Advertisement

British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorable Name

[ Facebook comments]

Discuss the latest comic book news, read previews and reviews of upcoming and recent comic books, talk about comics, vote on your favorites, and more!

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

LOLtron
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 19434
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:54 pm


British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorable Name

Postby LOLtron » Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:18 am

British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorable NameBritish Scandal about the writer's new League of Extraordinary Gentlemen comic!



That dastardly news rag The Guardian attempted to sully Her Majesty's Royal Diamond Jubilee Hangover Weekend by releasing a slanderous article about the final chapter of Alan Moore's League of Extraordinary Gentlemen: Century. The article incorrectly revealed the identity of the Moonchild, an Antichrist type figure fated to bring about all sorts of nonsense and pish posh into the world.

Those who'd not like to be spoiled should kindly avert their eyes and sip on some soothing Earl Grey tea instead.

The Guardian claimed that the Antichrist's identity was none other than Harry Potter, the boy wizard who has become as much a part of British culture as association football (that's soccer for you chaps across the pond) or poor dental hygiene. The British newspaper claimed it was an attack on modern pop culture and the shift in Hollywood to rely on income generating franchises as opposed to telling actual good stories.

The story generated a slew of outrage from the British Isles. "It's an outrage!" said Lord Francis R. Poppenbottoms, the Queen's Minister of Overrated Children's Literature. "Alan Moore should be ashamed of himself. Not only is he sporting that dreadfully long beard, he's also besmirching the greatest literary character that's ever existed." When asked to comment further, Lord Poppenbottoms adjusted his monocle, pulled out an umbrella and floated away, too upset to continue the interview.

However, we here at the Outhouse, have discovered a fundamental flaw in The Guardian's article. Alan Moore, long an advocate of not using other's characters without permission, would simply never use another person's character and sully it by turning him into a psychotic mass murderer that shoots lightning out of his wee'nhappy stick (that's a British term for penis, for you uneducated Americans).

"Harry Potter?" Alan Moore is alleged to have said from his English tower of sorcery. "Why would I disparage the Boy Who Lived like that?" Moore explained that nowhere in his comic do the words Harry or Potter appear and that had he wanted to write the character, he would have course referenced the boy wizard by name.

He went on to explain that his Antichrist figure comes from an entirely different secret wizard school in England that's only accessible by train from King's Cross and that the two characters possessing scars are entirely coincidental as are the characters' general appearances and friends who resemble Ron Weasley and Hermoine Granger.

"I have nothing but the greatest respect for Harry Potter," Moore said. "We're both wizards, we both have cult followings that blindly buy our merchandise and most importantly, we've both danced with the devil and his cohort during a full moon during the spring equinox."

Of course, Moore knows full well what it's like to have his characters used without his permission. Currently, those dastardly ne'er do wells over at DC are publishing Before Watchmen, an incredibly respectful prequel of Moore's seminal work, of which Moore still receives a portion of the profits, even if he refuses to cash the checks.  

It's simply absurd to believe that after all the justifiably indignant outrage that Moore has made about Before Watchmen, he would go one step further and steal someone else's intellectual property and sully it while using well known loopholes in copyright laws. To do something like that would not only be hypocritical but also patently unsporting and against the very rules of British society.

The Outhouse attempted to reach out to a real British citizen, but they were all unavailable eating biscuits or watching the telly.



Source: The Guardian
Written or Contributed by: ThanosCopter


http://www.theouthousers.com/index.php/news/comics-news/19910-british-newspaper-sullies-alan-moores-good-and-honorable-name.html/
Last edited by LOLtron on Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: JFusion Discussion Bot UPDATE
Image

Advertisement

Jubilee
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 20689
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:40 am
Formerly: Twigglet


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby Jubilee » Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:25 am

Heh. Can you imagine how much better comics would be if they were all on a level similar to Moore's work.
You don't have to like me
You don't have to respect me
But you will LISTEN to me.
-----
Always Right

BlueStreak
User avatar
The Red Stands for Irony
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:06 pm
Title: Bat-Min Inc.
Formerly: BlueStreak


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby BlueStreak » Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:26 am

Jubilee wrote:Heh. Can you imagine how much better comics would be if they were all on a level similar to Moore's work.


Lots more fish splooge being shown on page, I imagine.
Image

Timbales
User avatar
Fisty McDigger
 
Posts: 16896
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Title: Namaste, mother fucker
Formerly: timberoo


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby Timbales » Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:42 am

Jubilee wrote:Heh. Can you imagine how much better comics would be if they were all on a level similar to Moore's work.


I'd have a lot more money for other interests.
However, Liefeld is an enigma wrapped in a pouch-filled, muscular, footless conundrum.
Written or Contributed by ThanosCopter

Jubilee
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 20689
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:40 am
Formerly: Twigglet


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby Jubilee » Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:47 am

Timbales wrote:
I'd have a lot more money for other interests.


Yeah we'd lose a few fans, but overall comics would be much more popular and much more widely read.

Shame.
You don't have to like me
You don't have to respect me
But you will LISTEN to me.
-----
Always Right

Timbales
User avatar
Fisty McDigger
 
Posts: 16896
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Title: Namaste, mother fucker
Formerly: timberoo


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby Timbales » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:03 am

Jubilee wrote:
Yeah we'd lose a few fans, but overall comics would be much more popular and much more widely read.

Shame.


and monotonous
However, Liefeld is an enigma wrapped in a pouch-filled, muscular, footless conundrum.
Written or Contributed by ThanosCopter

Grayson
User avatar
Outhouse Drafter
 
Posts: 3946
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:34 am
Location: The Darkest Timeline
Title: The Intersect
Formerly: Sakie


Online


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby Grayson » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:04 am

Jubilee wrote:Yeah we'd lose a few fans, but overall comics would be much more popular and much more widely read.

Shame.


That's a great sentiment but it's far from being a fact. Just because something is good, no matter how good it may be, doesn't automatically equate it with being successful or popular.

Look at Hollywood. There are dozens of wonderful creators and actors buts it's movies like Avatar and Transformers that make the big bucks. Or you can look at television. Once again, there are tons of great shows with a wonderful cast and crew that struggle each season, if they even get a second season while shows like Jersey Shore and the Kardashians keep getting renewed without a second thought.

GHERU
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 36385
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby GHERU » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:06 am

Jubilee wrote:Heh. Can you imagine how much better comics would be if they were all on a level similar to Moore's work.

Considering his recent products I'd say comics would be worse off.

Jubilee
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 20689
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:40 am
Formerly: Twigglet


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby Jubilee » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:06 am

Sakie wrote:
That's a great sentiment but it's far from being a fact. Just because something is good, no matter how good it may be, doesn't automatically equate it with being successful or popular.

Look at Hollywood. There are dozens of wonderful creators and actors buts it's movies like Avatar and Transformers that make the big bucks. Or you can look at television. Once again, there are tons of great shows with a wonderful cast and crew that struggle each season, if they even get a second season while shows like Jersey Shore and the Kardashians keep getting renewed without a second thought.


But Moore's work is much more widely read than most "popular" comics.
You don't have to like me
You don't have to respect me
But you will LISTEN to me.
-----
Always Right

GHERU
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 36385
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby GHERU » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:09 am

Jubilee wrote:
But Moore's work is much more widely read than most "popular" comics.

The two books that were made into movies, maybe
But, Albion, fish sex, lost girls, top ten, ect... not so much

Jubilee
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 20689
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:40 am
Formerly: Twigglet


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby Jubilee » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:10 am

GHERU wrote:The two books that were made into movies, maybe
But, Albion, fish sex, lost girls, top ten, ect... not so much


Which two books? V for Vendetta, Watchmen, From Hell or LOEG?
You don't have to like me
You don't have to respect me
But you will LISTEN to me.
-----
Always Right

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 31670
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:27 am
Location: UK
Title: Shitlord


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby Punchy » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:11 am

GHERU wrote:The two books that were made into movies, maybe
But, Albion, fish sex, lost girls, top ten, ect... not so much


Top Ten was awesome.

GHERU
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 36385
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby GHERU » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:12 am

Punchy wrote:
Top Ten was awesome.

I liked it
It didn't sell better than most comics

GHERU
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 36385
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby GHERU » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:13 am

Jubilee wrote:
Which two books? V for Vendetta, Watchmen, From Hell or LOEG?

V and wm
Lxg and fh are not being read by the masses more than other comics

Jubilee
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 20689
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:40 am
Formerly: Twigglet


Re: British Newspaper Sullies Alan Moore's Good and Honorabl

Postby Jubilee » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:15 am

GHERU wrote:V and wm
Lxg and fh are not being read by the masses more than other comics


Of course they are!
You don't have to like me
You don't have to respect me
But you will LISTEN to me.
-----
Always Right

leave a comment with facebook

Next

Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FaceBook [Linkcheck] and 61 guests

Advertisement