Saturday, December 3, 2016 • Evening Edition • "For when life fails you."

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!

Advertisement

Sharron Angle: Muslim law taking hold in parts of US

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

User avatar

Thunderstorm

Not a Kardashian

Postby Thunderstorm » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:01 am

Frag It wrote:
Totally shocked that it was immediately fixed.
:roll:



It came up, and that's a problem. Like I said, if this happened in an area that was all-Muslim or close to it, I could see how it would be much more acceptable. I could see people like you and Mr. Black arguing for it and calling anyone who's against it intolerant.
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:02 am

But people like Frag It are so racked with white guilt that they make excuses for this kind of brutality and intolerance and chalk it up to paranoid white people. Muslims get a free pass for just about anything because of liberal guilt, instead of looking at it and saying "Most muslims are probably good, decent, normal people, but this sharia law is pretty fucking bad," liberals are afraid to criticize anyone non-white, it's an extreme just as ridiculous as a FEL post about how all muslims are evil.
User avatar

Thunderstorm

Not a Kardashian

Postby Thunderstorm » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:04 am

Jude Terror wrote:But people like Frag It are so racked with white guilt that they make excuses for this kind of brutality and intolerance and chalk it up to paranoid white people. Muslims get a free pass for just about anything because of liberal guilt.


Unless it's a Muslim (Arab) woman. Color trumps gender in the Liberal brain.
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:05 am

Thunderstorm wrote:
Unless it's a Muslim (Arab) woman. Color trumps gender in the Liberal brain.


Well, those women are all cunts, obviously. Liberalism is a misogynistic philosophy.
User avatar

MoneyMelon

Chief Yankee Wanker

Postby MoneyMelon » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:07 am

Frag It wrote:
Totally shocked that it was immediately fixed.
:roll:

You don't find it unsettling that this was the ruling in the first place?
User avatar

Frag

REAL OFFICIAL President of the Outhouse

Postby Frag » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:08 am

Thunderstorm wrote:
It came up, and that's a problem. Like I said, if this happened in an area that was all-Muslim or close to it, I could see how it would be much more acceptable. I could see people like you and Mr. Black arguing for it and calling anyone who's against it intolerant.


It came up and was shot down. One isolated incident proves your point?
User avatar

Frag

REAL OFFICIAL President of the Outhouse

Postby Frag » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:08 am

MoneyMelon wrote:You don't find it unsettling that this was the ruling in the first place?


I don't. I chalk it up to a moron judge.
User avatar

Regulator

Motherfucker from Hell

Postby Regulator » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:10 am

MoneyMelon wrote:You don't find it unsettling that this was the ruling in the first place?


Read what I wrote. The judge is ruling on the restraining order and only the restraining order. In acknowledging that the man was using religious beliefs to fuck his wife whenever he wanted, even if she didn't want to, he's also acknowledging that those beliefs don't hold for a woman you're not married to. Thus, in his mind, there is no need for a restraining order.

Later on in the article, it says the man was indicted on criminal charges.
User avatar

Thunderstorm

Not a Kardashian

Postby Thunderstorm » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:10 am

Jude Terror wrote:
Well, those women are all cunts, obviously. Liberalism is a misogynistic philosophy.


One day you'll come around and see that the only evils in the world are White people, Western Countries, and Christianity. Every other race, country and religion is always perfect and full of pure goodness and has never, in their entire history, done one thing wrong.
User avatar

MoneyMelon

Chief Yankee Wanker

Postby MoneyMelon » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:10 am

Frag It wrote:
I don't. I chalk it up to a moron judge.


Moron judges terrify me.

I mean, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are people, when it comes to campaign contributions.

I don't have much confidence in them.
User avatar

Frag

REAL OFFICIAL President of the Outhouse

Postby Frag » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:10 am

Jude Terror wrote:But people like Frag It are so racked with white guilt that they make excuses for this kind of brutality and intolerance and chalk it up to paranoid white people. Muslims get a free pass for just about anything because of liberal guilt, instead of looking at it and saying "Most muslims are probably good, decent, normal people, but this sharia law is pretty fucking bad," liberals are afraid to criticize anyone non-white, it's an extreme just as ridiculous as a FEL post about how all muslims are evil.


What are you talking about?

They don't get a free pass. This guy went to jail eventually IIRC. One judge did something stupid. I don't see what the problem is.

And yes, I agree: "Most muslims are probably good, decent, normal people, but this sharia law is pretty fucking bad." It doesn't mean that it's taking over U.S. cities. That is the definition of paranoia. :lol:
User avatar

Frag

REAL OFFICIAL President of the Outhouse

Postby Frag » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:11 am

Regulator wrote:
Read what I wrote. The judge is ruling on the restraining order and only the restraining order. In acknowledging that the man was using religious beliefs to fuck his wife whenever he wanted, even if she didn't want to, he's also acknowledging that those beliefs don't hold for a woman you're not married to. Thus, in his mind, there is no need for a restraining order.

Later on in the article, it says the man was indicted on criminal charges.


You obviously hate white people.

/ThunderJude'd
User avatar

Regulator

Motherfucker from Hell

Postby Regulator » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:13 am

Frag It wrote:
You obviously hate white people.

/ThunderJude'd


I'm a defector. :oops:
User avatar

MoneyMelon

Chief Yankee Wanker

Postby MoneyMelon » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:14 am

Regulator wrote:
Read what I wrote. The judge is ruling on the restraining order and only the restraining order. In acknowledging that the man was using religious beliefs to fuck his wife whenever he wanted, even if she didn't want to, he's also acknowledging that those beliefs don't hold for a woman you're not married to. Thus, in his mind, there is no need for a restraining order.

Later on in the article, it says the man was indicted on criminal charges.

Religious beliefs should be irrelevant to the ruling as the appellate court stated

Charles' ruling was overturned last month by New Jersey's Appellate Court, which ruled that the husband's religious beliefs were irrelevant and that the judge, in taking them into consideration, "was mistaken."
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:14 am

Frag It wrote:
What are you talking about?

They don't get a free pass. This guy went to jail eventually IIRC. One judge did something stupid. I don't see what the problem is.

And yes, I agree: "Most muslims are probably good, decent, normal people, but this sharia law is pretty fucking bad." It doesn't mean that it's taking over U.S. cities. That is the definition of paranoia. :lol:


It's already happened in Britain.

leave a comment with facebook


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Grayson, Liam Moorhart, T.S.S.-72 and 31 guests

cron