Saturday, September 24, 2016 • Afternoon Edition • "The comic book industry's inflamed butthole."

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!

Advertisement

NSA Only Uses Spytech to Stalk Lovers Once a Year or So

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:31 pm

http://gizmodo.com/surprise-nsa-agents-use-all-seeing-power-to-spy-on-the-1193464964

Constitutional!
User avatar

Thunderstorm

Not a Kardashian

Postby Thunderstorm » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:33 pm

Perfectly acceptable.
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:35 pm

If those are mostly self-reported, then it is probably 10x that or more.
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:36 pm

Hey, if you had a problem with the NSA using surviellance of all communications of everybody in the entire world to spy on their spouse, then you should have spoke up about it when Bush was in office.
User avatar

dairydead

Humuhumunukunukuapuaa

Postby dairydead » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:37 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:Hey, if you had a problem with the NSA using surviellance of all communications of everybody in the entire world to spy on their spouse, then you should have spoke up about it when Bush was in office.


you forgot

"Hab"
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:37 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:Hey, if you had a problem with the NSA using surviellance of all communications of everybody in the entire world to spy on their spouse, then you should have spoke up about it when Bush was in office.


I spoke up about it way before that. :-(
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:38 pm

Victorian Squid wrote:
I spoke up about it way before that. :-(


You had your chance Squid. Fall in line.
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:41 pm

[crushed beneath the wheel]

:smt095
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:46 pm

...no love for a Hermann Hesse joke? :|
User avatar

Lord Simian

The Lord of the Monkeys

Postby Lord Simian » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:10 pm

Victorian Squid wrote:...no love for a Hermann Hesse joke? :|


Image

:smt102
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:16 pm

Thank you, Lord Plebian. :smt012
User avatar

Spektre

penile prisoner

Postby Spektre » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:17 pm



Yep, completely legal until the SUPREME COURT chimes in. And then of course the next time is too, until they chime in again, and the next, and the next.

Things are intrinsically unconstitutional.
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:21 pm

That sort of 20th C thinking was just an anomaly in history, according to the PTB.

In fact, the whole concept of privacy is crazily old-fashioned when you think about it. Will be the culturally indoctrinated way of thinking, already is to a large degree.
User avatar

IvCNuB4

Staff Writer

Postby IvCNuB4 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Wow. What's next ? Police Officers abusing their power and databases to check up on spouses and significant others ? :P
User avatar

Frag

REAL OFFICIAL President of the Outhouse

Postby Frag » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:36 pm

Come on, Jude. You are better than this. This is totally the type of distraction that minimizes your argument.

This is: "People do something petty and are punished for it." Do you really think Feinstein would be so willing to comment if it was something important?

Think about it. Once a year, some schmo that works on the NSA checks his/her's significant others e-mail/text messages/whatever while at work, gets caught and reprimanded. And of course, they didn't use the "NSA’s domestic surveillance infrastructure."

So what did we find out? People at the NSA are humans just like the rest of us, the NSA catches even the smallest infractions and this "smoking gun" shows nothing illegal.

Good job. Your trolling thread (which this totally was despite any denials forthcoming) minimizes your overall argument.

leave a comment with facebook


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Earth-2 NoctourneM, GLX, Google [Bot], Grayson, HNutz, Liam Moorhart, Sarahroo, sdsichero, Yahoo [Bot] and 36 guests