Spidey-man isn't being satirical.
When it comes to infringing on religious rights, as an avid church goer, I am very much opposed to the idea, though the issue is more complicated than the debate usually shows.
For example, churches are largely funded on government revenue expenditures. When we get a tax write off on something, the government is allowing us to spend our tax dollars as we want, rather than as they want. When we donate to a church, we get a tax write off. Effectively, the money we give, at least in part (you're never allowed to deduct all of it, unfortunately) is money that would have gone to taxes. How much control the government should have over what is technically their money is a question never asked in this debate.
Another thing that's never brought up is the fact that the separation of Church and State is a secular, not religious, idea. There is nothing in the Bible or in two thousand years of Church doctrine to support the idea that the government can't tell the churches what kind of health care to provide their employees. Paul wrote, of a government that routinely tortured and killed Christians, and had no problem with homosexuality or abortion/infanticide:
Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God's wrath but also for the sake of conscience. For because of this you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed.
When the early church could not submit to the dictates of their government, instead of demanding to be exempted or even have their values reflected in law, they accepted the consequences, even death.
Final thought, and I brought this up in the blog post, if most Christians actually practice birth control, and they do, who's values are actually being infringed upon by this policy?