The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

by **habitual** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:48 pm

Anything that can overshadow Andrew Garfield's shitty Spider-man can only be good for the film.

Hab

by **Keb** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:56 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:How many of you could do better?

I think she looks fine. Like a normal girl. Watch less porn.

Like winterfolk "fine" or summerfolk "fyne! (mmhmm!)"?

by **holtom2000** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:57 pm

bkthomson wrote:This is just a not very flattering picture of her. Look her up on IMDB she is not as extremely attractive as Emma Stone but she is attractive.

I agree. She's cute. Little Ginny, all grown up...
Hmm, time for a Harry Potter marathon?

by **bkthomson** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:06 pm

holtom2000 wrote:I agree. She's cute. Little Ginny, all grown up...
Hmm, time for a Harry Potter marathon?

Its not Ginny though. . . that is the joke to the article.

by **bkthomson** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:06 pm

jaxstraww wrote:I rather see J Lo as MJ.....

No idea what they are thinking here........while super hot is not needed this is a poor choice for that character. Why not cast melissa mccarthy if we are looking for great personality.

Sent from my SPH-M930BST using Tapatalk 2

Get. Help. Now.

by **MrBlack** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:11 pm

bkthomson wrote:
Its not Ginny though. . . that is the joke to the article.

Yeah.

It's actually Ron in drag.

by **Grayson** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:12 pm

Damn, now I am a little disappointed that the actual actress who played Ginny Weasley, Bonnie Wright isn't playing Mary Jane. :-(

In any case, Shailene Woodley may not be anybody's first choice to play Mary Jane but at least she is better looking than Kirsten Dunst. Now all we have to do is hope that Shailene can play a better Mary Jane and honestly, that shouldn't be too hard. All she has to do is have more than 2 emotions and she'll surpass snaggletooth on the acting front as well.

by **S.F. Jude Terror** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:24 pm

Not a single one of you would turn down Kirsten Dunst.

by **False Prophet** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:26 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:Not a single one of you would turn down Kirsten Dunst.

Hawtness ain't a prerequisite to fuckability.

by **Grayson** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:28 pm

jaxstraww wrote:Once you see that white webbing against her olive skin......you will start to agree with me and hate yourself for even doubting my casting calls.

J-Lo is simply one step above a Kardashian. I don't know how she did it but unlike the Kardashians she was actually able to convince some people that she had something resembling talent. She doesn't but there are still a few people convinced that she does.

by **Grayson** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:29 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:Not a single one of you would turn down Kirsten Dunst.

I would and I actually stand by that statement.

by **bkthomson** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:30 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:Not a single one of you would turn down Kirsten Dunst.

Yes I would, as she is not my wife.

by **S.F. Jude Terror** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:31 pm

bkthomson wrote:Yes I would, as she is not my wife.

You know what I meant.

by **bkthomson** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:36 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:
You know what I meant.

by **Keb** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:39 pm

Grayson wrote:

J-Lo is simply one step above a Kardashian. I don't know how she did it but unlike the Kardashians she was actually able to convince some people that she had something resembling talent. She doesn't but there are still a few people convinced that she does.

I liked her as Fly Girl #3 back in the day.