Advertisement

Joe Q justifies price increase again

[ Facebook comments]

Discuss the latest comic book news, read previews and reviews of upcoming and recent comic books, talk about comics, vote on your favorites, and more!

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

Dragavon
User avatar
Podcaster
 
Posts: 18604
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:35 am
Location: NJ
Title: Married
Formerly: Ben Reilly


Postby Dragavon » Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:19 pm

Derm wrote:I know Marvel is putting some of there old stuff online but has anybody heard anything about them or DC ever putting out the latest stuff?
I haven't bought comics regularly for years, just the odd trade, and while there is a bunch of titles I be happy to follow I wouldn't even consider it at the present cost never mind this new increase.

They are never going to do that as long as it profitable to sell issues at stores.

This may make me a villain but I either Byrne-steal or download what I want, and then buy it in trade.
Image

Advertisement

outsider
User avatar
Outhouse Drafter
 
Posts: 29993
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 1:35 pm


Postby outsider » Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:22 pm

Why do comics companies go with the ass-opposite approach to price increases as the USPS on stamps (who should really quit beating about the bush and increase by a whole nickel every five years instead of this penny crap)? Why not small incremental increases of a nickel here and ten cents there? A frickin' dollar is too much to ask a lot of consumers.
Some men just want to watch the world burn.

MoneyMelon
User avatar
Chief Yankee Wanker
 
Posts: 26403
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 10:02 pm
Title: Internet Celebrity


Postby MoneyMelon » Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:40 pm

Dragavon wrote:This may make me a villain but I either Byrne-steal or download what I want, and then buy it in trade.

I think it just means you aren't full of shit. I bet a lot of people do the same thing.

Hell, I'd do it myself, but I just don't like reading comics on my computer.
Image

Man of Steel wrote:get over myself? You're the one who fancies himself some sort of internet celebrity.

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 31670
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:27 am
Location: UK
Title: Shitlord


Postby Punchy » Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:42 pm

Just means I'll drop more DC books.

Dragavon
User avatar
Podcaster
 
Posts: 18604
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:35 am
Location: NJ
Title: Married
Formerly: Ben Reilly


Postby Dragavon » Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:44 pm

MoneyMelon wrote:I think it just means you aren't full of shit. I bet a lot of people do the same thing.

Hell, I'd do it myself, but I just don't like reading comics on my computer.

It's cheaper than buying the issues and I hate waiting for the trade. Plus it's a lot easier to organize.
Image

Zenguru
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 12667
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: West-by-God-Virginia!


Postby Zenguru » Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:34 pm

Punchy wrote:Just means I'll drop more DC books.
Even though DC books are generally cheaper? And better?

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 31670
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:27 am
Location: UK
Title: Shitlord


Postby Punchy » Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:43 pm

Zenguru wrote:Even though DC books are generally cheaper? And better?


Better?

Get real.

JL_Amato
User avatar
rubber spoon
 
Posts: 6871
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 2:08 pm


Postby JL_Amato » Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:45 pm

Punchy wrote:Better?

Get real.

This.

The only title I'm really enjoying from DC right now is Secret Six.
Image

GLX
User avatar
Outhouse Editor
 
Posts: 37409
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:40 pm
Title: Leader of The Society


Postby GLX » Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:46 pm

Punchy wrote:Better?

Get real.


:lol:

In all seriousness, Punchy is right. Marvel has a deep list of talent to work with.

Writer side examples: Aaron, Bendis, Millar, Fraction, Brubaker, Hickman.

Artist side examples: McNiven, Rivera, Pacheco, Choi, Hitch, Immonen.
Image

john lewis wrote:Everyone but GLX has no taste.

Derm
User avatar
Rorshach Test Subject
 
Posts: 930
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: England


Postby Derm » Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:13 pm

Dragavon wrote:They are never going to do that as long as it profitable to sell issues at stores.

This may make me a villain but I either Byrne-steal or download what I want, and then buy it in trade.

My own version of the "Byrne-steal" is I just read my brother's copies.
His about 10 years younger then me, single and doesn't drink so he has a healthy disposable income.
On the point of online versions vs. print I don't see why they can't do both. If they had some monthly charge where you could read all their titles online and still sold the physical copies in the shop. Your comic book collector isn't going anywhere and might even end up going both routes. Buying the ones he has always read and subscribing just so he could keep up with the universe as a whole.
Then once you are online start selling that shit where the kids are hanging out. Facebook or whatever they are doing these days.
Or work out a deal with some MMO's to make yourself part of that experience.
Might not suit a setting like Warcraft but if you can order Dominos Pizza through the game then why not comics.
Give you something to do through those boring grind parts.
I don't know if my ideas are practical but I just think they really need to try and advantage of the net because that’s where everybody is now.

Midas
User avatar
Post Whore
 
Posts: 1068
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:07 pm


Postby Midas » Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:45 pm

It's funny that Joey Q says that production values are what sells comics and there's no going back. Maybe that's true for new readers, but how many new readers can you attract at a $3.99 price point? I don't think the core audience is buying this argument.

For me, I've almost entirely given up on modern super-hero comics from Marvel and DC. I go where the stories are, production values be damned. That means I buy a lot of classic collected materials, including Essentials and Showcases, where the production values of the collected comics (if not also the collections) were lower than modern comics but the stories were better (not as decompressed, lots of new characters and ideas being introduced all the time, etc.). I also buy a lot of indy books. Finally, I find myself buying more and more manga, which are generally published in black and white on cheap paper (low production values). But the stories can be original and compelling and you get over 200 pages for about $10-$12. Marvel and DC have lost me.

kingbobb
User avatar
Great Scott!!!
 
Posts: 4806
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:01 am


Postby kingbobb » Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:24 pm

cncoyle wrote:Why do comics companies go with the ass-opposite approach to price increases as the USPS on stamps (who should really quit beating about the bush and increase by a whole nickel every five years instead of this penny crap)? Why not small incremental increases of a nickel here and ten cents there? A frickin' dollar is too much to ask a lot of consumers.


They used to do that...when their comics audience was mostly teenaged boys getting their books from the spinner racks, using their allowance/paper route/lawn-mowing/saved lunch money funds.

Then those kids grew up into, well, us, with jobs and stuff, mostly, who love our comics, and are willing to pay hefty monthly fees just to get them. They increase the price so much now because they feel they can.

Things are worth what people are willing to pay for them. Yes, I think it's collassally dumb to be thinking price increase right now for any other reason than critical cost increases. People are cutting back everywhere. Say you collect 10 books a month. At $3 a book, that's $30. Now they go to $4, and your income isn't increasing. Assuming you have to stay on a budget, you have to cut 3 books out of your collection, although you could probably pick one of those up in trades with the $2 a month extra you get.

Now that Marvel has control of their own movie arm, they should be using some of the Hollywood $ to keep the street price of their comics down. They're the best advertising vehicles they have for testing out potential future product.
Image

C20Percent
User avatar
rubber spoon
 
Posts: 6271
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:55 pm


Postby C20Percent » Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:31 pm

JL_Amato wrote:This.

The only title I'm really enjoying from DC right now is Secret Six.


That and Green Lantern. I have hope for John's Flash.

Apache Chef
User avatar
Expert Post Whore
 
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:48 pm


Postby Apache Chef » Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:57 pm

kingbobb wrote:Things are worth what people are willing to pay for them. Yes, I think it's collassally dumb to be thinking price increase right now for any other reason than critical cost increases. People are cutting back everywhere. Say you collect 10 books a month. At $3 a book, that's $30. Now they go to $4, and your income isn't increasing. Assuming you have to stay on a budget, you have to cut 3 books out of your collection, although you could probably pick one of those up in trades with the $2 a month extra you get.


You're right about people's budgets. I think what it'll lead to is the cancellation of a lot of lower selling, yet good, comics. Nova, Captain Britain, Agents of Atlas. Stuff like that. The average customer is going to want to keep reading the "important" stuff, and seeing as it's those very books that are going up in price, it doesn't leave much budget room for the little guy.

chap22
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 20629
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:08 pm
Location: Missi-by God-ssippi, a.k.a. Chapveria
Title: Pretentious curmudgeon


Postby chap22 » Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:57 pm

"And while some would like to argue that we should print on cheaper paper and use cheaper coloring, it doesn’t wash, because the minute we do that, we’ll notice a significant decline in readership and interest in comics."


i call HORSESHIT. i'm not saying go back to .25-cent comics, but if you drop the price a buck a pop or more, you will NOT lose a significant amount of readers due to the drop in fucking paper quality. for one thing, as others have mentioned, most comic readers today (and the number of us left ain't that big to begin with) are the lifers like me who are so ingrained in the system that we're willing to fork over 4 bucks now for some 5-minute piece of shit Bendis craps out with rehashed panels and talking heads. you really think cheaper paper and a decrease in price is gonna be the straw that breaks our back? not hardly, Quesadilla.

plus, if you make books actually affordable again, you may even pick up a few more kids with paper routes/allowances/etc if you put the books a) where they can readily find them and b) in a tax bracket they can afford. this is the demographic that's already not buying your product, so what is it gonna hurt you to try something new to change their minds? it ain't fucking rocket science, Joey Cheese.
Image
rdrsfn82 wrote:Chap is right.

john lewis wrote:I got nothing but respect for [Chap]

jsalwen wrote:You're the man, Chap.

DMM wrote:Chap knows what he's talking about.

MoneyMelon wrote:chap is right about pretty much everything

GOSD wrote:chap FTW!

Ntikrst wrote:Chap's right

oogy wrote:All those quotes in your sig ain't lying.

leave a comment with facebook

PreviousNext

Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FaceBook [Linkcheck], xaraan and 45 guests

Advertisement