Wednesday, May 25, 2016 • Morning Edition • "The number two comic book website."

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!


Henry Cavill is the new Superman.

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

User avatar

48THRiLLS

Review Grouper

Postby 48THRiLLS » Sun Jan 30, 2011 4:57 pm

As a casual Superman fan and someone who doesn't read his comics, I will go see this. The guy looks the role and it doesn't matter to me at all if he is British and I am not sure why it matters to anyone at all :smt017
User avatar

Jack Burton

biny little tird

Postby Jack Burton » Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:22 pm

Punchy wrote:A British Superman?

Even as a Brit I'm uncomfortable with this, Superman is an American icon, and as such, should be portrayed by an American.


Eh. If an American can play Sherlock Holmes than a Brit can play Superman.
User avatar

Keb

<( ' . ' )>

Postby Keb » Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:37 pm

AMS wrote:The fact that Snyder is directing this though, right off the bat tells me I probably won't like it.

Yup.

After what Watchmen was and what it could have been, I won't pay to see this. I don't need a Superman softcore porn scene to invade my mind. As a director, Synder does some good things (visually, his movies are fantastic, I loved all the colours and visuals in 300), but the final product doesn't work.
User avatar

MrBlack

WTF is this rank?

Postby MrBlack » Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:43 pm

Keb wrote:Yup.

After what Watchmen was and what it could have been, I won't pay to see this. I don't need a Superman softcore porn scene to invade my mind. As a director, Synder does some good things (visually, his movies are fantastic, I loved all the colours and visuals in 300), but the final product doesn't work.

Watchmen was ultimately brought down by the weight of the source material. Snyder was going for a faithful retelling of the comic, and the film suffered for it. That said, the visuals were amazing (the opening montage is still one of the greatest things I have ever seen in a theater), and he could do a hell of a lot with Superman. I'm willing to wait and see.

As for the soft-core porn, that was in the original comic so I can't exactly blame Snyder for it.
User avatar

Regulator

Motherfucker from Hell

Postby Regulator » Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:47 pm

What could Watchmen really have been, besides 10 hours long?
User avatar

Timbales

Fisty McDigger

Postby Timbales » Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:53 pm

MrBlack wrote:


agreed

I think he did an admirable job with turning the source material into a movie.
User avatar

Keb

<( ' . ' )>

Postby Keb » Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:14 pm

MrBlack wrote:Watchmen was ultimately brought down by the weight of the source material. Snyder was going for a faithful retelling of the comic, and the film suffered for it. That said, the visuals were amazing (the opening montage is still one of the greatest things I have ever seen in a theater), and he could do a hell of a lot with Superman. I'm willing to wait and see.

As for the soft-core porn, that was in the original comic so I can't exactly blame Snyder for it.

It was like four panels long and NOT set to Leonard Cohen music. Weren't a lot of shots of Nite Owl giving it to Silk Spectre. Shit was hella fucked up.
User avatar

Punchy

Staff Writer

Postby Punchy » Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:23 pm

bkthomson wrote:

Ok are you serious here? Just want to be sure. I understand what you are saying, though I do diagree, but I see your point so it is not something that I feel needs to debated until someone leaves. The outhouse is not the thunderdome. :)

Really I do not care what nationality the actor is as long as that person does a good job becoming that character in the movie and make me believe he or she embodies what is in the comics that is fine with me. Hugh Jackman is a good example of what I mean with his portrail of Wolverine.


Course I'm serious.

I don't have a problem with actors playing characters of different nationalities in general, but this is Superman, it's a special case.
User avatar

Greg

Rain Partier

Postby Greg » Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:24 pm

Keb wrote:It was like four panels long and NOT set to Leonard Cohen music. Weren't a lot of shots of Nite Owl giving it to Silk Spectre. Shit was hella fucked up.


I didn't mind it. :smt102
User avatar

Punchy

Staff Writer

Postby Punchy » Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:26 pm

Chris wrote:
But.. it's acting. Does it honestly matter to you that this guy has a British accent when he's on some late night talk show hyping the movie?

I mean, if he can't pull off a convincing American accent, then I can see your point.. but otherwise, it just seems like a really pointless complaint.

What matters is what is on the screen, not what's off.


What matters is that Superman is an American Icon and should be portrayed by an American. It's not about the acting, it's about the nature of this one character in particular. I don't have a problem with it when it's Batman or Spider-Man being played by Brits, because those characters aren't explicitly stated to stand for 'The American Way' and aren't constantly posed with the Stars and Stripes.

Superman is a special case.
User avatar

Greg

Rain Partier

Postby Greg » Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:29 pm

:lol:
User avatar

Punchy

Staff Writer

Postby Punchy » Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:31 pm

Greg wrote::lol:


How is that funny?

I can't believe I'm the only person who thinks this! I'm not even American!
User avatar

Chris

Rain Partier

Postby Chris » Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:33 pm

Punchy wrote:
What matters is that Superman is an American Icon and should be portrayed by an American. It's not about the acting, it's about the nature of this one character in particular. I don't have a problem with it when it's Batman or Spider-Man being played by Brits, because those characters aren't explicitly stated to stand for 'The American Way' and aren't constantly posed with the Stars and Stripes.

Superman is a special case.


That's ridiculous. I don't see why anyone would mix the CHARACTER and the ACTOR portraying him up outside of the movie.

It doesn't matter what Superman stands for. That wouldn't change just because some British guy is playing him. It's what actors do.

And realistically, the average joe probably wouldn't even know he's not American until they heard him doing an interview or something, assuming he can do a good American accent for the movie.
User avatar

Chris

Rain Partier

Postby Chris » Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:33 pm

Punchy wrote:
How is that funny?

I can't believe I'm the only person who thinks this! I'm not even American!


You're definitely not the only one thinking this, because I remember discussions about the same thing when there were British actors up for the role of Captain America. And the British angle has already been played up in news reports about Cavill's casting.

It's just a silly stance, regardless of who thinks it.
User avatar

Keb

<( ' . ' )>

Postby Keb » Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:38 pm

Wasn't one of Superman's creators a Canadian?

leave a comment with facebook


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FaceBook [Linkcheck], GiveWarAChance, Paperwren and 38 guests