Thursday, June 30, 2016 • Morning Edition • "Those who arrive survive. Maybe."

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!

Advertisement

DC Bound and Determined to Kill Any and All Momentum for Superman/Wonder Woman Series

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

User avatar

LOLtron

Rain Partier

Postby LOLtron » Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:59 am

DC Bound and Determined to Kill Any and All Momentum for Superman/Wonder Woman Series

Comments made during the Toronto Fan Expo have unleashed another wave of preemptive fan rage.



Source: The Mary Sue

Superman/Wonder Woman is the upcoming DC series that's already being bombarded by negative press across the Internet.  We here at the Outhouse are refusing to take a stance on the series, mainly because it's written by Charles Soule, who may or may not be the greatest thing since sliced bread.  However, we have commented on how cringeworthy the marketing for this book has been, and last weekend was no exception.

Last weekend, at Toronto's Fan Expo, DC held an All Access panel discussing their slate of upcoming series.  Tony Daniel, artist for the series, and Brian Cunningham, DC's VP of Marketing, were among the panelists and briefly discussed the book.  Here's Daniel's thoughts on the book (bold emphasis ours):

It’s funny, because in Chicago I was talking to Bobbie Chase and Bob Harras about making a book, I wasn’t referring to creating this book, but I mentioned maybe, can we create a book that targets a little bit more of the female readership that’s been growing. And maybe a book that has a little bit of romance in it, a little big of sex appeal, you know, something that would, for lack of a better example, that hits on the Twilight audience.

You know, millions of people went to see those in the theaters because it has those kind of, you know, subject matter. The drama, the characterization with love triangles and forbidden love and things like that. Literally a month later they asked me, “Hey, what do you think of Superman/Wonder Woman?” And I think it took all of maybe three seconds for me to say, “Yeah, that’s great. Let’s do that.” Because that’s exactly what I was describing that we need.

So the big takeaways there: Daniel thinks DC needs more books that skews towards the female crowd (good!) and the way to do that is by making a book that harkens back to sparkly vampires and dysfunctional romance (bad!). 

We're not going to knock on Twilight here (although feel free to do so in the comments), but it seems a little...cliche? one-dimensional? that DC feels the only way to get women to read their books is to make it like a young adult romance novel that's been heavily criticized for the way it portrays its female protagonist .

We weren't the only ones whose red flags were raised by that statement.  Liz, a contributor at io9, had this exchange with the panel during the Q&A session:

Liz: When you were talking about Superman/Wonder Woman, what caught my ear was, you’re making it romance and romantic to catch the women. My question is, that’s not all you’re doing, right? [Laughter and applause from the audience]

Daniel: Are you asking if you’ll see like, Superman butt shots? I’ll be sure to keep it even.

What? Let's hear that one again, this time in slow motion:

Daniel: Are you asking if you’ll see like, Superman butt shots? I’ll be sure to keep it even even even even ....

Daniel has a history of seeing if he can fit all the feet into his mouth, so I suppose I can't be too surprised about that comment.  And I think that it was intended as a joke, just one that fell flat. 

What's worrying about this whole exchange is that DC seems to think that the only way to get female readers is to make comics that focus on romance.  And that the best way to make a romance comic is to ape Twilight.  And frankly, I don't know if that's something female readers are interested in. 

On the plus side, Daniel said this about the series as well:

You’re going to be really surprised. I mean, that’s if, you know, that’s what you’re not expecting to be blown away or something, I think you will be blown away. [Wonder Woman]’s very strongly written, she’s not, you know, I mean she holds her own. And you’re going to like the interaction between Superman and Wonder Woman and as well as their private lives, Diana and Clark. I mean, we have a lot of fun with their interactions and we’re going to have that drama.

And on different levels, there’s a lot of layers to it that make it, you know, a little bit more of a more enjoyable book for me to draw and I’m sure for Charles [Soule]. We’re both doing something kind of new with this so it has a perfect recipe I think and it’s something I really want to do. I really think you’re going to like it a lot. Let me know. Just get on Facebook, let me know.

Why couldn't he just say that in the first place?

We're going to do our best to give this comic a shot.  And we're already lining up a cross-section of female readers to see if Superman/Wonder Woman has any appeal to the demographic DC is (allegedly) trying to reach. However, we're to the point where DC just needs to STFU and let the book speak for itself, rather than keep building negative press before two months before the book launches. 



Written or Contributed by ThanosCopter


READ THIS ARTICLE ON THE FRONT PAGE, HUMANS!
User avatar

Randy Meyer

FACEBOOKTron

Postby Randy Meyer » Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:17 am

Yeah, I was actually willing to try this book until reading all the Twilight crap from Cunningham here. Now, I'm not so sure.
User avatar

Jim Martin

FACEBOOKTron

Postby Jim Martin » Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:29 am

The only thing and I mean the only thing that is making me try issue #1 is Charles Soule as the writer. My big fear is DC will f*ck up the Azzarello WW series. I mean can we just say that series is on Earth 18 or something and have that book never reference the god awful new DCU.
User avatar

LoganRSA

penile prisoner

Postby LoganRSA » Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:44 am

That can't be right. The Twilight audience isn't 45 years old.

elwang

Faster Pussycat

Postby elwang » Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:48 am

[Wonder Woman]’s very strongly written, she’s not, you know, I mean she holds her own.


In other words, she's a monosyllabic rage beast, like in Justice League, not the thoughtful, compassionate individual found in her own title.
User avatar

Lord Simian

The Lord of the Monkeys

Postby Lord Simian » Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:52 am

elwang wrote:
In other words, she's a monosyllabic rage beast, like in Justice League, not the thoughtful, compassionate individual found in her own title.


I have no ability to understand the leap of "logic" you just made there.

elwang

Faster Pussycat

Postby elwang » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:01 am

Lord Simian wrote:
I have no ability to understand the leap of "logic" you just made there.


He talks about her being "strongly" written, and then immediately jumps to "hold her own," a phrase rooted in combat. Wonder Woman's strength as a character isn't just her fighting ability, it's that she knows when to fight, and when not to. Azzarello has proven he understands this. Most other folks currently working at DC have not, hence the massive discrepancies in her portrayal between her book, and every other book in the New 52.
User avatar

SporkBot

Motherfucker from Hell

Postby SporkBot » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:22 am

Uuughh.

"We need more female readership."
"Let's make a book about Superman and Wonder Woman."
"Brilliant! But how do we market it to women?"
"Women like Twilight. We could compare to Twilight."
"Brilliant!"
"Wait...maybe I was wrong. Is it going to be anything like Twilight--?"
"Shut up! Run with it! TWILIGHT!"

Meh. They did the same thing with Superman: Earth One (a book absolutely NOTHING like sparkly vampires).

Twilight comparison or no, I don't know if I'm going to pick up this book. Frankly, it might've been a better idea if they hadn't paired these two up romantically. I believe that's what they call irony.
User avatar

Lord Simian

The Lord of the Monkeys

Postby Lord Simian » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:31 am

elwang wrote:
He talks about her being "strongly" written, and then immediately jumps to "hold her own," a phrase rooted in combat. Wonder Woman's strength as a character isn't just her fighting ability, it's that she knows when to fight, and when not to. Azzarello has proven he understands this. Most other folks currently working at DC have not, hence the massive discrepancies in her portrayal between her book, and every other book in the New 52.


I see. Strongly written is a common writing term though, not reliant on physicality. Not is the phrase "hold her own" exclusively about combat. I don't have high hopes for this book either, but I think you're reading meanings into his words that aren't really there...
User avatar

Jim Martin

FACEBOOKTron

Postby Jim Martin » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:33 am

Katy Schwendeman Hess I'll send it to you with Conan books - did you get the others I sent?

elwang

Faster Pussycat

Postby elwang » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:37 am

Lord Simian wrote:
I see. Strongly written is a common writing term though, not reliant on physicality. Not is the phrase "hold her own" exclusively about combat. I don't have high hopes for this book either, but I think you're reading meanings into his words that aren't really there...


I'm aware of that, but I'm also considering the source--i.e., Tony Daniel.

The Helliot

Fish-Smackin' Knight

Postby The Helliot » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:44 am

He talks about her being "strongly" written, and then immediately jumps to "hold her own," a phrase rooted in combat. Wonder Woman's strength as a character isn't just her fighting ability, it's that she knows when to fight, and when not to. Azzarello has proven he understands this. Most other folks currently working at DC have not, hence the massive discrepancies in her portrayal between her book, and every other book in the New 52.


:smt038
User avatar

IvCNuB4

Staff Writer

Postby IvCNuB4 » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:55 am

Comics nerds, Twilight nerds, Bronies. We're what gives these franchises momentum :lol:
If they want to tap into the "Twilight-ish" female sci-fi romance demographic I say go for it while the going is still good.

Eddie Berganza, DC editor, agreed it’s an awesome team-up. “Like Tony was saying, we don’t explore romance enough in our regular titles,” Berganza said. “Here we have two of our most epic icons and what Tony is doing with the pages is just amazing.”

Berganza also hinted that there’s a villain on the cover of "Superman/Wonder Woman" #1 that’s going to play a big part in the series. “We have not seen him yet in the New 52, and so the whole thing is going to be really huge,” Berganza said.
User avatar

Zechs

Outhouse Editor

Postby Zechs » Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:17 am

Great Superman is going to fucking sparkle!!! :smt013
User avatar

Kalisto

underclassman

Postby Kalisto » Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:33 am

I miss the times when Wonder Woman and Batman were a thing. *sigh*

leave a comment with facebook


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GymnerdNL, MikeinLA and 59 guests