[ Facebook comments]
Talk about news, politics, pop culture, entertainment and everything geek with your fellow comic book fans!
-
Herald

- Humuhumunukunukuapuaa
-
- Posts: 10251
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:47 am
- Title: Fun for the Whole Family!!
by Herald » Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:27 pm
nietoperz wrote:I'm still not entirely clear how the film-makers can do stuff like this without getting sued.

It falls under parody, which has been protected speech since Mad magazine won a lawsuit against them in the '60s.
Advertisement
-
Herald

- Humuhumunukunukuapuaa
-
- Posts: 10251
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:47 am
- Title: Fun for the Whole Family!!
by Herald » Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:29 pm
GLX wrote:
"Leia, I am your daddy."
"Mmmmm" *slurp*
I find your lack of
Squick disturbing...
-
nietoperz

- The Goddamn Bat-min
-
- Posts: 40432
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:36 pm
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Title: Forum Manager
by nietoperz » Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:29 pm
Herald wrote:
It falls under parody, which has been protected speech since Mad magazine won a lawsuit against them in the '60s.
I know that, but surely there has to be more to a parody than a fairly slavish copy of the original with some sex added for good measure. I mean, he word 'parody' implies some amount of humour and/or satire.
-
Herald

- Humuhumunukunukuapuaa
-
- Posts: 10251
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:47 am
- Title: Fun for the Whole Family!!
by Herald » Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:33 pm
nietoperz wrote:
I know that, but surely there has to be more to a parody than a fairly slavish copy of the original with some sex added for good measure. I mean, he word 'parody' implies some amount of humour and/or satire.
Clearly, there doesn't.
Let's put it this way: If there was ANY possible legal recourse to stop these parodies, the porn companies would be getting sued left, right, and center. You know as well as I do that Time Warner wouldn't put up with the Super/Bat-porn parodies if they didn't have to.
-
Zechs

- Staff Writer
-
- Posts: 40883
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:10 pm
- Location: From Parts Unknown
- Title: Deposted Despot
- Formerly: Blight, Deacon Frost, Heinrich Himmler of S_D

-
by Zechs » Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:38 pm
The thing is though.. didn't Lucas win legally against one parody film though?


sdsichero wrote:
I especially like and admire Zechs. He's everything I wish I could be!
Dragavon wrote:Zechs... is...
Zechs...is...
I can't say it. It's too horrible. Zechs...is...not...wrong...
-
Herald

- Humuhumunukunukuapuaa
-
- Posts: 10251
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:47 am
- Title: Fun for the Whole Family!!
by Herald » Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:41 pm
Zechs wrote:The thing is though.. didn't Lucas win legally against one parody film though?
Never heard of that incident.
-
Victorian Squid

- YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
-
- Posts: 30007
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:04 am
- Formerly: Schmormerly
by Victorian Squid » Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:42 pm
Herald's right, there's a long line of case law supporting their rights to do so as long as consumers aren't being mislead--and in many cases the word "parody" is right there in the title of the porno.
-
Cat-Scratch

- A Damn Cuddly Beast
-
- Posts: 60618
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
- Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\
by Cat-Scratch » Sat Feb 18, 2012 9:39 pm
guitarsmashley wrote:
It was the dad thing.
But the brother thing didn't?

Strict31 wrote:To quote Hunter S. Thompson, there is nothing more despicable than a cat in the depths of a nip binge..
Strict31 wrote:Listen to Feline Mussolini.
Strict31 wrote:You're goddamned insane.
achilles wrote:Pay no attention to Cat-Scratch people; he's insane from all that cat-nip.
Lord Simian wrote:"Us"? This is YOUR Kongdamn fault, mister "Bets on when this place will break again"....
Psivage wrote:Don't trust a cat. They are always up to no good.
Ragnascratch is coming... maybe./人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\
-
Benderbrau

- Twenty-Something
-
- Posts: 56141
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:18 am
- Location: Your Moms Bedroom
- Title: Proud Underachiever
by Benderbrau » Sun Feb 19, 2012 2:21 am
If you didn't like it then go get one of the 15 other Star Wars porns that have been made over the years.


"Dude, I bow down to you, you are the worlds greatest ballbuster." -
Jude Terror"Sorry, nate! I think you automatically lose all arguments from now on, simply due to the fact that the only person willing to back you up is batshit insane!" -
Dragavon"Everything I know I learned from reading your posts." -
Nietoperz
-
Evan Meadow
- Motherfucker from Hell
-
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:47 am
by Evan Meadow » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:19 am
Zechs wrote:Oh sure I post the thread and I get labeled the one obsessed. Hey if their doing female Stormtroopers I demand to see them first! I mean come on. I was expecting some Rebel alliance on Empire action during that opening scene. Instead we people shooting guns at each other.

Orgy scene's in the cantina.
-
Evan Meadow
- Motherfucker from Hell
-
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:47 am
by Evan Meadow » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:21 am
nietoperz wrote:
I know that, but surely there has to be more to a parody than a fairly slavish copy of the original with some sex added for good measure. I mean, he word 'parody' implies some amount of humour and/or satire.
That means you'd actually have to sit through the film and listen to the dialogue besides focusing on the sex scenes.
From what I've heard, they do a good job making jokes about the prequels while going through this one.
-
Evan Meadow
- Motherfucker from Hell
-
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:47 am
by Evan Meadow » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:23 am
Cat-Scratch wrote:
But the brother thing didn't?
LOL well it is only the first film. They don't know they're related yet.
If they do parodies of the other two films, you know by Jedi at some point they'll have one of those "Wait we're related?" moments broken up by some reference to the Appalachian Mountains and their inhabitants therein.
-
PDH
- rubber spoon
-
- Posts: 6690
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:10 pm
by PDH » Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:19 am
Strict31 wrote:Given how little female presence is in the source material of these various porn parodies, it's really kinda strange how obsessed with them some of you guys (ZECHS) are.
Yeah and this pretty much sums up my indifference to them. I mean, the JLA one was like six guys or something as near as I could see. They're all just complete sausage factories.
-
guitarsmashley

- Fagorstorm
-
- Posts: 13134
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:53 pm
- Title: Self Important
by guitarsmashley » Sun Feb 19, 2012 12:59 pm
Cat-Scratch wrote:
But the brother thing didn't?
haven't seen it, just the one scene. *Creeps*
doombug wrote:You really are the george carlin of the outhouse. that's fucking hilarious.
I feel like a condemned building with a brand new flag pole.
- Les Paul

-
Cat-Scratch

- A Damn Cuddly Beast
-
- Posts: 60618
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
- Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\
by Cat-Scratch » Sun Feb 19, 2012 2:20 pm
Evan Meadow wrote:
LOL well it is only the first film. They don't know they're related yet.
If they do parodies of the other two films, you know by Jedi at some point they'll have one of those "Wait we're related?" moments broken up by some reference to the Appalachian Mountains and their inhabitants therein.


Strict31 wrote:To quote Hunter S. Thompson, there is nothing more despicable than a cat in the depths of a nip binge..
Strict31 wrote:Listen to Feline Mussolini.
Strict31 wrote:You're goddamned insane.
achilles wrote:Pay no attention to Cat-Scratch people; he's insane from all that cat-nip.
Lord Simian wrote:"Us"? This is YOUR Kongdamn fault, mister "Bets on when this place will break again"....
Psivage wrote:Don't trust a cat. They are always up to no good.
Ragnascratch is coming... maybe./人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\
leave a comment with facebook
Return to The Asylum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: e_galston, FaceBook [Linkcheck], Google [Bot], Juan Cena, Midas, MSN NewsBlogs, Stalzer2002 and 55 guests