The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

by **muddyglass** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:13 pm

Man of Tomorrow wrote:Especially if, as in our country, half the pregnancies are unplanned.

are you speaking from personal experience?

by **Strict31** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:13 pm

Man of Tomorrow wrote:Regardless of whether such laws/restrictions are immoral/anti-freedom, the next question becomes enforceability.

Do you for sterliize after X number of kids? When people violate it, as they will, what do you do? Especially if, as in our country, half the pregnancies are unplanned.

Kill the extra kid? Force them to undergo sterilization? Tax them so badly to discourage others from violating it, though poverty would be assured for those that do for them and their children? Take away the kid and distribute to people who have under the quota/can't have kids? Forced abortions?

This is easily solved by determining the penalty for violation will be death of both the offending child and the parents. That solution is composed almost completely of win.

In the U.S., witha Supreme Court that has found an inherent right to privacy (like say for abortion), how do you square such laws with the Constitution?

The solution is again, easy. You simply elect me as Emperor for Life. I shall immediately proceed to..."square"...all laws with this Constitution of which you blather.

by **Apache Chef** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:14 pm

Man of Tomorrow wrote:Regardless of whether such laws/restrictions are immoral/anti-freedom, the next question becomes enforceability.

Do you for sterliize after X number of kids? When people violate it, as they will, what do you do? Especially if, as in our country, half the pregnancies are unplanned.

Kill the extra kid? Force them to undergo sterilization? Tax them so badly to discourage others from violating it, though poverty would be assured for those that do for them and their children? Take away the kid and distribute to people who have under the quota/can't have kids? Forced abortions?

In the U.S., witha Supreme Court that has found an inherent right to privacy (like say for abortion), how do you square such laws with the Constitution? If you can't force someone to carry a baby to term, how do you force them not to have kids?

Agreed.

I'd be the first to say that people have way too many kids, but it's their right to do so. And taking that away would violate just about every ideal the US was founded on.

by **daitong** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:14 pm

Maybe if it's done through extraordinary rendition it'll be ok.

by **Spidey-Man** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:16 pm

muddyglass wrote::shock: are you speaking from personal experience?

Not my experience.

by **toolverine** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:16 pm

Save this thread, its the only time spiderrob will ever claim to care about human rights. Mr. Amnesty International for the day!

by **habitual** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:17 pm

toolverine wrote:Save this thread, its the only time spiderrob will ever claim to care about human rights. Mr. Amnesty International for the day!

Rob is going to be the Ainsley Hayes for the Obama administration :-D

Hab

by **Spidey-Man** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:24 pm

toolverine wrote:Save this thread, its the only time spiderrob will ever claim to care about human rights. Mr. Amnesty International for the day!

You don't have to be part of Amnesty International to see "worldwide" restrictions as monstrous.

that's different than "human rights" for terrorists.

by **toolverine** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:29 pm

Man of Tomorrow wrote:You don't have to be part of Amnesty International to see "worldwide" restrictions as monstrous.

that's different than "human rights" for terrorists.

Which no one mentioned. :lol:

by **Spidey-Man** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:29 pm

toolverine wrote:Let's not get started on how some religious people use a bastardized form of Manifest Destiny to determine how many kids they should have.

Actually, I'd like to hear more about this. What is this about?

by **Spidey-Man** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:30 pm

toolverine wrote:Which no one mentioned.

I assume you were referring to some of our Iraq/Al Qaeda/Gitmo type discussions. If I was wrong, I am sorry.

by **Strict31** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:34 pm

Man of Tomorrow wrote:I assume you were referring to some of our Iraq/Al Qaeda/Gitmo type discussions. If I was wrong, I am sorry.

Goddamn it, stop apologizing and stab him!

by **Insane Genis** » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:35 pm

Man of Tomorrow wrote:Actually, I'd like to hear more about this. What is this about?

Be fruitful and multiply.

I just joined a conspiracy to change all video rentals you rent or buy for the rest of your life to be turned into gay porn. I hope these actions will prevent you from wanting to procreate.