The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!

Skip to content

Advertisement

Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Locking

[ Facebook comments]

Talk about news, politics, pop culture, entertainment and everything geek with your fellow comic book fans!
Post a reply

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

Benderbrau
User avatar
Twenty-Something
 
Posts: 56141
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:18 am
Location: Your Moms Bedroom
Title: Proud Underachiever


Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Locking

Postby Benderbrau » Sat Aug 06, 2011 7:40 pm

I mean seriously, the thread was over a year old. How offended could some one be if it took them a year to report it? :?
Image
"Dude, I bow down to you, you are the worlds greatest ballbuster." -Jude Terror
"Sorry, nate! I think you automatically lose all arguments from now on, simply due to the fact that the only person willing to back you up is batshit insane!" - Dragavon
"Everything I know I learned from reading your posts." - Nietoperz
Top
Advertisement
covalesky
User avatar
Expert Post Whore
 
Posts: 5245
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:48 pm


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby covalesky » Sat Aug 06, 2011 7:54 pm

Dunno what the big deal is, the reason for the closing was clear
Top
Thunderstorm
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 18127
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:24 am
Title: Whitest Poster 2010!!


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby Thunderstorm » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:06 pm

If we don't occasionally lock threads, we miss out on great threads about locked threads.
Top
Benderbrau
User avatar
Twenty-Something
 
Posts: 56141
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:18 am
Location: Your Moms Bedroom
Title: Proud Underachiever


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby Benderbrau » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:11 pm

covalesky wrote:Dunno what the big deal is, the reason for the closing was clear

Yes, the reason was that there were now "several" reports about it. But being that it's a year later isn't it a little late to say you find it offensive?
Image
"Dude, I bow down to you, you are the worlds greatest ballbuster." -Jude Terror
"Sorry, nate! I think you automatically lose all arguments from now on, simply due to the fact that the only person willing to back you up is batshit insane!" - Dragavon
"Everything I know I learned from reading your posts." - Nietoperz
Top
covalesky
User avatar
Expert Post Whore
 
Posts: 5245
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:48 pm


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby covalesky » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:12 pm

Benderbrau wrote:Yes, the reason was that there were now "several" reports about it. But being that it's a year later isn't it a little late to say you find it offensive?


It is never late to be offended... or horny.
Top
Potter Who
User avatar
penile prisoner
 
Posts: 7622
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 1:22 am


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby Potter Who » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:14 pm

Benderbrau wrote:Yes, the reason was that there were now "several" reports about it. But being that it's a year later isn't it a little late to say you find it offensive?

Who gives a shit?

That's a rhetorical question.
Top
Stephen Day
User avatar
Wrasslin' Fan
 
Posts: 27448
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Canada
Title: Maple Leaf Ninja


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby Stephen Day » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:18 pm

Potter Who wrote:Who gives a shit?

That's a rhetorical question.


Well obviously Bender does. The question you should have asked was -- who gives a shit that's important? :P :wink:
Image

Thank you Troy for the sig
Top
covalesky
User avatar
Expert Post Whore
 
Posts: 5245
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:48 pm


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby covalesky » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:22 pm

Stephen Day wrote:
Well obviously Bender does. The question you should have asked was -- who gives a shit that's important? :P :wink:



You guys are being cruel!







Image
Top
Victorian Squid
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 29958
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:04 am
Formerly: Schmormerly


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby Victorian Squid » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:24 pm

Image

^The official statue of lamentations for thread locking.
Top
Potter Who
User avatar
penile prisoner
 
Posts: 7622
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 1:22 am


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby Potter Who » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:26 pm

Asmodeus Jones wrote:Image

^The official statue of lamentations for thread locking.

Jesus was such a drama queen.
Top
Benderbrau
User avatar
Twenty-Something
 
Posts: 56141
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:18 am
Location: Your Moms Bedroom
Title: Proud Underachiever


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby Benderbrau » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:26 pm

Stephen Day wrote:
Well obviously Bender does. The question you should have asked was -- who gives a shit that's important? :P :wink:

You really don't know what the word rhetorical mean do you? :smt011
Image
"Dude, I bow down to you, you are the worlds greatest ballbuster." -Jude Terror
"Sorry, nate! I think you automatically lose all arguments from now on, simply due to the fact that the only person willing to back you up is batshit insane!" - Dragavon
"Everything I know I learned from reading your posts." - Nietoperz
Top
Thunderstorm
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 18127
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:24 am
Title: Whitest Poster 2010!!


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby Thunderstorm » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:35 pm

Benderbrau wrote:Yes, the reason was that there were now "several" reports about it. But being that it's a year later isn't it a little late to say you find it offensive?


It's like the "Leave the porch light on for Caley" thing everyone did on Facebook when her mom was found not guilty. Sometimes it takes YEARS for people to give a damn. :)
Top
Stephen Day
User avatar
Wrasslin' Fan
 
Posts: 27448
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Canada
Title: Maple Leaf Ninja


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby Stephen Day » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:36 pm

Benderbrau wrote:You really don't know what the word rhetorical mean do you? :smt011


Well..

...I...

...Dammit, you got me there. :smt011
Image

Thank you Troy for the sig
Top
GOSD
User avatar
Everybody lies!
 
Posts: 23759
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Upstate NY
Title: More eviler than achilles!
Formerly: Ghost of Scooterdoom


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby GOSD » Sat Aug 06, 2011 11:26 pm

Benderbrau wrote:I mean seriously, the thread was over a year old. How offended could some one be if it took them a year to report it? :?
White guilt finally took hold in Eli and Potter.

Pathetic.
Top
Potter Who
User avatar
penile prisoner
 
Posts: 7622
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 1:22 am


Re: Shouldn't There Be A Statute Of Limitation On Thread Loc

Postby Potter Who » Sat Aug 06, 2011 11:32 pm

GOSD wrote:White guilt finally took hold in Eli and Potter.

Pathetic.

Image

No one cares what you think about it.
Top

leave a comment with facebook

Next
Post a reply

Return to The Asylum



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 45 guests

Advertisement
  • Follow Us / Ads

Follow TheOuthousers on Twitter

Follow TheOuthouse on Facebook

RSS Digest Feed

MoleHole Radio Podcasts and More!
Femme Gamers - Playing Harder. Playing Smarter.


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

phpBB SEO