The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

by **jeremy** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:10 pm

Rockman wrote:
You watch Burn Notice right?

YOu know how Fiona is supposed to be this hot sexpot who makes everyones jaws drop and can seduce any man? But in reality she is a living skeleton with a ghastly ghoulish face?

Okay well at least Hatheway won't be that bad.

this part is true, Fiona is ugly

by **Rockman** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:11 pm

e_galston wrote:
yet the person that everyone is comparing her to is Michelle Pfiefer who outside of the damn catsuit is a lot less attractive than Anne..

I always found Pfiefer to be very attractive in her younger years.

This stuff is subjective.

I liked Kirsten Dunst as MJ too, a lot of people didn't. Yes she has major snaggletooth but I never noticed while watching the films.

by **Rockman** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:14 pm

Not really that attractive.

Kind of creepy really, especially in the context of the movie. She was licked to life by a bunch of stray cats, and became these creepy zombie catwoman. Which is what Tim Burton wanted.

by **e_galston** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:14 pm

Rockman wrote:
I always found Pfiefer to be very attractive in her younger years.

This stuff is subjective.

I liked Kirsten Dunst as MJ too, a lot of people didn't. Yes she has major snaggletooth but I never noticed while watching the films.

But was Pfiefer really that young when she did Batman Returns?

by **Thunderstorm** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:16 pm

I see my plan to mail Nolan mutilated earless cats worked.

by **Rockman** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:16 pm

e_galston wrote:
But was Pfiefer really that young when she did Batman Returns?

She was born in 58.

So mid thirties

by **Strict31** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:20 pm

e_galston wrote:
yet the person that everyone is comparing her to is Michelle Pfiefer who outside of the damn catsuit is a lot less attractive than Anne..

I disagree.

I mean, tastes are subjective I guess. I cannot understand why so many guys think Hathaway is some pinnacle of hotitude. Her tits, maybe? She ain't ugly by any means, but Get Smart was the first time I ever thought she was an attractive chick. And even then, it was a matter of "there's more attractive bitches out there."

A lot of folks were popping mahogany when Hathaway was announced for this movie. I was like, "Oh...well...okay."

by **Rockman** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:22 pm

Strict31 wrote:
I disagree.

I mean, tastes are subjective I guess. I cannot understand why so many guys think Hathaway is some pinnacle of hotitude. Her tits, maybe? She ain't ugly by any means, but Get Smart was the first time I ever thought she was an attractive chick. And even then, it was a matter of "there's more attractive bitches out there."

A lot of folks were popping mahogany when Hathaway was announced for this movie. I was like, "Oh...well...okay."

I just think the pool of attractive GOOD actresses is shallow. I honestly can't think of many who have the right build who wouldn't suck it up. Hathaway may not be a perfect 10 but at least she can act.

by **Dragavon** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:27 pm

Strict31 wrote:
I disagree.

I mean, tastes are subjective I guess. I cannot understand why so many guys think Hathaway is some pinnacle of hotitude. Her tits, maybe? She ain't ugly by any means, but Get Smart was the first time I ever thought she was an attractive chick. And even then, it was a matter of "there's more attractive bitches out there."

A lot of folks were popping mahogany when Hathaway was announced for this movie. I was like, "Oh...well...okay."

The first movie had Katie Holmes. The second movie had Maggie Gyllenhaal. Hathaway is a supermodel compared to these two.

by **Strict31** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:29 pm

Rockman wrote:
I just think the pool of attractive GOOD actresses is shallow. I honestly can't think of many who have the right build who wouldn't suck it up. Hathaway may not be a perfect 10 but at least she can act.

How many of them can act like a more attractive chick than they really are?

At least it ain't Maggie Gyllenhall again. Looking at her face for half the movie made me angry.

by **Rockman** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:34 pm

Strict31 wrote:
How many of them can act like a more attractive chick than they really are?

At least it ain't Maggie Gyllenhall again. Looking at her face for half the movie made me angry.

honestly half the time I felt like I was watching an extremely talented bull dog.

by **e_galston** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:47 pm

But Maggie was million times better than Katie Holmes

by **MrBlack** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:33 pm

I don't have a problem with Anne Hathaway being cast as Catwoman.

I don't have a problem with the costume.

I have a problem with Catwoman being in the movie period. After the first two movies, this looks fucking ridiculous.

by **Chris** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:34 pm

I trust Nolan to make a good movie.. but what we've seen of Catwoman so far has me really worried. At least about her.

She does not look good at all.