S.F. Jude Terror wrote:The question is, what are you talking about? Who is arguing that the people that committed this crime are innocent? Seems like an open and shut case to me, which is probably why no one is talking about it. If you're complaining that the media race baits, I agree with you, but I think your reaction is the one they're looking to elicit (from people like you), and of course they want a different kind of outrage from liberals, but to the same end. Outrage = ratings. White people being mad at black people and black people being mad at white people and white people who are mad at black people being mad at other white people who are not mad at black people is precisely what the PTB want to be happening, because then you're all not paying attention to the fact that armed flying robots have the legal right to kill American citizens and the government keeps a database of every phone call you've ever made.
I mean, what is it that YOU think is the motivation for the way the media treats this stuff. Just to stick it to whitey? Why? They ARE whitey.
I'm not raging about blacks. I am not stupid and completely agree with you that the media race baits. The problem I have is that it's only ever in one direction. If they wanted to, this case would be a perfect way to race bait in the other direction. Why is it that it's a hate crime when a "white latino" kills a black yute, but not when 3 black yutes kill a white yute? The media isn't looking to elicit a response from me if they aren't even reporting the story. Well, maybe they are....if their plan is to enrage me by calling white on black crime "hate crime", but not calling black on white crime "hate crime".
I beleive the media simply wants ratings and reports the news in such a way to get the highest ratings. So, why is it then that black on white crime isn't ratings worthy, but white on black crime is? Why do people fall for such an obvious double standard? Why did everyone here go out of their minds arguing about Trayvon when it's clear that the media manipulated the entire story from the get go, but no one bats an eye or feels that Chris Lane is worthy of any discussion?