Tuesday, October 17, 2017 • Midnight Edition • "Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke."
Advertisement
Patrick Zircher Only Person to Take Randy Queen's Side in DMCA Takedown Controversy
Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*
*Membership spots not really limited!
Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*
*Membership spots not really limited!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Exactly what I was going to suggest 
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
That was back in the days of Character Spotlight and Comics You Should Be Reading and things like that (by "things like that," I mean "still kissing corporate ass trying to curry favor with publishers"). Before the New News Initiative and snarky humor. |
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
I can see it now: The banner reads "Your work at Outhousers is puerile, unfunny, and sophomoric. The work is moronic." - Patrick Zircher It'd be like the late Maurice Sendak's quote for one of Colbert's books, "The sad thing is, I like it." Except, y'know...less meaningful. If the initial remarks about Randy Queen's work were anything like this (more insulting, antagonistic), I could see/understand Queen getting upset. I could see someone defending his actions (largely because I've encountered a lot of ass-wipes in my time, mostly but not exclusively online). But what Queen did was over the line, and at least he eventually admitted he was wrong (even if to a degree). However, if they were actual, insightful criticisms about the fundamentals of the image(s), and NOT insults like Zicher has delved to lobbing...then these jokers wouldn't have a leg to stand on if they paired up and used a dinette set.
If you listen closely, you can hear Dan Didio cover his ears and chant, "la-la, la-la! I am not list-en-ing! La-la, la-la!" |
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
Counter reset?
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
That was long after Bagley left it. |
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
Nope, that would require everyone accepting permissions or something and more code. |
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
I figured on the 'more code' part, but it was an interesting thought. 
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
Gail Simone is batshit insane. But then, given what she's worked on at DC and that she worked at DC...  Signed, a man often called catshit insane... behind his back... but I hear you. |
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
I agree, his art is actually good whenever I've seen it in the books I buy. But between this and the Waid thing he comes across as pretty arrogant. |
||
leave a comment with facebook
72 posts
• Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests
Follow Us
Ads:
| Advertisement |
|---|
|
|
