The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

by **GLX** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:26 pm

Has anyone here seen this film?

by **Rockman** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:09 pm

It has recieved horrid reviews

by **GLX** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:16 pm

Rockman wrote:It has recieved horrid reviews

That's just the old folks saying that, man. They can't handle bomb ass parties.

/teen'd

by **avengingtitan** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:22 pm

I really wanna see it.

by **Royal Nonesuch** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:08 pm

I can understand re-casting Matthew Broderick, but there isn't a single ape in that trailer. What a terrible remake!

by **TROY** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:52 pm

I have absolutely no interest in seeing this shit.

by **Chris** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:00 pm

avengingtitan wrote:I really wanna see it.

This does not surprise me. You're second to AMS on the list of people with shitty movie tastes on here.

by **avengingtitan** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:01 pm

Holland Oats wrote:
This does not surprise me. You're second to AMS on the list of people with shitty movie tastes on here.

Eh. I liked Old school and The Hangover and its from the same dude. I'm not saying its gonna be good but I'm interested.

by **GLX** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:02 pm

avengingtitan wrote:Eh. I liked Old school and The Hangover and its from the same dude. I'm not saying its gonna be good but I'm interested.

Technically, he's the producer. Here's the wiki page if you want to save some cash:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_X_(2012_film)

by **Chris** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:03 pm

avengingtitan wrote:Eh. I liked Old school and The Hangover and its from the same dude. I'm not saying its gonna be good but I'm interested.

He didn't direct this. He produced it, which basically just means nothing on the creative end of things.

A no-name directed this. His first movie or anything ever.

by **avengingtitan** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:10 pm

GLX wrote:
Technically, he's the producer. Here's the wiki page if you want to save some cash:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_X_(2012_film)

Cant wait to see it.
True but I trust him.

by **avengingtitan** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:14 pm

Holland Oats wrote:
He didn't direct this. He produced it, which basically just means nothing on the creative end of things.

A no-name directed this. His first movie or anything ever.

Actually the Producer is one of the main creative forces behind a film. In fact a lot of the time they are the people that have the idea and put up the money for it. You're talking about an EXECUTIVE producer, they have little creative input.

by **Chris** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:21 pm

avengingtitan wrote:Actually the Producer is one of the main creative forces behind a film. In fact a lot of the time they are the people that have the idea and put up the money for it. You're talking about an EXECUTIVE producer, they have little creative input.

Right.. put the money behind it. Promote it. Find a studio. Get it made.

He didn't write it. He didn't direct it.

The two biggest creative aspects.

by **avengingtitan** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:27 pm

Holland Oats wrote:
Right.. put the money behind it. Promote it. Find a studio. Get it made.

He didn't write it. He didn't direct it.

The two biggest creative aspects.

If you really believe that a very successful director just produced this flick with a first time director you're nuts.
Not to mention that a producer is on set EVERY day making sure that everything is right from creative aspects to making casting decisions.

by **Chris** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:33 pm

avengingtitan wrote:If you really believe that a very successful director just produced this flick with a first time director you're nuts.
Not to mention that a producer is on set EVERY day making sure that everything is right from creative aspects to making casting decisions.