Thursday, July 28, 2016 • Evening Edition • "This is not rocket science, people. Get a grip."

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!

Advertisement

Get Ready For The Shitstorm: DC Edition [SPOILERS for JLA #4]

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

legoroni

Snake On A Plane

Postby legoroni » Sun Jun 02, 2013 12:15 am

This is probably someone pretending to be Catwoman. I can't see DC killing her off. Plus, she currently has an ongoing which isn't ending
User avatar

Lord Ice

Motherfucker from Hell

Postby Lord Ice » Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:58 am

Don't think we'd get lucky enough and find out it was really Harper Row.
User avatar

habitual

Silly French Man

Postby habitual » Sun Jun 02, 2013 9:34 am

IvCNuB4 wrote:Was the moral outrage as high when this happened ? Serious question. I don't remember what the on-line reaction was.

Image


Since Image doesn't have the same rep as DC for "fridging women", its not relally relevant.

I'd also argue that TWD is a comic written for a much older audience than JLA.

Hab
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Sun Jun 02, 2013 9:47 am

IvCNuB4 wrote:Was the moral outrage as high when this happened ? Serious question. I don't remember what the on-line reaction was.

Image


...

You know they were killed by a woman, right? :wink:

Do you really read the book and remember the circumstances of that death (and yeah, many people were upset about it, but...)?

The Gov. bullies one of the women under his control to fire as the escapees flee, cutting Lori and the baby down. But afterwards, grief-stricken with what she's done, she flips and kills The Governor.
First off, there's a lot more going on there. Secondly, there's a resolution that follows, not a typical superhero comic book story of the usual dupes or mistaken identities drawn out for who knows how many issues.

BUT, having said all that, all you have to do is google "Robert Kirkman sexism misogyny" to see that the guy has gotten his share of online chastising--most recently for his comment that women are physically weaker according to science!

The reaction from readers seemed stronger in the letters columns when Glenn was killed, because a) readers actually liked the character, b) there was no near-immediate retribution for the killer.
User avatar

IvCNuB4

Staff Writer

Postby IvCNuB4 » Sun Jun 02, 2013 1:48 pm

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:The issue is that it's been established that the comics industry, and DC in particular, has a bad habit of using female characters as props to be raped, tortured, killed, or stuffed in refrigerators for the purpose of affecting male characters. So when they do it again so graphically, even if it's just temporary or a red herring, it calls attention to all the other times they did it.

Whether you agree or not, you can certainly see how it would be inviting exactly this kind of criticism.


Interesting point. But then where was the Front Page article of righteous indignation over this cover from just last month :smt017

Image

Which surely then must have dug up the emotional impact of these previous disturbingly dark and edgy moments :P

Image
Image
ImageImage
Image
Image
Image
Image
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:21 pm

IvCNuB4 wrote:
Interesting point. But then where was the Front Page article of righteous indignation over this cover from just last month :smt017

Image

Which surely then must have dug up the emotional impact of these previous disturbingly dark and edgy moments :P

Image
Image
ImageImage
Image
Image
Image
Image
ImageImageImageImageImage


Can't see the cover, so can't respond. :P
User avatar

Tintin Quarantino

Rain Partier

Postby Tintin Quarantino » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:23 pm

I don't have the slightest idea who that is on that cover.

Maybe it's because no one cared? :lol:
User avatar

Punchy

Staff Writer

Postby Punchy » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:25 pm

IvC, one of those images is of consensual sex between two people who would later get married and have a kid, it doesn't really fit.
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:26 pm

Now I see it. I do remember seeing that cover and finding it absurd that what appears to be a somewhat shiny vinyl or leather outfit still allows Monet's ribs and belly button still show through it.

But as for her death itself, it was built up to for a while and clearly meant to have emotional impact on its own and wasn't meant, let alone implicitly stated, to be for the purpose of affecting a male character.
User avatar

IvCNuB4

Staff Writer

Postby IvCNuB4 » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:49 pm

Punchy wrote:IvC, one of those images is of consensual sex between two people who would later get married and have a kid, it doesn't really fit.


Yeah, and she's gritting her teeth out of ecstacy :lol:
Oh no, it's out of "pain ... humility .. anger"

I don't think Hallmark makes a card for that :lol:

S.F. Jude Terror wrote:But as for her death itself, it was built up to for a while and clearly meant to have emotional impact on its own and wasn't meant, let alone implicitly stated, to be for the purpose of affecting a male character.


So graphic violence against women is cool as long as it's for emotional impact. That explains nailing Jubilee to a cross.
Gotcha :lol:
User avatar

Grayson

Outhouse Drafter

Postby Grayson » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:53 pm

Punchy wrote:IvC, one of those images is of consensual sex between two people who would later get married and have a kid, it doesn't really fit.


I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that they didn't conceive their child on that particular night... :smt102
User avatar

IvCNuB4

Staff Writer

Postby IvCNuB4 » Sun Jun 02, 2013 3:00 pm

Grayson wrote:
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that they didn't conceive their child on that particular night... :smt102


Dude, we're talking about a universe where Carol Danver's own son impregnated her so he could be born :lol:
User avatar

Grayson

Outhouse Drafter

Postby Grayson » Sun Jun 02, 2013 3:05 pm

IvCNuB4 wrote:Dude, we're talking about a universe where Carol Danver's own son impregnated her so he could be born :lol:


Carol Danver's own son impregnating her so he could be born is more plausible than Luke Cage impregnating Jessica Jones while giving her the old Nutter Butter Fudge Slide. :P
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Sun Jun 02, 2013 3:08 pm

IvCNuB4 wrote:
Yeah, and she's gritting her teeth out of ecstacy :lol:
Oh no, it's out of "pain ... humility .. anger"

I don't think Hallmark makes a card for that :lol:



So graphic violence against women is cool as long as it's for emotional impact. That explains nailing Jubilee to a cross.
Gotcha :lol:


It's not okay. :lol: I don't know why you get the impression I'm defending Marvel. When Marvel gets my attention, I make fun of them the same as anyone else. I mean, you WERE around for the entirety of the Avengers vs. X-Men event, right?

I think Marvel just plays it smart. We only received one press release from them last week, the one about the website revamp (which I made fun of). I think they may have covertly almost-blacklisted us, but are smart enough to stay quiet about it instead of dumbly bringing Zechs in a room to berate him so we can muckrake to great profit in response. :P
User avatar

BlueStreak

The Red Stands for Irony

Postby BlueStreak » Sun Jun 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Also, Nac bitched and moaned about that X-Factor cover, IIRC.

leave a comment with facebook


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 65 guests