The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

by **BlueStreak** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:44 pm

Benderbrau wrote:I know you guys think of this as a "book" forum and all and want to give people titles that relate to positions in the literary world like "writer" and "editor", etc but this is an internet forum and what you just described sounds like the work of an sys admin to me and speaking as an IT professional I know I'm right. So IMHO you might want to redefine staff roles more clearly to better suit their responsiblities to avoid confusion in the future I guess is what I'm saying. Call an apple an apple, know what I mean?

Per the IT Professional's professional advice that he knows to be right, I have updated the staff titles to better reflect their roles on the site.

I hope this clears up any confusion the IT Professional might have about this totally serious and professional forum that's in need of his professional opinion that he knows to be right.

by **Cat-Scratch** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:46 pm

Benderbrau wrote:I wish you'd have the same reaction to most of the topics you think to make threads about before you make them.

But then you and other would not be entertained by taking me to task for them. :-D

by **nietoperz** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:48 pm

BlueMole wrote:
Per the IT Professional's professional advice that he knows to be right, I have updated the staff titles to better reflect their roles on the site.

I hope this clears up any confusion the IT Professional might have about this totally serious and professional forum that's in need of his professional opinion that he knows to be right.

Well, I for one think it's fantastic that we have an IT Professional on hand to offer his professional opinion in such a timely and helpful manner. I daresay that without his serious and professional input we would all be completely at a loss to explain important IT functions of our own forum.

by **sdsichero** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:49 pm

Benderbrau wrote:According to the guidelines thread:

Not questioning his reasoning just thinking that locking threads was a feature we the posters have been asking for for quite some time now but were told we couldn't have it because we couldn't be trusted with it. And yet here's BK who's listed only as an editor and therefore is under no obligation to avoid drama then any of the rest of us having the ability to use it.

Who?

by **sdsichero** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:50 pm

nietoperz wrote:
Well, I for one think it's fantastic that we have an IT Professional on hand to offer his professional opinion in such a timely and helpful manner. I daresay that without his serious and professional input we would all be completely at a loss to explain important IT functions of our own forum.

Every IT operation operates in the exact same manner.

Fact.

by **BlueStreak** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:51 pm

nietoperz wrote:
Well, I for one think it's fantastic that we have an IT Professional on hand to offer his professional opinion in such a timely and helpful manner. I daresay that without his serious and professional input we would all be completely at a loss to explain important IT functions of our own forum.

I agree. Thanks to his call for correct titles, I have amended yours to Lord Swedish Mugwump of the forum.

Simian is now the Frothy MacGuffin, MrBlack is now the Orator of the RiverDance, and Jude is now Site Generalist.

by **Lord Simian** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:53 pm

BlueMole wrote:
I agree. Thanks to his call for correct titles, I have amended yours to Lord Swedish Mugwump of the forum.

Simian is now the Frothy MacGuffin, MrBlack is now the Orator of the RiverDance, and Jude is now Site Generalist.

Cool. I had a few beers last night at a bar called MacGuffin's.

by **nietoperz** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:54 pm

BlueMole wrote:
I agree. Thanks to his call for correct titles, I have amended yours to Lord Swedish Mugwump of the forum.

Simian is now the Frothy MacGuffin, MrBlack is now the Orator of the RiverDance, and Jude is now Site Generalist.

Wise decisions all. And what of BK? One would think his would be the title that would most need clarifying, as per IT Professional's serious and professional specifications.

by **BlueStreak** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:55 pm

Remember, only Mugwumps can use disciplinary actions.

by **Benderbrau** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:56 pm

BlueMole wrote:
I agree. Thanks to his call for correct titles, I have amended yours to Lord Swedish Mugwump of the forum.

Simian is now the Frothy MacGuffin, MrBlack is now the Orator of the RiverDance, and Jude is now Site Generalist.

Please also include "resident fatty" in Jude's title. I will not have his wondrous contributions to obesity jokes here be overlooked by you or anyone

by **sdsichero** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:56 pm

nietoperz wrote:
Wise decisions all. And what of BK? One would think his would be the title that would most need clarifying, as per IT Professional's serious and professional specifications.

Again, who?

by **BlueStreak** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:56 pm

nietoperz wrote:
Wise decisions all. And what of BK? One would think his would be the title that would most need clarifying, as per IT Professional's serious and professional specifications.

Flagbearer of Tarmichaelhawk fits his duties quite well, I think.

by **nietoperz** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:57 pm

BlueMole wrote:Remember, only Mugwumps can use disciplinary actions.

And those are meted out using bug powder dust.

by **TheLurker** » Fri May 04, 2012 5:59 pm

I thought Simian said anyone could be a mawd. They just had to come to his house for a month and change diapers. Personally, I don's want the job.

by **Benderbrau** » Fri May 04, 2012 6:02 pm

TheLurker wrote:I thought Simian said anyone could be a mawd. They just had to come to his house for a month and change diapers. Personally, I don's want the job.

Wise decision because remmber he's a monkey living in society so he means change his diapers. :shock: