The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

by **Punchy** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:51 pm

habitual wrote:
Excuses! All just excuses.

I almost feel obligated to write a counter review column to yours, I'll call it "Read it more than once reviews."

Hab

You try it and see how long it takes you, you see how fucking lazy I am.

by **Victorian Squid** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:52 pm

Punchy wrote:
I'm not lazy, and it's really starting to piss me off that you're repeatedly calling me so.

Has anyone else ever called you that?

by **Punchy** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:53 pm

Fat Ollie Weeks wrote:
You really only read your books once each week? Man, if I read a book I buy once it means I really hated it. I guess you buy more books than I do, I'd probably only read a lot of that stuff once too, etc.

For a comic book review, I would absolutely re-read a book every time. I think the one time I didn't was Lorna Relic Wrangler, it was just too bad.

I 'reviewed' 18 comics this week, and am doing a longer review for The Shade #6. That's 19 books, I don't have time to read them more than once, and frankly, I don't need to for most of them, because they make sense.

by **Punchy** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:54 pm

Fat Ollie Weeks wrote:
Has anyone else ever called you that?

Only my mother, but then everyone's mother calls them lazy sometimes.

by **habitual** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:55 pm

Punchy wrote:
You try it and see how long it takes you, you see how fucking lazy I am.

I already know how lazy you are, I read your review remember?

Hab

by **Punchy** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:57 pm

habitual wrote:
I already know how lazy you are, I read your review remember?

Hab

A lazy person wouldn't even write a review!

by **habitual** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:57 pm

Punchy wrote:
I 'reviewed' 18 comics this week, and am doing a longer review for The Shade #6. That's 19 books, I don't have time to read them more than once, and frankly, I don't need to for most of them, because they are written for 12 year olds, and not as complex as Fantastic Four.

Because I'm somewhat lazy.

Fixed for accuracy.

Hab

by **habitual** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:59 pm

Punchy wrote:
A lazy person wouldn't even write a review!

No, but, if they did, they would half ass it....

Hab

by **Victorian Squid** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:59 pm

Punchy wrote:
I 'reviewed' 18 comics this week, and am doing a longer review for The Shade #6. That's 19 books, I don't have time to read them more than once, and frankly, I don't need to for most of them, because they make sense.

That's a lot of comics, but I would probably read them twice. That's just me.

by **Punchy** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:01 pm

habitual wrote:
No, but, if they did, they would half ass it....

Hab

Seriously man, screw you, I work hard on these reviews, and it's not cool for you to constantly bash them and me. If you think they're wrong, you should go ahead and do a column or reviews, until then... get off my back, please?

by **habitual** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:06 pm

Punchy wrote:
Seriously man, screw you, I work hard on these reviews, and it's not cool for you to constantly bash them and me. If you think they're wrong, you should go ahead and do a column or reviews, until then... get off my back, please?

Seriously dude I get no enjoyment out of giving you shit, if anything it's a headache, like talking to a wall.

You're review I felt was a bit intellectually dishonest and that's all I said, I expect better of you.

Hab

by **alaska1125** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:09 pm

I don't know if Hickman's collected run would qualify as an omnibus, but it will be on my shelf if/when they do it.

by **Chris** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:41 pm

Punchy is pretty lazy, though.

by **Amoebas** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:59 pm

Cmon Hab. First you put up a defense that you didn't call Pucnhy "stupid" (inferring you don't stoop to those levels), but then you go on a multi-post tirade calling him "lazy" (which in the end is no different from calling "stupid").

And the whole time Pnchyu is right in that he reviewed the latest issue - not the entire run - and many many things were not explained in the Fantastic Four #604.

by **habitual** » Sun Mar 18, 2012 11:06 pm

Amoebas wrote:Cmon Hab. First you put up a defense that you didn't call Pucnhy "stupid" (inferring you don't stoop to those levels), but then you go on a multi-post tirade calling him "lazy" (which in the end is no different from calling "stupid").

And the whole time Pnchyu is right in that he reviewed the latest issue - not the entire run - and many many things were not explained in the Fantastic Four #604.

He is lazy.

And I never called him stupid. He said he couldn't remember what was going on and then said because of that it didn't make sense.

It did make sense, pretty much all of it, there might be one or two loose ends, which we've discussed earlier in the thread, but, it was entirely coherent and logical.

Hab