Advertisement

Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

[ Facebook comments]

Discuss the latest comic book news, read previews and reviews of upcoming and recent comic books, talk about comics, vote on your favorites, and more!

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

doombug
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 12000
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: Holden, Ma


Online


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby doombug » Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:22 am

Jubilee wrote:But they do get it. They've shown that by making Superman darker and admitting Green lantern was focussed too much on space.

Do you know where Wonder Woman and Doom Patrol is? On the scrap heap because they were shitty ideas.

70 PERCENT OF THAT MOVIE TAKES PLACE ON EARTH!!! :smt005

If you've seen a cut of the movie that we all haven't then please god share it with us, because actually placing the movie more in space like the original script that leaked would have been so much better.
Image

Image

Advertisement

Jubilee
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 20673
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:40 am
Formerly: Twigglet


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby Jubilee » Sun Jul 01, 2012 2:30 am

Can we stop talking about stuff like Jonah Hex and Punisher. Those films had a meagre budget. They were never going to be amazing.

Also Superman Returns was dark?

I said ever since GL come out that it would fail. I knew right away. Because I knew that that type of film would not resonate with a larger community. Everyone with a brain could see Avengers would do well. Films have to be grounded in reality. That's why Iron Man, Batman and X-men have been the best films. They all took away some of the more fantastical parts of the character, and made them grounded. Did the X-men wear yellow spandex? Did they showcase any of the more ridiculous mutants?

GL was destined to fail. Not because it was "crap" or because it was marketed poorly but because it is a certain type of movie that very rarely resonates with the general public. Same with John Carter. Same with Prometheus. And hell when you've got one of the higher ups in the biggest movie studio in the world agreeing with me, then y'know maybe I'm not far wrong.

Avengers doesn't disprove anything. It was the first of it's nature. A film they spent five films building towards.

There are exceptions to every trend, but there's not many exceptions to the trend that "most films dealing primarily with aliens in the last five years have flopped" and I'd amend that to include "especially if this was not based on an existing movie franchise".

Remember when Green Lantern was coming out and I had this same argument with you all? Nieto claimed there would be people growing up on these comics that couldn't wait to see it. Jack Burton said "There is no way this will flop". I just have a perspective of your everyday 18-30 male I think some of you lack.
You don't have to like me
You don't have to respect me
But you will LISTEN to me.
-----
Always Right

Jubilee
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 20673
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:40 am
Formerly: Twigglet


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby Jubilee » Sun Jul 01, 2012 2:33 am

doombug wrote:70 PERCENT OF THAT MOVIE TAKES PLACE ON EARTH!!! :smt005

If you've seen a cut of the movie that we all haven't then please god share it with us, because actually placing the movie more in space like the original script that leaked would have been so much better.


Most comic book fans could not wait for the Green Lantern movie, which did alright on it's opening weekend, but quickly fizzled out shortly afterward at the domestic box office. The film, according to Box Office Mojo, garnered only $114 million domestic (only $40 million foreign, based on numbers as of July 31st) and cost a projected $200 million to produce.


Needless to say, the film did not bode well for Warner Brothers who has yet to see a profit for the Green Lantern movie. Most movie companies would can a project that cost so much to make and saw so little in return; but apparently not Warner Brothers. The film studio still sees Green Lantern as a property that, with the right vision, could be huge.

The WB is looking ahead to the sequel to the Green Lantern movie, according to the Warner Brothers film group President Jeff Robinov -- only next time, the movie needs to be "darker" and "edgier."

“We had a decent opening so we learned there is an audience,” said Warner Bros. film group President Jeff Robinov, pointing to the film’s box office debut of $53 million. “To go forward we need to make it a little edgier and darker with more emphasis on action…. And we have to find a way to balance the time the movie spends in space versus on Earth.”

--------------------------------

Listen, when a man like that speaks. One of the most important men in Hollywood you have to listen.
You don't have to like me
You don't have to respect me
But you will LISTEN to me.
-----
Always Right

Jubilee
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 20673
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:40 am
Formerly: Twigglet


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby Jubilee » Sun Jul 01, 2012 2:44 am

ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage

That right there is the top 16 flops of the last decade. I guess it's a major coincidence in all your eyes that over half of these films are space based and sci-fi is the major genre in the list?
You don't have to like me
You don't have to respect me
But you will LISTEN to me.
-----
Always Right

dairydead
User avatar
FROGMAN
 
Posts: 8820
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 2:12 am
Location: Detroit


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby dairydead » Sun Jul 01, 2012 2:46 am

Jubilee wrote:ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage

That right there is the top 16 flops of the last decade. I guess it's a major coincidence in all your eyes that over half of these films are space based and sci-fi is the major genre in the list?


As said earlier, space-based movies are more expensive on average.
The Firelord to Hawk's Galactus

sdsichero
User avatar
2k11 Outhouse People's Champion
 
Posts: 60743
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:25 pm
Location: Secret Base, Honolulu, HI
Title: 仮面ライダー バトライド・ウォー
Formerly: beta-ray


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby sdsichero » Sun Jul 01, 2012 2:52 am

Not of this decade but many of them are from this decade... the top 16 box office gross...

1 Avatar
2 Titanic
3 Marvel's The Avengers
4 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2
5 Transformers: Dark of the Moon
6 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
7 Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
8 Toy Story 3
9 Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides
10 Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
11 Alice in Wonderland (2010)
12 The Dark Knight
13 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
14 Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
15 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1
16 The Lion King
ImageImageImageImageImageImage

dairydead
User avatar
FROGMAN
 
Posts: 8820
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 2:12 am
Location: Detroit


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby dairydead » Sun Jul 01, 2012 2:55 am

sdsichero wrote:Not of this decade but many of them are from this decade... the top 16 box office gross...

1 Avatar
2 Titanic
3 Marvel's The Avengers
4 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2
5 Transformers: Dark of the Moon
6 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
7 Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
8 Toy Story 3
9 Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides
10 Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
11 Alice in Wonderland (2010)
12 The Dark Knight
13 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
14 Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
15 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1
16 The Lion King


literally one of those could be considered "grim and gritty" ( TDK)
The Firelord to Hawk's Galactus

Jubilee
User avatar
Review Grouper
 
Posts: 20673
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:40 am
Formerly: Twigglet


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby Jubilee » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:03 am

Listen when I say "grim and gritty" I don't literally mean going full on TDK territory. That G&G thing is not what I mean. I just mean it has to be more relateable. Based somewhat on reality. Films like Hulk and Green Lantern are always going to struggle.
You don't have to like me
You don't have to respect me
But you will LISTEN to me.
-----
Always Right

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 31599
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:27 am
Location: UK
Title: Shitlord


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby Punchy » Sun Jul 01, 2012 5:49 am

Sitebreaker wrote:Why in the hell would a movie about a guy who wields a ring that makes LIGHT constructs and his codename comes from the name of an object that makes LIGHT need to be dark?


Ask Geoff Johns, his incredibly successful run on GL is dark as hell, Black Lanterns, Red Lanterns, all of it is grim.

Chris
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 40247
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Title: Stuff Writer
Formerly: Chris


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby Chris » Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:16 am

Punchy wrote:
Ask Geoff Johns, his incredibly successful run on GL is dark as hell, Black Lanterns, Red Lanterns, all of it is grim.


And honestly, it has gotten pretty tedious as a result.

The Sinestro Corps War was it's peak.
Image

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 31599
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:27 am
Location: UK
Title: Shitlord


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby Punchy » Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:24 am

Holland Oats wrote:
And honestly, it has gotten pretty tedious as a result.

The Sinestro Corps War was it's peak.


But it still sells and is what turned Green Lantern into the 3rd biggest character franchise at DC.

Doc Jon
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 28775
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:51 pm
Location: Jersey
Formerly: Doc Spider


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby Doc Jon » Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:28 am

Jubilee wrote:Listen when I say "grim and gritty" I don't literally mean going full on TDK territory. That G&G thing is not what I mean. I just mean it has to be more relateable. Based somewhat on reality. Films like Hulk and Green Lantern are always going to struggle.


:-D

The HUlk is one of the most relatable characters in comics.

I just kind of get the feeling that you have your arguments twisted.

Is it grim and gritty? When it suits you.
Is it just space movies? When it suits you.
Is it bright superheroes? When it suits you.

There are franchises that are difficult to pull off. THat's pretty much it.

Prometheus was dark as hell (at least from the previews), but I guess in that case, it was space.

Transformers DotM was heavily based on space, from the moon landing, to bringing Cybertron to Earth and so on, but it made money.

The Avengers was bright as hell, had invading aliens from another dimension, a space god, a space tyrant and so on, but it's number 3 on the all time grossing films list.

And wasn't it your contention (admittedly in jest) that GL would kill superhero films? How's that going?
Image


HJJOUNB SAWLWEN HATES MEO!!!! -Royal

Rockman
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 24556
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:25 pm
Formerly: AMS


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby Rockman » Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:42 am

The first Hulk was on track to be a huge hit before word of mouth got out that it was not a good movie. Seriously like an 80% drop off after the first week.

It's due to that awful film that the second movie didn't make as much bank.

syxxpakk
User avatar
Wrasslin' Fan
 
Posts: 9466
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:13 pm
Title: The Wrasslin' Fan


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby syxxpakk » Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:54 am

I like how of the top 16 box-office movies, only one is a movie with no fantastical elements.
Image

"Hogan is trying to get Yokozuna into WCW. Remember, he still has a win he needs to get back" - The Wrestling Observer Newsletter: December 08, 1997

syxxpakk
User avatar
Wrasslin' Fan
 
Posts: 9466
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:13 pm
Title: The Wrasslin' Fan


Re: Guardians of the Galaxy: A Primer

Postby syxxpakk » Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:54 am

And it seems safe to say third Hulk movie, following the Avengers, would do great business.
Image

"Hogan is trying to get Yokozuna into WCW. Remember, he still has a win he needs to get back" - The Wrestling Observer Newsletter: December 08, 1997

leave a comment with facebook

PreviousNext

Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AgentAshe, doombug and 37 guests

Advertisement