The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

by **mrorangesoda** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:01 pm

I think with all the billion dollar grosses that most fans actually pay to see Chris Nolan movies.

by **Rockman** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:31 pm

mrorangesoda wrote:I think with all the billion dollar grosses that most fans actually pay to see Chris Nolan movies.

That rant should really not be read by anybody.

by **doombug** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:38 pm

Personally I think she looks a lot like Julie Newmar in a really great way.

by **Spidey-Man** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:47 am

She’s not an attractive woman and looks very much like a regular person.Catwoman though is sexy. Attractiveness is not the issue per se.

sexiness is 75% attitude so its all in how the part is written and performed.

by **Spidey-Man** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:55 am

I demand this scene, from Catowman's first appearance, be in the movie

by **Jubilee** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:57 am

I trust Nolan after he made the best superhero franchise by far, with his first two batman films.

He knows all about the grim and gritty. He knows all about the dark tone. I trust him to pull this off.

by **chap22** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:40 am

who cares about ears, so long as she has tits?

/theinternet'd

by **GOSD** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:40 am

e_galston wrote:But Maggie was million times better than Katie Holmes

Umm..no.

by **chap22** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:17 am

GOSD wrote:Umm..no.

no, i agree with galston...Maggie IS a million times the actress Katie is. but my dog wouldn't lick Maggie's face...and she licks her own ass.

by **Chesscub** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:35 am

Timbales wrote:I like that the ears serve a purpose.

The way your ears serve a purpose? :twisted:

by **Mr. Poolman** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:53 am

Not good enough.
Case in point:

by **Punchy** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:56 am

So last week the Catwoman in the comics is too sexy, and now the Catwoman in the movies isn't sexy enough?

When did comics fans become the the Goldilocks of masturbation?

by **Mr. Poolman** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:01 am

Punchy wrote:So last week the Catwoman in the comics is too sexy, and now the Catwoman in the movies isn't sexy enough?

When did comics fans become the the Goldilocks of masturbation?

Tell me, is it the same to find a real woman attractive than to find a drawing of a woman atractive?

by **Punchy** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:06 am

Mr. Poolman wrote:Tell me, is it the same to find a real woman attractive than to find a drawing of a woman atractive?

No, but it is funny, the same people who were aghast at how badly Catwoman represented women and how it was sexist, are now moaning that the actress playing the character in a movie isn't hot enough. Anne Hathaway is a real women, and surely it's worse to objectify her than a drawing of one?

by **Mr. Poolman** » Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:09 am

Punchy wrote:
No, but it is funny, the same people who were aghast at how badly Catwoman represented women and how it was sexist, are now moaning that the actress playing the character in a movie isn't hot enough. Anne Hathaway is a real women, and surely it's worse to objectify her than a drawing of one?

But be aware that people were against Catwoman's portrayal on last week's book.
Trust me, if the same scene is done on the movie, you will see similar reactions as well.