Advertisement

Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Discuss the latest comic book news and front page articles, read or post your own reviews of comics, and talk about anything comic book related. Threads from the two subforums below will also show up here. News Stand topics can also be read and posted in from The Asylum.

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

chap22
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 21444
Likes: 32 posts
Liked in: 175 posts
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:08 pm
Location: Missi-by God-ssippi, a.k.a. Chapveria
Title: Pretentious curmudgeon


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby chap22 » Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:15 pm

Punchy wrote:
Exactly, Daredevil was a character who's actions had consequences when the tone was dark. A swashbuckling DD goes against those consequences unless it's the result of a mental breakdown.

Or a mix of denial plus refusal to dwell on the past. People refuse to be depressed or refuse to be miserable in the face of bad circumstances all the time; doesn't mean they've necessarily had a breakdown.

But Waid may play it that way, and I'll buy his explanation either way. But let's not act like Matt hasn't done this before.

Advertisement

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 34525
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 109 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Title: This guy, right?


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Punchy » Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:20 pm

chap22 wrote:Or a mix of denial plus refusal to dwell on the past. People refuse to be depressed or refuse to be miserable in the face of bad circumstances all the time; doesn't mean they've necessarily had a breakdown.

But Waid may play it that way, and I'll buy his explanation either way. But let's not act like Matt hasn't done this before.


He has, but not to this ridiculous extent. The scene with the Coffee-vendor may have been played for laughs, but it was disturbing in a way too.

Johnny Smith
User avatar
Motherfucker from Hell
 
Posts: 2350
Likes: 24 posts
Liked in: 179 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:59 am
Title: Metadata Broker


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Johnny Smith » Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:45 pm

chap22 wrote:meh, you talk about Waid establihing he may have gone through a psychotic break now, but marrying Milla in the first place was the result of a psychotic break. Bendis pretty clearly set that out.

and why can't he just move on? there's precedent!! Matt moved on pretty damn quick after Heather Glenn killed herself because being with Matt drove her nuts...at least Milla's still sucking in air and blowing it back out again.

as far as Milla goes, good riddance to bad rubbish, IMMO. if Waid never mentions her, it'll be too soon.


Agreed. The issue of Milla has been beat to death (figuratively) - Brubaker spent more than enough time dealing with her situation.

Victorian Squid
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 32072
Likes: 119 posts
Liked in: 133 posts
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:04 am
Formerly: Schmormerly


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Victorian Squid » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:26 pm

Still believe deep at the heart of this debate is readers' constant fear of change. Even those who advocate for it in comics grieve mightily when it comes for something they happened to be liking just fine.

Also, no one has a problem with Peter Parker's persona when he quips his way through his darkest hours, and that character has also had his share of loss and death.

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 34525
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 109 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Title: This guy, right?


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Punchy » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:42 pm

Asmodeus Jones wrote:Still believe deep at the heart of this debate is readers' constant fear of change. Even those who advocate for it in comics grieve mightily when it comes for something they happened to be liking just fine.

Also, no one has a problem with Peter Parker's persona when he quips his way through his darkest hours, and that character has also had his share of loss and death.


It's not a fear of change, it's a fear of change that doesn't make sense.

And Peter Parker and Matt Murdock are very different people, it's like how both Dick Grayson and Bruce Wayne's parents were murdered, but one of them is still able to laugh and have fun, while the other becomes Batman.

Starlord
User avatar
Outhouse Editor
 
Posts: 35131
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Michigan


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Starlord » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:47 pm

Daredevil #1

Sorry this has taken me so long, and it was the first thing I read on Wednesday. Loved this book. The stories, the art, the editing, the lettering. All picture perfect. Too bad Daredevil still sucks as a character.

Story: 10
Art: 10
My Score: 9.5
Image

Max Blyss wrote:Months and months and months and the whole thing is still just an intersection at Dipshit Lane & Chip on my Shoulder Ave.

Daringd
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 196
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:05 pm


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Daringd » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:43 pm

DD #1

Was a perfect comic....nothing else to say

10/10

superfictious
User avatar
Humuhumunukunukuapuaa
 
Posts: 10399
Likes: 86 posts
Liked in: 180 posts
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:38 pm
Title: superfictious.wordpress.com


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby superfictious » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:53 pm

Punchy wrote:
It's not a fear of change, it's a fear of change that doesn't make sense.

And Peter Parker and Matt Murdock are very different people, it's like how both Dick Grayson and Bruce Wayne's parents were murdered, but one of them is still able to laugh and have fun, while the other becomes Batman.


DD used to be the one who laughed and had fun, while Spiderman was ultimately the dour and pessimistic, even when he was cracking wise.

Eli Katz
User avatar
OMCTO
 
Posts: 10933
Likes: 21 posts
Liked in: 66 posts
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:44 pm
Title: Avatar Winner, Apr 2012


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Eli Katz » Mon Jul 25, 2011 3:55 pm

I will review this book tomorrow, I hope. I still haven't read it. But boy, the pictures sure are pretty.

Victorian Squid
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 32072
Likes: 119 posts
Liked in: 133 posts
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:04 am
Formerly: Schmormerly


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Victorian Squid » Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:05 pm

False Prophet wrote:
DD used to be the one who laughed and had fun, while Spiderman was ultimately the dour and pessimistic, even when he was cracking wise.


Yep.

Amoebas
User avatar
Son of Stein
 
Posts: 21767
Likes: 260 posts
Liked in: 648 posts
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:27 pm
Location: Auburn, MA
Title: Amorphous Anomoly


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Amoebas » Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:12 pm

chap22 wrote:well, i disagree with your charcterization of it as a "fan war", personally, because i don't fit into either of the 2 camps you ascribe to the war. i myself worship at the altar of Miller's DD. it is by miles and miles the best work on the character ever, and one of IMMO the top 10 superhero comic runs of all time (when looked at all together: the initial run, BA, and MWOF). i love DD in dark stories, mixing himself with gritty, noir elements like Turk, Josie's Bar, gang wars, etc. yet i also like my DD more swashbuckley, b/c that's who Matt is as a person.

b/c here's the thing that the recent decade or so's worth of writers (Bendis, Bru, Diggle) have forgotten: even Frank knew when enough was enough. yeah, he beat on DD and beat on him and beat on him, but in the end Matt overcame and found himself. he was "born again" as himself. Nocenti pulled a similar trick, laying defeat and disgrace and shame and bad decisions on him for 50-60 issues until Matt, because he is the HERO of the story, fought his way back up out of literal Hell to find himself again. and that waas just nowhere to be found in Bendis, et al's runs.

and yes, i'll buy the fact that events change a man. but here's where i think your true divide lies: most of us realize this is a serial medium. and most of us realize that in such a serial medium, while stories matter, characters matter more. and there's only so far and so much you can change a character until he's no longer recognizable to the fans that follow him. and once you do that, not every writer is going to be able to write stories of a high enough quality to keep those readers who read the book for Matt Murdock as opposed to those who read for BMB, or for Bru, or for "let's see how much shit Writer X can pile on DD this arc"


Here here. :smt023

Amoebas
User avatar
Son of Stein
 
Posts: 21767
Likes: 260 posts
Liked in: 648 posts
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:27 pm
Location: Auburn, MA
Title: Amorphous Anomoly


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Amoebas » Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:14 pm

Asmodeus Jones wrote:Still believe deep at the heart of this debate is readers' constant fear of change. Even those who advocate for it in comics grieve mightily when it comes for something they happened to be liking just fine.

Also, no one has a problem with Peter Parker's persona when he quips his way through his darkest hours, and that character has also had his share of loss and death.


It's not "fear of change". It's fear of change for change's sake or fear of crappy change. A lot of today's writers try to cram thier round story into a square character instead of taking the time to whittle both both pieces so they mesh. Frank Miller made radical sweeping changes to Daredevil, but because he took the time it worked incredibly.

And to correct you, no one has a problem with "Spider-Man" making jokes during the tough times, because it's been well established that that is both his coping mechanism and a battle tactic to annoy and anger his opponents into making a mistake.

Peter Parker isn't a tenth the wise-cracker that Spider-Man is.

Victorian Squid
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 32072
Likes: 119 posts
Liked in: 133 posts
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:04 am
Formerly: Schmormerly


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Victorian Squid » Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:22 pm

I see we are resorting to pedantry now. :roll:

Chris
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 41495
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 156 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:10 pm
Title: Stuff Writer
Formerly: Chris


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Chris » Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:29 pm

This argument is rather shallow and pedantic.
Image

Victorian Squid
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 32072
Likes: 119 posts
Liked in: 133 posts
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:04 am
Formerly: Schmormerly


Re: Review Group Week #284: Daredevil #1

Postby Victorian Squid » Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:33 pm

Some jokes don't work well on the internets.

leave a comment with facebook

PreviousNext

Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: TimH and 76 guests

Advertisement