids then did have one advantage: the adults in their lives were willing to grow up and be adults. The Boomer generation is unique in wanting to celebrate and cling to its youth, but if Boomers are still young and hip, where does that leave their children--and, given how old many Boomers really are, their children’s children? Why they’re just babies. And you love babies, but treat them like equals? I don’t think so. And this brings us right back to the twenty year old complaining about teens. If we infantilize everyone under forty (or fifty, or sixty), we can hardly expect them to act like adults.
Originally Pubished at: David Bird



http://www.theouthousers.com/index.php/blog/david-birds-blog/13399-world-at-large-kids-these-days.html/
Image

Advertisement

S.F. Jude Terror
User avatar
OMCTO
 
Posts: 69360
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:44 am
Location: Up Your Ass
Title: Webmaster Supreme
Formerly: Dr. Jude Terror


Re: World At Large: Kids These Days!

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:15 am

Kids today are pussies.
Image
I LOVE BLUD BLOOD! - Rob Liefeld
some idiot on facebook wrote:I don't like your belittling tone, Jude. Just because I don't know how to spell the language of some tiny African nation doesn't mean that I'm wrong in thinking that your attitude towards women is 100% wrong. Obviously, you're some skinny, single nerd living on the East Coast who probably derives value in life from wrestling matches, hoping that Wolverine gets to sleep with teenagers and engaging in casual drug use. You're literally the worst thing to happen to comics since Stan Lee.

CountD
User avatar
Undead Member
 
Posts: 35252
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:19 pm
Title: Senior Citizen
Formerly: t00lverine


Re: World At Large: Kids These Days!

Postby CountD » Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:19 am

Kids these days are _____.

Chesscub
User avatar
Humuhumunukunukuapuaa
 
Posts: 10789
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:22 pm
Location: Dracut, MA
Title: Bear du jour


Re: World At Large: Kids These Days!

Postby Chesscub » Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:38 am

CountD wrote:Kids these days are _____.


goats?

Victorian Squid
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 30021
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:04 am
Formerly: Schmormerly


Re: World At Large: Kids These Days!

Postby Victorian Squid » Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:41 am

When today’s seniors were kids, they weren’t running home to help mom and pop bring in the crops. No, they’d watch TV and listen to rock and roll.


That's a massive generalization around then-young people who may have experienced life in the then-new suburbia, but of rural demographic areas or areas of poverty, much less so. My own parents who are seniors didn't have TV as young adults and still don't know who the Beatles are exactly because they grew up in areas of the midwestern USA that were still primarily farm towns and small communities.

Of today's seniors, many still had responsibilities almost unheard of today for young kids. I also have friends in that age range who are old hippies who've never "grown up" to some degree. The early days of rock'n'roll were just the very beginning of the media culture that to a large degree unified later generations in their shared assimilation of pop culture.
Image

David Bird
User avatar
phrase IV
 
Posts: 5602
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:28 pm
Location: Victoria, BC


Re: World At Large: Kids These Days!

Postby David Bird » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:28 am

Victorian Squid wrote:
That's a massive generalization around then-young people who may have experienced life in the then-new suburbia, but of rural demographic areas or areas of poverty, much less so. My own parents who are seniors didn't have TV as young adults and still don't know who the Beatles are exactly because they grew up in areas of the midwestern USA that were still primarily farm towns and small communities.

Of today's seniors, many still had responsibilities almost unheard of today for young kids. I also have friends in that age range who are old hippies who've never "grown up" to some degree. The early days of rock'n'roll were just the very beginning of the media culture that to a large degree unified later generations in their shared assimilation of pop culture.


It is a generalization inasmuch as I am talking about people in general, but it is fair. There are kids today who don't watch TV or listen to rock, who have part time jobs in order to help their families out, but by the time the 1950s came around most people lived in urban areas and were as completely immersed in pop culture as we are today. And pop culture, by the way, predates rock and roll. The music industry was firmly in place long before Bill Haley was a gleam in his father's eye. So was Hollywood. And lost people had TVs by then too.

CountD
User avatar
Undead Member
 
Posts: 35252
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:19 pm
Title: Senior Citizen
Formerly: t00lverine


Re: World At Large: Kids These Days!

Postby CountD » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:34 am

when comparing the 50's and 60's to the 70s and on, how can you not mention kids and video games? this seems the most drastic change in entertainment and how kids act. Kids are more desensitized to violence and less likely to go out and play outdoors, imho.

Apache Chef
User avatar
Expert Post Whore
 
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:48 pm


Re: World At Large: Kids These Days!

Postby Apache Chef » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:56 am

I'm not really around teens very much, but I am around a lot of fresh out of college 22-23 year olds at my office. And while I'm only a decade older than them, I can see differences between them and my contemporaries. The most obvious is a lack of respect. They'll work here for a week and they act like they fucking own the place. Maybe I was an exception, but I know for a fact I was not like that at the beginning of my career.

The second thing I notice is a sense of entitlement. I hear a lot of complaints from the same crowd about how they deserve this or that, or their parents are buying them a car, or they deserve this gift or that gift for their birthday/christmas/wedding or something. For people that are allegedly adults (people younger than 25), it's incredibly selfish and petty thinking. And again, I know I wasn't that way at that age.

CountD
User avatar
Undead Member
 
Posts: 35252
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:19 pm
Title: Senior Citizen
Formerly: t00lverine


Re: World At Large: Kids These Days!

Postby CountD » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:54 pm

something happens when you turn 28ish.

you look in the mirror and see who you are.

David Bird
User avatar
phrase IV
 
Posts: 5602
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:28 pm
Location: Victoria, BC


Re: World At Large: Kids These Days!

Postby David Bird » Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:20 pm

CountD wrote:when comparing the 50's and 60's to the 70s and on, how can you not mention kids and video games? this seems the most drastic change in entertainment and how kids act. Kids are more desensitized to violence and less likely to go out and play outdoors, imho.


Apache Chef wrote:I'm not really around teens very much, but I am around a lot of fresh out of college 22-23 year olds at my office. And while I'm only a decade older than them, I can see differences between them and my contemporaries. The most obvious is a lack of respect. They'll work here for a week and they act like they fucking own the place. Maybe I was an exception, but I know for a fact I was not like that at the beginning of my career.

The second thing I notice is a sense of entitlement. I hear a lot of complaints from the same crowd about how they deserve this or that, or their parents are buying them a car, or they deserve this gift or that gift for their birthday/christmas/wedding or something. For people that are allegedly adults (people younger than 25), it's incredibly selfish and petty thinking. And again, I know I wasn't that way at that age.


I think part of the reason I have a different perspective on this is that I married and started a family at a very young age (married at 19, a dad 18 months later). It took me out of my own peer and put me in with a much older crowd. That was alsmost thirty years ago. Trust me, they really were saying the same thing about kids then as they are now: selfish, spoiled, think the world owes them a living, anti-social, the media is de-sensitizing them to violence. And from my interest in social history it becomes very clear that people were saying the same thing thiry years before that! (Only comics, not games, were a major corrupting influence.) If I had gone the stat route, I am sure that I'd still be hearing these same responses, but study after study show that kids are getting more conservative, less anti-social (the crime rate, for example, continues to drop) year after year.

leave a comment with facebook


Return to The Asylum



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], HNutz, Juan Cena, Lord Ice, Stalzer2002, TROY, Turning180 and 35 guests

Advertisement