Juan Cena wrote:
Which is annoying, as a decent title ruin would be mutually beneficial for both Lesnar and the WWE.
What POSSIBLE benefit would there be in putting a title on Lesnar?
Lesnar has achieved that level where he doesn't NEED them, it's unnecessary. Like putting a belt on The Rock, or Steve Austin if he came back. A title is used to build someone, and to add credibility to them. I don't need to see a belt on Steve Austin's waist if he comes back to know he can be a threat to John Cena, because he's STEVE FUCKING AUSTIN.
Same logic. Brock doesn't need a title to be a threat, because he's BROCK FUCKING LESNAR.
And Brock/Cena has been done. Waste of time to repeat it.