Advertisement

Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

[ Facebook comments]

Discuss the latest comic book news, read previews and reviews of upcoming and recent comic books, talk about comics, vote on your favorites, and more!

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

GHERU
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 36362
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby GHERU » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:03 pm

Cat-Scratch wrote:I liked the V For Vendetta GN more then the Watchmen GN. I also enjoyed Batman Year One GN more then Watchmen too.

For me, Watchmen felt being forced on me by the shops and other fans going on and on and on about it. It's good, maybe even great but honestly... not the greatest.

My choice for greatest GN is Katsuhiro Otomo's Domu: A Child's Dream.

I think I lucked out in that I read Watchmen before I ever joined the online comic book community. My comic book guy recommended it and that was that. I didn't have any hype to color my expectations.
RUviews
Benderbrau wrote:Welcome to the Outhouse. Where civility means you're doing it wrong.

Advertisement

Cat-Scratch
User avatar
A Damn Cuddly Beast
 
Posts: 60537
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby Cat-Scratch » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:06 pm

lol wrote:My favorite GN of all time would be the Complete Maus.

Watchmen is by far and away the best superhero story of all time.


You mean you think it is.
Image
Strict31 wrote:To quote Hunter S. Thompson, there is nothing more despicable than a cat in the depths of a nip binge..
Strict31 wrote:Listen to Feline Mussolini.
Strict31 wrote:You're goddamned insane.
achilles wrote:Pay no attention to Cat-Scratch people; he's insane from all that cat-nip.
Lord Simian wrote:"Us"? This is YOUR Kongdamn fault, mister "Bets on when this place will break again"....
Psivage wrote:Don't trust a cat. They are always up to no good.
Ragnascratch is coming... maybe.
/人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\

Cat-Scratch
User avatar
A Damn Cuddly Beast
 
Posts: 60537
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby Cat-Scratch » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:13 pm

GHERU wrote:I think I lucked out in that I read Watchmen before I ever joined the online comic book community. My comic book guy recommended it and that was that. I didn't have any hype to color my expectations.


For me, it was as it was coming out. I ended up borrowing it from a friend as a monthly.

At the time, it was an easy to see thing for folks to go crazy over. There were not that many minis or real graphic novels at the time and the concept was just really getting going. Prior stuff like Chamelot 3000 just didn't have the same thing. Also, the only other ones really about in 86 was either Miller's Batman YO or Dark Knight. The only other thing was Byrne's Man Of Steel.

Back then, the LCSes were just like the online forums on new comic day(s) and Saturdays. Folks just spoke out with opinions when anyone was around. It's why I hate Marvel Zombies too... they never shut up... :roll: but back then, I could punch them.
Image
Strict31 wrote:To quote Hunter S. Thompson, there is nothing more despicable than a cat in the depths of a nip binge..
Strict31 wrote:Listen to Feline Mussolini.
Strict31 wrote:You're goddamned insane.
achilles wrote:Pay no attention to Cat-Scratch people; he's insane from all that cat-nip.
Lord Simian wrote:"Us"? This is YOUR Kongdamn fault, mister "Bets on when this place will break again"....
Psivage wrote:Don't trust a cat. They are always up to no good.
Ragnascratch is coming... maybe.
/人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\

BlueStreak
User avatar
The Red Stands for Irony
 
Posts: 11969
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:06 pm
Title: Bat-Min Inc.
Formerly: BlueStreak


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby BlueStreak » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:20 pm

Twigglet's right.

All of the great literary classics don't have sequels. The Three Musketeers, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, The Wizard of Oz are all examples of this. I'm glad that the publishers never sunk so low as to try to exploit these books for additional titles.

Furthermore, just think of how tarnished books such as The Chronicles of Narnia, Hamlet, Pride and Prejudice, The Lord of the Rings, Robinson Crusoe or The Aeneid would be had someone besides the author ever wrote a sequel to them. They'd probably be ruined forever.
Image

Jubilee
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 20673
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:40 am
Formerly: Twigglet


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby Jubilee » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:25 pm

BlueStreak wrote:Twigglet's right.

All of the great literary classics don't have sequels. The Three Musketeers, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, The Wizard of Oz are all examples of this. I'm glad that the publishers never sunk so low as to try to exploit these books for additional titles.

Furthermore, just think of how tarnished books such as The Chronicles of Narnia, Hamlet, Pride and Prejudice, The Lord of the Rings, Robinson Crusoe or The Aeneid would be had someone besides the author ever wrote a sequel to them. They'd probably be ruined forever.


You're talking different fields completely. Watchmen is the one comic we can all say is technically amazing. A story which is known as better than anything else.

Look at Star Wars, Dark Knight Returns, The Phoenix Saga and Indiana Jones as franchises which have lost a lot of luster after their original stories were tampered with.

This was a book which purposely didn't set up for a sequel or prequel. All the prequel stuff is already there in the preview. This is a literacy travesty, and we're all accepting of it because a company wants to make money.

BTW - Hamlet and Pride and Prejudices sequels? You're reaching.
You don't have to like me
You don't have to respect me
But you will LISTEN to me.
-----
Always Right

Cat-Scratch
User avatar
A Damn Cuddly Beast
 
Posts: 60537
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby Cat-Scratch » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:26 pm

BlueStreak wrote:Twigglet's right.

All of the great literary classics don't have sequels. The Three Musketeers, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, The Wizard of Oz are all examples of this. I'm glad that the publishers never sunk so low as to try to exploit these books for additional titles.

Furthermore, just think of how tarnished books such as The Chronicles of Narnia, Hamlet, Pride and Prejudice, The Lord of the Rings, Robinson Crusoe or The Aeneid would be had someone besides the author ever wrote a sequel to them. They'd probably be ruined forever.



:?

Hamlet is a book?
Image
Strict31 wrote:To quote Hunter S. Thompson, there is nothing more despicable than a cat in the depths of a nip binge..
Strict31 wrote:Listen to Feline Mussolini.
Strict31 wrote:You're goddamned insane.
achilles wrote:Pay no attention to Cat-Scratch people; he's insane from all that cat-nip.
Lord Simian wrote:"Us"? This is YOUR Kongdamn fault, mister "Bets on when this place will break again"....
Psivage wrote:Don't trust a cat. They are always up to no good.
Ragnascratch is coming... maybe.
/人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\

GHERU
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 36362
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby GHERU » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:26 pm

BlueStreak wrote:Twigglet's right.

All of the great literary classics don't have sequels. The Three Musketeers, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, The Wizard of Oz are all examples of this. I'm glad that the publishers never sunk so low as to try to exploit these books for additional titles.

Furthermore, just think of how tarnished books such as The Chronicles of Narnia, Hamlet, Pride and Prejudice, The Lord of the Rings, Robinson Crusoe or The Aeneid would be had someone besides the author ever wrote a sequel to them. They'd probably be ruined forever.

Image
RUviews
Benderbrau wrote:Welcome to the Outhouse. Where civility means you're doing it wrong.

Cat-Scratch
User avatar
A Damn Cuddly Beast
 
Posts: 60537
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby Cat-Scratch » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:27 pm

GHERU wrote:Image


And Twigg fell for it. :lol:
Image
Strict31 wrote:To quote Hunter S. Thompson, there is nothing more despicable than a cat in the depths of a nip binge..
Strict31 wrote:Listen to Feline Mussolini.
Strict31 wrote:You're goddamned insane.
achilles wrote:Pay no attention to Cat-Scratch people; he's insane from all that cat-nip.
Lord Simian wrote:"Us"? This is YOUR Kongdamn fault, mister "Bets on when this place will break again"....
Psivage wrote:Don't trust a cat. They are always up to no good.
Ragnascratch is coming... maybe.
/人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\

GHERU
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 36362
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby GHERU » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:33 pm

Hamlet 2 > Hamlet
RUviews
Benderbrau wrote:Welcome to the Outhouse. Where civility means you're doing it wrong.

Cat-Scratch
User avatar
A Damn Cuddly Beast
 
Posts: 60537
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby Cat-Scratch » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:43 pm

GHERU wrote:Hamlet 2 > Hamlet


"Hamlet 2 - To Be or Not To Be... HARDER!!!!"

"Ophelia's back and now... she's a bitch."
Image
Strict31 wrote:To quote Hunter S. Thompson, there is nothing more despicable than a cat in the depths of a nip binge..
Strict31 wrote:Listen to Feline Mussolini.
Strict31 wrote:You're goddamned insane.
achilles wrote:Pay no attention to Cat-Scratch people; he's insane from all that cat-nip.
Lord Simian wrote:"Us"? This is YOUR Kongdamn fault, mister "Bets on when this place will break again"....
Psivage wrote:Don't trust a cat. They are always up to no good.
Ragnascratch is coming... maybe.
/人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\

Herald
User avatar
Humuhumunukunukuapuaa
 
Posts: 10197
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:47 am
Title: Fun for the Whole Family!!


Online


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby Herald » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:47 pm

Cat-Scratch wrote:
"Hamlet 2 - To Be or Not To Be... HARDER!!!!"

"Ophelia's back and now... she's a bitch."


:smt011

"Hamlet 2 - The ORIGINAL Emo Kid is BACK!! And he's only BEGUN to hem and haw!!"

Cat-Scratch
User avatar
A Damn Cuddly Beast
 
Posts: 60537
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby Cat-Scratch » Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:51 pm

Herald wrote:
:smt011

"Hamlet 2 - The ORIGINAL Emo Kid is BACK!! And he's only BEGUN to hem and haw!!"


"Hamlet 2 - That Dane Bastard"

"Hamlet 2 - Zombies Attack!"
Image
Strict31 wrote:To quote Hunter S. Thompson, there is nothing more despicable than a cat in the depths of a nip binge..
Strict31 wrote:Listen to Feline Mussolini.
Strict31 wrote:You're goddamned insane.
achilles wrote:Pay no attention to Cat-Scratch people; he's insane from all that cat-nip.
Lord Simian wrote:"Us"? This is YOUR Kongdamn fault, mister "Bets on when this place will break again"....
Psivage wrote:Don't trust a cat. They are always up to no good.
Ragnascratch is coming... maybe.
/人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\

Stephen Day
User avatar
Wrasslin' Fan
 
Posts: 27456
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Canada
Title: Maple Leaf Ninja


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby Stephen Day » Thu Dec 01, 2011 10:34 pm

Image
Image

Thank you Troy for the sig

GHERU
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 36362
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby GHERU » Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:03 pm

Stephen Day wrote:Image

Stephen knows whats up
RUviews
Benderbrau wrote:Welcome to the Outhouse. Where civility means you're doing it wrong.

BlueStreak
User avatar
The Red Stands for Irony
 
Posts: 11969
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:06 pm
Title: Bat-Min Inc.
Formerly: BlueStreak


Re: Does DC need to prove Alan Moore right?

Postby BlueStreak » Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:41 pm

lol wrote:
BTW - Hamlet and Pride and Prejudices sequels? You're reaching.


Both Hamlet and Pride and Prejudice have spawn multiple sequels. Hell, Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are Dead is actually pretty good.
Image

leave a comment with facebook

PreviousNext

Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], xaraan, Yahoo [Bot] and 74 guests

Advertisement