Monday, August 21, 2017 • Morning Edition • "Still Kardashian free!"

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!

Skip to content

Advertisement

Jessica Alba boobs...

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

User avatar

AntiLogic

Factor 8

Postby AntiLogic » Tue May 13, 2008 2:40 am

This is not my work... just something I found on the net:
Image
User avatar

AntiLogic

Factor 8

Postby AntiLogic » Tue May 13, 2008 2:42 am

Image
User avatar

Doc Jon

Rain Partier

Postby Doc Jon » Tue May 13, 2008 2:59 am

I have to start watching the jokes I make around here.:p

That bikini one is stellar though.

blagblag

Designer Interactive

Postby blagblag » Tue May 13, 2008 9:08 am

awesome.
User avatar

SuperginraiX

Outhouse Editor

Postby SuperginraiX » Tue May 13, 2008 12:08 pm

Not that I'm complaining... TOO much... but why are we suddenly showing partial nudity on here?

(very well done, but I figured that was the line we weren't crossing...)
User avatar

Doc Jon

Rain Partier

Postby Doc Jon » Tue May 13, 2008 12:14 pm

Well, I draw the line at pornography, and I guess I just don't figure that topless is a big deal.

I don't know, is that offensive to anyone? We can post a link or something. I guess breasts just don't strike me as a problem. I find it funny that people were disappointed that they could see all of Megan Fox's breast, but the nipple.

What do people think?

blagblag

Designer Interactive

Postby blagblag » Tue May 13, 2008 2:43 pm

yeah boobs are just boobs. we all have em, females just have bigger ones. I don't even think tasteful full-frontal nudity would be inappropriate. Not that I'm going to go paste naked women pics in here or anything, but if I drew a naked angel or something or posted one of those anatomical reference studies where the model is nude, i don't think that would constitute "pornography". It's not my forum of course but I'd think a good guideline on nudity would be that the nudity itself was not being used strictly for sexual arousal but for some other purpose (art, reference, etc...).

...except in the case of boobs, since the latest boob pics obviously weren't meant for anything but enjoyment. :) I could see how a spread legged naked pic could be inappropriate. (well, not so much inappropriate as much as there's no reason for it to be Here, when there's billions of other places to see that sort of thing)
User avatar

SuperginraiX

Outhouse Editor

Postby SuperginraiX » Tue May 13, 2008 3:04 pm

Cool cool.

Don't mean to be the prude in the room. I like a nice set of boobs as much as the next heterosexual male.

Just figured someone's gotta play devil's advocate. Homer's top score is damn high.
User avatar

Doc Jon

Rain Partier

Postby Doc Jon » Tue May 13, 2008 6:20 pm

I guess we'll just take it on a case by case basis.:)
User avatar

AntiLogic

Factor 8

Postby AntiLogic » Tue May 13, 2008 6:24 pm

dick buff wrote:yeah boobs are just boobs. we all have em, females just have bigger ones. I don't even think tasteful full-frontal nudity would be inappropriate. Not that I'm going to go paste naked women pics in here or anything, but if I drew a naked angel or something or posted one of those anatomical reference studies where the model is nude, i don't think that would constitute "pornography". It's not my forum of course but I'd think a good guideline on nudity would be that the nudity itself was not being used strictly for sexual arousal but for some other purpose (art, reference, etc...).

...except in the case of boobs, since the latest boob pics obviously weren't meant for anything but enjoyment. :) I could see how a spread legged naked pic could be inappropriate. (well, not so much inappropriate as much as there's no reason for it to be Here, when there's billions of other places to see that sort of thing)


Yeah, but by your rational here, if it is a refernece diagramical photograph that is not meant for pornographic pleasures... then it's ok to post it here... whereas, I disagree, because this image right here falls under your strictest rules, but frankly, it's simply not appropriate to post here, Dick... http://www.joeschmidt.com/img/carebears.jpg

;D
User avatar

Doc Jon

Rain Partier

Postby Doc Jon » Tue May 13, 2008 6:26 pm

Oh good god in heaven! You could have warned me!

I just wasn't prepared to see that at this moment.

"It's so angry!"
User avatar

AntiLogic

Factor 8

Postby AntiLogic » Tue May 13, 2008 6:54 pm

jsalwen wrote:Oh good god in heaven! You could have warned me!

I just wasn't prepared to see that at this moment.

"It's so angry!"


Well, that's exactly what I'm saying... that's TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE! How dare Dick make such a suggestion! ;)
User avatar

Doc Jon

Rain Partier

Postby Doc Jon » Tue May 13, 2008 7:04 pm

So angry...
User avatar

AntiLogic

Factor 8

Postby AntiLogic » Tue May 13, 2008 7:07 pm

Why do you call God's holy creation of perpetual life, "angry"???

Would u prefer I remove the link? I'm not looking to sink the boat... just rock it a bit. :)
User avatar

AntiLogic

Factor 8

Postby AntiLogic » Tue May 13, 2008 7:36 pm

Fine.... I changed the link to something more your speed :P :D

leave a comment with facebook

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FaceBook [Linkcheck], GiveWarAChance, Google [Bot], Grayson and 0 guests

Follow Us

Follow TheOuthousers on Twitter

Follow TheOuthouse on Facebook

RSS Digest Feed

Ads:


Support our sponsors: Double Take


Advertisement