The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

[pedi]

This is not my work... just something I found on the net:

[pedi]

[Doc Jon]

I have to start watching the jokes I make around here.:p

That bikini one is stellar though.

[dick buff]

awesome.

[SuperginraiX]

Not that I'm complaining... TOO much... but why are we suddenly showing partial nudity on here?

(very well done, but I figured that was the line we weren't crossing...)

[Doc Jon]

Well, I draw the line at pornography, and I guess I just don't figure that topless is a big deal.

I don't know, is that offensive to anyone? We can post a link or something. I guess breasts just don't strike me as a problem. I find it funny that people were disappointed that they could see all of Megan Fox's breast, but the nipple.

What do people think?

[dick buff]

yeah boobs are just boobs. we all have em, females just have bigger ones. I don't even think tasteful full-frontal nudity would be inappropriate. Not that I'm going to go paste naked women pics in here or anything, but if I drew a naked angel or something or posted one of those anatomical reference studies where the model is nude, i don't think that would constitute "pornography". It's not my forum of course but I'd think a good guideline on nudity would be that the nudity itself was not being used strictly for sexual arousal but for some other purpose (art, reference, etc...).

...except in the case of boobs, since the latest boob pics obviously weren't meant for anything but enjoyment. I could see how a spread legged naked pic could be inappropriate. (well, not so much inappropriate as much as there's no reason for it to be Here, when there's billions of other places to see that sort of thing)

[SuperginraiX]

Cool cool.

Don't mean to be the prude in the room. I like a nice set of boobs as much as the next heterosexual male.

Just figured someone's gotta play devil's advocate. Homer's top score is damn high.

[Doc Jon]

I guess we'll just take it on a case by case basis.

[pedi]

yeah boobs are just boobs. we all have em, females just have bigger ones. I don't even think tasteful full-frontal nudity would be inappropriate. Not that I'm going to go paste naked women pics in here or anything, but if I drew a naked angel or something or posted one of those anatomical reference studies where the model is nude, i don't think that would constitute "pornography". It's not my forum of course but I'd think a good guideline on nudity would be that the nudity itself was not being used strictly for sexual arousal but for some other purpose (art, reference, etc...).

...except in the case of boobs, since the latest boob pics obviously weren't meant for anything but enjoyment. I could see how a spread legged naked pic could be inappropriate. (well, not so much inappropriate as much as there's no reason for it to be Here, when there's billions of other places to see that sort of thing)

Yeah, but by your rational here, if it is a refernece diagramical photograph that is not meant for pornographic pleasures... then it's ok to post it here... whereas, I disagree, because this image right here falls under your strictest rules, but frankly, it's simply not appropriate to post here, Dick... http://www.joeschmidt.com/img/carebears.jpg

;D

[Doc Jon]

Oh good god in heaven! You could have warned me!

I just wasn't prepared to see that at this moment.

"It's so angry!"

[pedi]

Oh good god in heaven! You could have warned me!

I just wasn't prepared to see that at this moment.

"It's so angry!"

Well, that's exactly what I'm saying... that's TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE! How dare Dick make such a suggestion!

[Doc Jon]

So angry...

[pedi]

Why do you call God's holy creation of perpetual life, "angry"???

Would u prefer I remove the link? I'm not looking to sink the boat... just rock it a bit.

[pedi]

Fine.... I changed the link to something more your speed