Monday, May 30, 2016 • Afternoon Edition • "Still Kardashian free!"

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!


So I'm reading Watchmen for the 5th or 6th time

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

User avatar

AaronW

Rain Partier

Postby AaronW » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:41 pm

The Watchmen and V for Vendetta are my two favorite comic works. While V for Vendetta was horrid, I have my hopes up for Watchmen since the Director said he was carrying it around using it as a storyboard for the movie. I know shit will be cut, but not a butchering to make it "relevent" as the Wachowski siblings tried to do with the trainwreck that was V.
User avatar

chap22

Rain Partier

Postby chap22 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:51 pm

CountD wrote:yeahhhhh...Watchmen is good, but it's NO WE3


insert obligatory "We3 was 1000 times better the first time i read it, when it was called The Incredible Journey" comment.
User avatar

Allen

Staff Writer

Postby Allen » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:03 pm

chap22 wrote:what she said. meh.

V for Vendetta however...that's the shit.


I have to agree with both Carrie and Chappie (Oh God. Someone shoot me now!).

I thought it is very, very overrated. It's good, but nothing even remotely resembling a masterpiece. And I thought V was better than Watchmen.
User avatar

chap22

Rain Partier

Postby chap22 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Allen wrote:I have to agree with both Carrie and Chappie (Oh God. Someone shoot me now!).

I thought it is very, very overrated. It's good, but nothing even remotely resembling a masterpiece. And I thought V was better than Watchmen.


well, let me clarify my position...technically speaking, it is indeed a masterpiece of comic storytelling, and probably is the single most finely-crafted superhero story ever written.

that said, reading it, to me personally, is like reading a clinical text on how to watch paint dry. i can not get any emotional investment one way or the other with Watchmen, with any of its chracters, with any of its themes, with any of its action. it bores me. i can recognize the craft inherent in Watchmen, but just don't care about the story. it's sort of a form/function type thing for me.
User avatar

Allen

Staff Writer

Postby Allen » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:10 pm

chap22 wrote:
that said, reading it, to me personally, is like reading a clinical text on how to watch paint dry. i can not get any emotional investment one way or the other with Watchmen, with any of its chracters, with any of its themes, with any of its action. it bores me. i can recognize the craft inherent in Watchmen, but just don't care about the story. it's sort of a form/function type thing for me.


But, that, to me, is what I dislike about it. It was trying too hard to be great. A truly great, classic work has to be entertaining and artful at the same time. I need to be caught up in what is happening. If I am actively dissecting a literary work the first time I pick it up, then it hasn't done its job, IMO. That was what Watchmen did to me.
User avatar

Chris

Rain Partier

Postby Chris » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:12 pm

I love this book. It's one of the rare occassions where I genuinely can't understand how anyone would not be able to like it.. it's perfect in every way. Grant Morrison really out-did himself with this one.
User avatar

Keb

<( ' . ' )>

Postby Keb » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:16 pm

Are all the people saying Grant Morrison wrote Watchmen doing it as a joke?

It's probably one of the finest pieces of literature on my shelf. And I have lots of fine literature on my shelf. ;)

Then again, I like everything Alan Moore writes, or has a hand in, except for Terra Obscura, because that shit sucked.
User avatar

kingofcities

dINGO

Postby kingofcities » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:17 pm

Carrie wrote:I wouldn't know. I didn't read it. I don't like Moore's writing as a rule.


Neither do I for the most part. There are some notable exceptions but on the whole I think he's well overrated.
User avatar

superfictious

Humuhumunukunukuapuaa

Postby superfictious » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:25 pm

Keb wrote:Are all the people saying Grant Morrison wrote Watchmen doing it as a joke?



No.
User avatar

Keb

<( ' . ' )>

Postby Keb » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:59 pm

Black_Kryptonian wrote:No.
Explain?
User avatar

superfictious

Humuhumunukunukuapuaa

Postby superfictious » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:02 pm

Keb wrote:Explain?


Because Morrison is so awesome and in tune with the universe's heaving, milky bosom that he's mastered the art of retroactive authorship.









Yeah, it's an old Rama joke that'll probably live forever.
User avatar

Keb

<( ' . ' )>

Postby Keb » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:04 pm

Yeah see I didn't post there for like two years so I'm a little out of the loop on this one.
User avatar

Woody

Motherfucker from Hell

Postby Woody » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:05 pm

chap22 wrote:well, let me clarify my position...technically speaking, it is indeed a masterpiece of comic storytelling, and probably is the single most finely-crafted superhero story ever written.

that said, reading it, to me personally, is like reading a clinical text on how to watch paint dry. i can not get any emotional investment one way or the other with Watchmen, with any of its chracters, with any of its themes, with any of its action. it bores me. i can recognize the craft inherent in Watchmen, but just don't care about the story. it's sort of a form/function type thing for me.
Once again- that's the way I felt about it until this most recent reading
User avatar

Woody

Motherfucker from Hell

Postby Woody » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:07 pm

Keb wrote:Yeah see I didn't post there for like two years so I'm a little out of the loop on this one.
It's a joke that ground into the dirt over there and people are still trying to pass it off as funny.

It was funny the first time 2 years ago guys- now, not so much
User avatar

Keb

<( ' . ' )>

Postby Keb » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:07 pm

Woody wrote:Once again- that's the way I felt about it until this most recent reading
:-D

The first time I read it I was like "okay so what", the second time, I actually went through it, took my time, read all the supplimentary material, enjoyed the construction and all that shit, well I loved it. The third time I actually bought it (until then I was reading the library's copy) and every time I read it now it still gets better.

Around the fifth time, I realized John Osterman walks around without any pants.

leave a comment with facebook


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DarthEwok, GiveWarAChance, Glacier16, Google [Bot], Ward Fowler and 35 guests