[ Facebook comments]
Discuss the latest comic book news, read previews and reviews of upcoming and recent comic books, talk about comics, vote on your favorites, and more!
-
ReturnoftheMack

- REAL OFFICIAL President of the Outhouse
-
- Posts: 34183
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:25 pm
- Title: Mama don't like tattletales.
- Formerly: Frag It, Rusty Kuntz
by ReturnoftheMack » Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:34 pm
Guys, Ntkrst is right. Seal team 6 confirmed that Nitro didn't cause Civil War. Captain America refused to charge him. Why? Because we all know that we shouldn't take Cap at his word.
So you would benefit from this guy getting the blame?

Who was Cap protecting?
The true villain of Civil War and AvX, revealed!
Jude Terror wrote:I'll vote for NPWFBH in the next election.
Outhouse Post #1,000,000:
Frag It wrote::smt117

Advertisement
-
Rockman

- YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
-
- Posts: 24597
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:25 pm
- Formerly: AMS
by Rockman » Mon Jul 09, 2012 5:38 pm
Ntikrst wrote:At least I'm not an ignorant tool who would be so fucking stupid that they would take Dubya and Cheney at their word and ignore the fact that the FBI refused to charge Bin Laden with the 9/11 attacks.
So why didn't the FBI charge Bin Laden with 9/11? Not enough evidence. But there was no discussion of innocence or guilt because Dubya "knew" he was guilty. Just like he "knew" Iraq had yellow cake uranium to amass their WMD stockpile....
Well, I will comment on your blind allegiance to the Bush administration and the corporate owned media who repeat the lie loud enough often enough. Wake the fuck up!
As far as Transonic goes, I guess Namor cared enough. At least he cares in principle, or maybe Namor just wants to destroy his enemies and Transonic's abduction is the rationalization he's been looking for. Too bad the Avengers were arrogant enough to provide him with one, now Wakanda has to pay the price.
You suck so much.
-
Rockman

- YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
-
- Posts: 24597
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:25 pm
- Formerly: AMS
by Rockman » Mon Jul 09, 2012 5:45 pm
For the record the FBI would not charge anyone unless they had them in custody.
-
spidertour02

- rubber spoon
-
- Posts: 6081
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:40 pm
- Location: New York City
- Title: Engineering The Future
-
by spidertour02 » Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:31 pm
Ntikrst wrote:At least I'm not an ignorant tool who would be so fucking stupid that they would take Dubya and Cheney at their word and ignore the fact that the FBI refused to charge Bin Laden with the 9/11 attacks.
So why didn't the FBI charge Bin Laden with 9/11? Not enough evidence. But there was no discussion of innocence or guilt because Dubya "knew" he was guilty. Just like he "knew" Iraq had yellow cake uranium to amass their WMD stockpile....
You're right. It's not like Bin Laden, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and others
definitively claimed responsibility for the attacks (in the case of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, more than once) or anything.
Ignored.
leave a comment with facebook
Return to The News Stand
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: FaceBook [Linkcheck], pat, Punchy and 26 guests