Sunday, May 29, 2016 • Morning Edition • "The number two comic book website."

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!


Brian Wood Responds to Tess Fowler's Accusations

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

User avatar

LOLtron

Rain Partier

Postby LOLtron » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:26 pm

Brian Wood Responds to Tess Fowler's Accusations

In a statement on his website, Brian Wood has responded to the controversy that has been building for the last several weeks.



Source: BrianWood.com

Earlier this week, we reported on a series of Tweets from cartoonist Tess Fowler about Brian Wood. You can read that story here.

Wood has issued the following response on his website:

For the last couple weeks I’ve been accused of a lot of very serious things. I feel I have to speak up for myself and for my friends and colleagues who are finding themselves under a sort of scrutiny they don’t deserve. This situation has reached the point where it is affecting people who in no way deserve it, up to and including my family.

Tess Fowler is correct about this: I did make a pass at her at SDCC Hyatt bar roughly 8 years ago. But when she declined, that was the conclusion of the matter for me. There was never a promise of quid pro quo, no exertion of power, no threats, and no revenge. This was at a time in my career when I had very little professional power or industry recognition. The pickup was a lame move, absolutely, and I’ll accept the heat for having done it, but that’s all it was: I liked her, I took a chance, and was shot down. I immediately regretted it, and I apologize to Ms. Fowler for the tackiness and embarrassment of it all.

I’ve kept quiet for these last couple weeks because this is a problematic thing to address without unintended blowback. I didn’t want to appear as if I was simply calling Ms. Fowler a liar, or invite any negative opinion directed back at her. While I believe she is as incorrect as she can be about what my intent and motivations were, there’s no way for this not to devolve into an ugly he-said-she-said situation, amplified to the nth degree by the nature of the internet.

I think the larger issues of abuse in the comics industry are genuine and I share everyone's concerns. As a father to a young daughter showing an interest in making her own comics, I do really care about this stuff. So I don’t want our difference of accounts to take attention away from that industry-wide discussion that needs to happen.

Brian Wood
11/15/2013

 

As with Fowler's statements, we can in no way vouch for the veracity of anything being said, but at least we now have two sides to the story. We'll keep you updated.



Written or Contributed by Jude Terror


READ THIS ARTICLE ON THE FRONT PAGE, HUMANS!
User avatar

Rockman

Rain Partier

Postby Rockman » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:32 pm

much ado about nothing eh.

Sound reasonable and rational to me.

Good job Mr. Wood you look like the better person here.
User avatar

xaraan

Staff Writer

Postby xaraan » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:39 pm

Good statement.
User avatar

Regulator

Motherfucker from Hell

Postby Regulator » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:48 pm

Rockman wrote:much ado about nothing eh.

Sound reasonable and rational to me.

Good job Mr. Wood you look like the better person here.


What makes his version the unquestioned truth and hers a lie or exaggeration? The tone? Don't you feel the least bit transparent?
User avatar

IvCNuB4

Staff Writer

Postby IvCNuB4 » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:53 pm

We don't know what's the truth yet. But the fact is Wood comes off as rational, calm and factual.
She came off like a hysterical loon on crack.

He was smart for waiting to respond. By letting her run her mouth she did all his his work for him :lol:

poop

Postby poop » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:53 pm

It doesn't. It just presented in a calm proffesional manner. Sadly, for alot people, that's taken better than caps locked ranting profanity.
User avatar

Regulator

Motherfucker from Hell

Postby Regulator » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:56 pm

alijafferythehunk wrote:It doesn't. It just presented in a calm proffesional manner. Sadly, for alot people, that's taken better than caps locked ranting profanity.


If you actually read Rockman's response, which is what quotes are for and why we quote them ... he obviously views it that way.
User avatar

Regulator

Motherfucker from Hell

Postby Regulator » Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:11 pm

IvCNuB4 wrote:We don't know what's the truth yet. But the fact is Wood comes off as rational, calm and factual.
She came off like a hysterical loon on crack.

He was smart for waiting to respond. By letting her run her mouth she did all his his work for him :lol:


You don't know what the truth is, but the rest of the post indicates that you don't actually care because a woman who isn't a robot is automatically crazy and probably lying.
User avatar

Eric Ratcliffe

Staff Writer

Postby Eric Ratcliffe » Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:14 pm

Regulator wrote:
You don't know what the truth is, but the rest of the post indicates that you don't actually care because a woman who isn't a robot is automatically crazy and probably lying.


Dude, put your white knight shit away. He didn't even say anything of the sort. He stated how he thought she came off in her tweets. :smt011
User avatar

dairydead

Humuhumunukunukuapuaa

Postby dairydead » Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:15 pm

Regulator wrote:
You don't know what the truth is, but the rest of the post indicates that you don't actually care because a woman who isn't a robot is automatically crazy and probably lying.


It's not about not being a robot,its about using profanity and name calling in an overly hysterical fashion. I don't get what's so hard to understand
User avatar

GLX

Outhouse Editor

Postby GLX » Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:50 pm






Keep in mind:


User avatar

Draco x

biny little tird

Postby Draco x » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:01 pm

IvCNuB4 wrote:We don't know what's the truth yet. But the fact is Wood comes off as rational, calm and factual.
She came off like a hysterical loon on crack.

He was smart for waiting to respond. By letting her run her mouth she did all his his work for him :lol:


Agreed. Regardless of who is telling the truth, Woods' Twitter statements made him look better than hers.
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:21 pm

Draco x wrote:
Agreed. Regardless of who is telling the truth, Woods' Twitter statements made him look better than hers.


It's good we focus on the important things.

mbulcher

Faster Pussycat

Postby mbulcher » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:24 pm

While this entire situation is deeply depressing, the conversation it sparked is a much-needed one. As a fan of Wood's work, I was glad to see him respond the way he did. This is complicated stuff, and there was way too much knee-jerking going on in the first 24 hours. The self-righteousness and spiteful piggy-backing was absolutely over the top. But hey, it's the internet, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

The news sites (particularly CBR) who either waited, or declined, to report on this until both sides spoke up have earned my respect. The rest? Not so much.
User avatar

xaraan

Staff Writer

Postby xaraan » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:47 pm

mbulcher wrote:While this entire situation is deeply depressing, the conversation it sparked is a much-needed one. As a fan of Wood's work, I was glad to see him respond the way he did. This is complicated stuff, and there was way too much knee-jerking going on in the first 24 hours. The self-righteousness and spiteful piggy-backing was absolutely over the top. But hey, it's the internet, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

The news sites (particularly CBR) who either waited, or declined, to report on this until both sides spoke up have earned my respect. The rest? Not so much.




I mean, really, this is a stupid comment. For all you know the sites running the news and getting it out there is what pushed Wood to release a statement. Why would he bother if there was only someone tweeting things and every single website sat on the news. Plus, Wood was reached out to. Things do happen behind the scenes at websites. Let's get something straight, sites like CBR don't wait for the sake of news, they wait so they don't piss off industry buddies.

The story was reported by every site that ran it before now completely straight with no sides taken, just as news should be done.

I guess by this thinking, news programs shouldn't report on anything until every side gets to insert their PR. Why do a report on a suspect being arrested for a crime if we haven't received an official statement from the suspect yet? Why do a report on anything Snowden reveals about the government if we haven't waited to get an official statement from the gov't.

leave a comment with facebook


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chessack, Google [Bot], senwolf, uz000 and 67 guests