Advertisement

Doctor Who Thread

This is the main board on The Outhouse, where Outhousers talk about everything. No topics are off limits, and it doesn't have to be about comics. All the topics from the other boards also show up in The Asylum, so you never have to leave1

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 34445
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 76 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Title: Shitlord


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby Punchy » Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:30 pm

Basically, I want more Rory punching Hitler and the hilarious jellyfish monsters and less wibbly-wobbly continuity bollocks.

Advertisement

Dragavon
User avatar
Podcaster
 
Posts: 18511
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:35 am
Location: NJ
Title: Married
Formerly: Ben Reilly


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby Dragavon » Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:45 pm

This episode was decent. Except for a few things.

1. Hitler got treated as comedy relief.
2. Mels should have been around longer. This should maybe have happened later in the season, perhaps the last episode.
3. :smt011 at Amy giving up on her child.
Image

superfictious
User avatar
Humuhumunukunukuapuaa
 
Posts: 10399
Likes: 86 posts
Liked in: 180 posts
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:38 pm
Title: superfictious.wordpress.com


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby superfictious » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:03 am

So does this explain why the Doctor no longer regenerates?

Chris
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 41354
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 41 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:10 pm
Title: Stuff Writer
Formerly: Chris


Re: Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby Chris » Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:27 am

False Prophet wrote:So does this explain why the Doctor no longer regenerates?

Do you mean River? Then yes.
Image

superfictious
User avatar
Humuhumunukunukuapuaa
 
Posts: 10399
Likes: 86 posts
Liked in: 180 posts
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:38 pm
Title: superfictious.wordpress.com


Re: Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby superfictious » Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:35 am

Leviticus Payne wrote:Do you mean River? Then yes.


No I mean the Doctor too, considering what happens in The Impossible Astronaut.

nietoperz
User avatar
The Goddamn Bat-min
 
Posts: 42741
Likes: 210 posts
Liked in: 192 posts
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 5:36 pm
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Title: Forum Manager


Re: Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby nietoperz » Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:12 am

False Prophet wrote:
No I mean the Doctor too, considering what happens in The Impossible Astronaut.


No - it has been established that if The Doctor is killed outright before the regeneration cycle completes then he is dead for good (witness 'Turn Left' when we see the Doctor's body after he died killing the Rachnoss under the Thames with no Donna Noble to pull him out in time). In 'The Impossible Astronaut' he starts to regenerate, but the Astronaut shoots him again before he is able to do so, thereby killing him outright.
Image

superfictious
User avatar
Humuhumunukunukuapuaa
 
Posts: 10399
Likes: 86 posts
Liked in: 180 posts
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:38 pm
Title: superfictious.wordpress.com


Re: Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby superfictious » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:13 pm

nietoperz wrote:
No - it has been established that if The Doctor is killed outright before the regeneration cycle completes then he is dead for good (witness 'Turn Left' when we see the Doctor's body after he died killing the Rachnoss under the Thames with no Donna Noble to pull him out in time). In 'The Impossible Astronaut' he starts to regenerate, but the Astronaut shoots him again before he is able to do so, thereby killing him outright.


Ah, ok. I understand now.

Amoebas
User avatar
Son of Stein
 
Posts: 20615
Likes: 192 posts
Liked in: 373 posts
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:27 pm
Location: Auburn, MA
Title: Amorphous Anomoly


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby Amoebas » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:20 pm

A great episode all around.

The only things I would have done differently would be to have Melz have a cameo back at their wedding and second, I would have added more time travel and continuity to make Punchy's head explode.

The Old Doctor
User avatar
A Damn Cuddly Beast
 
Posts: 67123
Likes: 992 posts
Liked in: 763 posts
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby The Old Doctor » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:26 pm

Melz was hot.

But this episode threw a bit of a spanner into the works as well as that one clue over again.

The clue is that time can be re-written. They've said it several times now since Matt Smith began as the Doctor.

The spanner is that it appears as though there are now only a limited number of regenerations again. But then, maybe that was River as she was not a true Time Lord.

Also, I thought it was creepy the way Robot Amy turned her head when she first rode up on the cycle.
"Why are you pointing your screwdrivers like that? They're scientific instruments, not water pistols."
"Oh, the pointing again! They're screwdrivers! What are you going to do? Assemble a cabinet at them?"
"Are you capable of speaking without flapping your hands about?"
""Timey" what? "Timey wimey"?"

Image
IvCNuB4 wrote:The Old Doctor is Cat-Scratch ?
Well that explains a lot :lol:

PDH
penile prisoner
 
Posts: 7212
Likes: 34 posts
Liked in: 64 posts
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 11:10 am


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby PDH » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:30 pm

Cat-Scratch wrote:Also, I thought it was creepy the way Robot Amy turned her head when she first rode up on the cycle.


They should keep that thing around. It could come in handy if someone has to be perceived as being murdered, say.

Lord Ice
User avatar
Motherfucker from Hell
 
Posts: 2758
Likes: 33 posts
Liked in: 119 posts
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 3:45 pm


Online


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby Lord Ice » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:39 pm

Nice holographic cameos of past companions, great response with the Donna one.

But who on the show is a big Mike Nichols fan?
Image

The Old Doctor
User avatar
A Damn Cuddly Beast
 
Posts: 67123
Likes: 992 posts
Liked in: 763 posts
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby The Old Doctor » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:42 pm

PDH wrote:
They should keep that thing around. It could come in handy if someone has to be perceived as being murdered, say.


I was wondering what happened to it. The owners did not blow it up or such. So DID the Doctor and company keep it? I suspect so.
"Why are you pointing your screwdrivers like that? They're scientific instruments, not water pistols."
"Oh, the pointing again! They're screwdrivers! What are you going to do? Assemble a cabinet at them?"
"Are you capable of speaking without flapping your hands about?"
""Timey" what? "Timey wimey"?"

Image
IvCNuB4 wrote:The Old Doctor is Cat-Scratch ?
Well that explains a lot :lol:

Strict31
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 41969
Likes: 70 posts
Liked in: 167 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:41 am
Title: Ain't enough space bitches


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby Strict31 » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:47 pm

I have a question:

So in this episode, Melody Pond is in her early twenties when she regenerates, and takes on the appearance of a woman in her late 40s.

She has no more regenerations allowed to her.

Ignoring for a moment her death in the Library, in theory, would she live out the lifespan of a person in her 20s? Or would she live out the lifespan of a person in her late 40s? Would she visibly and physically age? Or would she remain the same appearance and at the same level of physical ability throughout the rest of her Time Lord lifespan?

I don't really have a grasp on how Time Lords age.
Image

"You must be proud, bold, pleasant, resolute,
And now and then stab, as occasion serves."


Edward II: Act 2 Scene 1, by Christopher Marlowe

Strict31
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 41969
Likes: 70 posts
Liked in: 167 posts
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:41 am
Title: Ain't enough space bitches


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby Strict31 » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:50 pm

PDH wrote:
They should keep that thing around. It could come in handy if someone has to be perceived as being murdered, say.


Well, presumably, the Flesh biotech is still out there as well.
Image

"You must be proud, bold, pleasant, resolute,
And now and then stab, as occasion serves."


Edward II: Act 2 Scene 1, by Christopher Marlowe

nietoperz
User avatar
The Goddamn Bat-min
 
Posts: 42741
Likes: 210 posts
Liked in: 192 posts
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 5:36 pm
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Title: Forum Manager


Re: Doctor Who Thread

Postby nietoperz » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:58 pm

Strict31 wrote:I have a question:

So in this episode, Melody Pond is in her early twenties when she regenerates, and takes on the appearance of a woman in her late 40s.

She has no more regenerations allowed to her.

Ignoring for a moment her death in the Library, in theory, would she live out the lifespan of a person in her 20s? Or would she live out the lifespan of a person in her late 40s? Would she visibly and physically age? Or would she remain the same appearance and at the same level of physical ability throughout the rest of her Time Lord lifespan?

I don't really have a grasp on how Time Lords age.

She would age very slowly. The first Doctor collapsed due to old age, but he was many centuries old by that point despite only looking like a relatively old human.

leave a comment with facebook

PreviousNext

Return to The Asylum



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests

Advertisement