nietoperz wrote:Please could you dial it back a little. I know you're kidding but this was pretty harsh.
For clarity's sake I was hoping you could identify exactly which part of my post you found so harsh. I need you to spell it out for me so I don't make the same mistake again.
Nightly wrote:No offense, bro... but are you kidding? I woulda thunk you'd eat up a militaristic, arms dealing fascist's book.
Was it my calling Iron Man a "militaristic fascist" that was out of bounds?
Was it my implication that Rob would be sympathetic/enthusiastic to that viewpoint? Was that overly harsh?
Assuming for a moment that I directly namecalled Rob a "militaristic fascist", which I quite literally didn't, would that be out of bounds?
If so, does that also mean he could never -in turn- call me a 'pacifistic socialist'?
What other viewpoints are considered purgoratives? Is implying someone is a humanist, or environmentalist equally harsh? I imagine it could be to some folk.
Anyway, please specify as elaborately as possible on what part of my post was nearing, if not over, the line.