The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

by **Benderbrau** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:26 am

achilles wrote:
Yeah, well, you know them, so you can figure how it happened.

To quote the immortal Wesley Snipes, "Some motherf*ckers always got to ice skate uphill."

and then he was busted for tax evasion. I guess he was speaking from experience. :lol:

by **S.F. Jude Terror** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:29 am

Why you gotta quote a black man?

by **Cat-Scratch** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:50 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:Why you gotta quote a black man?

Line written by a white man, spoken by a black man...

by **Benderbrau** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:51 pm

Cat-Scratch wrote:
Line written by a white man, spoken by a black man...

Actually no. According to the DVD commentary Weslrey Snipes improvised that line.

by **US Agent** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:52 pm

Benderbrau wrote:Actually no. According to the DVD commentary Weslrey Snipes improvised that line.

Is he as truthful on commentary as he is on his taxes?

by **Benderbrau** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:57 pm

US Agent wrote:
Is he as truthful on commentary as he is on his taxes?

He wasn't the only one on the commentary track so I imagine that if he were lying someone would have corrected him.

by **Cat-Scratch** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:02 pm

Benderbrau wrote:He wasn't the only one on the commentary track so I imagine that if he were lying someone would have corrected him.

Well then, I guess Jude's complaint stands.

by **US Agent** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:04 pm

Benderbrau wrote:He wasn't the only one on the commentary track so I imagine that if he were lying someone would have corrected him.

Yes because there's nothing the star of a movie enjoys more when boosting his own ego is to have the writer or director sitting next to him throw him under the bus.

:lol:

by **Benderbrau** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:09 pm

US Agent wrote:
Yes because there's nothing the star of a movie enjoys more when boosting his own ego is to have the writer or director sitting next to him throw him under the bus.

I've seen it happens. It's pretty awesome...
"I remember adding that bit in there right there"
"Actually I think that was in the script"
"Oh...yeah...I guess it was"

:lol:

by **US Agent** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:11 pm

Benderbrau wrote:I've seen it happens. It's pretty awesome...
"I remember adding that bit in there right there"
"Actually I think that was in the script"
"Oh...yeah...I guess it was"

I know it's a little off subject, but wasn't Snipes kind of a dick when it came to promoting the third Blade? Like he wouldn't do the pressers or any of the promotions. I'll have to look it up.

by **Benderbrau** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:12 pm

US Agent wrote:

I know it's a little off subject, but wasn't Snipes kind of a dick when it came to promoting the third Blade? Like he wouldn't do the pressers or any of the promotions. I'll have to look it up.

I wouldn't blame him, that movie stunk. I think Norton pulls the same shit IIRC.

by **habitual** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:36 pm

achilles wrote:
Only if you buy the line that the shooting was completely based on race, and that the kid was minding his own business when he was shot, instead of actively trying to murder Zimmerman. Both positions have been fairly well discredited to this point.

It's like a shooting out here by the cops, in which they shot an unarmed black kid who they say was reaching for his waistband at the time. There's a huge stink locally about this saintly kid who got shot. The background was that the saintly kid had robbed a Mexican guy's car of a number of valuables, and the Mexican guy had called the cops on him, lying by saying he was armed, claiming he figured it would get a faster response time, (which apparently it did). So the cops were chasing a guy they thought was armed, who made a suspicious movement. And he got shot for it.

To here the kid's family and friends and the black community, the kid was out delivering meals to the elderly in between visiting sick kids at the local hospital, rather than robbing cars. The media too. But he wouldn't have been shot if he hadn't been committing a crime in the first place. The Mexican guy BTW wasn't charged. And the cops are coming under a ton of criticism by the black community.

In Martin's case, if he hadn't jumped Zimmerman and pounded his head into the ground repeatedly, he would still be here, according the the available physical and other evidence at this point.

There's no proof of any of that. That's why he's running, he's guilty.

Hab

by **habitual** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:37 pm

Snug wrote:
Well dip me in strawberries and color me shocked. I would have expected you to say that the guys who got their beer stolen should have just stayed put and let the cops handle it. I am pleasantly surprised that you support their choice to pursue the Beer Thieves.

The guy that got his beer stolen was assaulted with a wrench i.e. a deadly weapon, and their were witnesses to the assault, the two cases aren't at all comparable.

Hab

by **achilles** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:15 pm

Benderbrau wrote:and then he was busted for tax evasion. I guess he was speaking from experience.

The truly awesome thing was, if he'd just been contrite, and said he made a mistake, and asked for time to pay what he owed, they probably would have given it to him, and he never would have seen the inside of a jail. Instead, be basically thumbed his nose at them and dared them to jail him.

by **achilles** » Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:17 pm

habitual wrote:

There's no proof of any of that. That's why he's running, he's guilty.

Hab

True, there's no proof, but there IS physical evidence. Which is more than there is for any of the "racist murder" thing the media and the kid's family have been pushing. As for his "running", there's no proof he's "running" at all, simply that his whereabouts are not known. I'd hide too if I were him, with all the people out to kill him. But nice to know you've already convicted him. Maybe a trial could be held after you execute him? :roll: