The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

by **sdsichero** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:07 pm

bkthomson wrote:
I'm reading your post does that mean you did not read that on the internet?

That would not be accurate.

by **Kolimar** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:31 pm

Good thing I'm a patient guy. At least for this kind of thing. :-D

by **JL_Amato** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:22 pm

JL_Amato wrote:Paul Rudd, Jason Segel, Jonah Hill, and Craig Robinson IMO

Please, please, please

by **Chris** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:23 pm

JL_Amato wrote:Please, please, please

I say thee nay!!

Paul Rudd, Jason Segel, Danny McBride, Craig Robinson.

by **JL_Amato** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:28 pm

Chris wrote:
I say thee nay!!

Paul Rudd, Jason Segel, Danny McBride, Craig Robinson.

I'd be cool with that.

Adam Scott, Seth Rogen, or Donald Glover would be cool too.

by **Chris** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 5:01 pm

JL_Amato wrote:I'd be cool with that.

Adam Scott, Seth Rogen, or Donald Glover would be cool too.

Thou dost maketh good senseth.

by **JL_Amato** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:22 pm

Chris wrote:
Thou dost maketh good senseth.

I should really be in charge of casting this movie.

by **Rockman** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:37 pm

ugh Danny McBride is the absolute worst.

by **Chris** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 7:27 pm

AMS wrote:ugh Danny McBride is the absolute worst.

Kenny Powers says you're wrong.

by **Benderbrau** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:10 pm

'Ghostbusters III' a no-go without Bill Murray

His latest movie may be called "No Strings Attached," but it seems there are quite a few hitches involved in getting director Ivan Reitman's planned "Ghostbusters" sequel off the ground.

"All of the actors but one have read [the script] and loved it," Reitman tells CNN of "Ghostbusters III." "We're waiting for one of them to read it and see where we are.”

The holdout?

“That would be the famous Bill Murray — Mr. Venkman," Reitman says of the quirky karaoke crasher/funnyman, who starred alongside Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis in "Ghostbusters" (1984) and "Ghostbusters II" (1989).

Reitman, 64, adds that he feels the latest installment is better than the previous two movies. "I'm really jazzed about it," he tells CNN.

And if Murray doesn't like it? “We have a very complicated deal," says Reitman. "Let's just put it that way."

by **Rockman** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:51 pm

Bill Murray did Garfield, he should have no problem doing this.

He probably will though.

by **Benderbrau** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:53 pm

AMS wrote:Bill Murray did Garfield, he should have no problem doing this.

He probably will though.

Not a good analogy I'm afraid.

From: the-asylum/dear-bill-murray-wrong-joel-cohen-t46482.html

Murray Regrets Garfield

Funnyman Bill Murray regrets lending his voice to animated film Garfield to work with his idol, comedy writer Joel Coen - because he realised too late the part was written by a different Joel Cohen.

The actor admits he jumped at the chance to play the fat cat in the 2004 live-action film, loosely based on the Jim Davis comic strip Garfield - when he thought one half of the Oscar-winning Coen brothers filmmaking duo was attached to the script.

But he didn't realise until it was too late that another writer with a similar name had actually worked on the screenplay - and it wasn't funny.

Murray tells America's GQ magazine, "I thought it would be kind of fun, because doing a voice is challenging, and I'd never done that. Plus, I looked at the script, and it said, "So-and-so and Joel Cohen.' And I thought: 'Christ, well, I love those Coens!' They're funny. So I sorta read a few pages of it and thought, 'Yeah, I'd like to do that.'

"Finally I went out to L.A. to record my lines... and the lines got worse and worse. And I said, 'Okay, you better show me the whole rest of the movie, so we can see what we're dealing with.' So I sat down and watched the whole thing, and I kept saying, 'Who the hell cut this this thing? Who did this? What the f**k was Coen thinking? And then they explained it to me: it wasn't written by Joel Coen."

Joel and his brother Ethan Coen are famed for their critically-acclaimed movies Burn After Reading, No Country For Old Men and A Serious Man.

And yet he still insists on repeatedly bragging about not using an agent. :roll:

Hey Bill! This is why you have an agent. :lol:

by **Strict31** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:15 pm

Does he have some sort of scorn for the type of work that actually made him famous and well-loved by audiences?

by **Benderbrau** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:23 pm

Strict31 wrote:Does he have some sort of scorn for the type of work that actually made him famous and well-loved by audiences?

I get the impression that one Oscar nomination and now he thinks he's better then that or something. Which is ironic because he's notorious for hating Chevy Chase so much when Chevy left his roots at SNL when his career took off that Bill punched him.

by **Benderbrau** » Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:22 pm

Aykroyd: 'Ghostbusters 3 Is A Go With Or Without Murray'

The long-awaited third Ghostbusters movie is set to start shooting early next year, possibly without Bill Murray.

The Lost in Translation star remains the last original castmember to sign on for the sequel and now former co-star Dan Aykroyd has revealed the project could be moving forward without him.

Appearing on radio host Denis Miller's show recently, the Blues Brothers star said, "We will be doing the movie and hopefully with Mr. Murray. That is our hope. (But) the concept is much larger than each individual role."

The actor also confirmed reports suggesting the new film will set up a series of new Ghostbusters films: "The promise of Ghostbusters 3 is that we get to hand the equipment and the franchise down to new blood.

"My character, Ray, is now blind in one eye and can't drive the cadillac. He's got a bad knee and can't pick up the pack.

"Egon (Harold Ramis) is too large to get into the harness. We need young blood and that's the promise. We're gonna hand it to a new generation."

http://www.imdb.com/news/ni14545082/

Sorry guys but I don't blame him. I think you're trying to push this through because your careers are in the dumpster. Murray on the other hand has really made a name for himself and I can't blame him for not wanting to sully it with your desperate attempt to make a quick buck off the success of your only real cinematic accomplishment*

* most of this comment is aimed at Aykroyd and Hudson. Ramis had some success as a director but lately even his career has faltered thanks to shit like Analyze That and Year One.