Advertisement

5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Discuss the latest comic book news and front page articles, read or post your own reviews of comics, and talk about anything comic book related. Threads from the two subforums below will also show up here. News Stand topics can also be read and posted in from The Asylum.

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

LOLtron
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 23407
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 4 posts
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 1:54 pm


5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby LOLtron » Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:10 pm

5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

As a #FireDidio hashtag gets some traction on Twitter, The Outhouse bucks the trends and comes to the beleaguered executive's defense!




Over at Bleeding Cool today, Rich Johnston posted a love letter to DC Comics Co-Publisher Dan Didio, which is itself in response to Twitter users who have been trying to get the hashtag #FireDidio trending. Though Johnston, like The Outhouse, has no problems calling DC out when they screw up, he seems to feel that the calls to get Dan the Man fired are taking things a little too far. He defends Dan's performance at DC as the only thing keeping its entire creative staff employed, and suggests that without Dan, the entire division would close down, its characters would be licensed out to Cambodian sweatshops, Uncle Billy would be in an insane asylum, and Harry would be dead since Dan wouldn't be there to save him from drowning. If Johnston is right, readers in a post-Didio world might soon be wishing they could take it all back.

 

A dramatization.

 

We asked Rich for comment on his claims, but he was too busy singing to himself and refused to answer.

"Rich and Dan, sittin' in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G," chirped Johnston as he carefully doodled hearts around Didio's name on his Trapper Keeper. "First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes Richie in the baby carriage. Pip pip!"

Here at The Outhouse, we never miss an opportunity to rip off one of Bleeding Cool's ideas and make it better, so we've compiled a list of the top 5.2 reasons Dan Didio should not be fired. Here they are:

1. He could be replaced by someone worse! Before Didio was Co-Publisher, he was Editor in Chief. DC's current Editor in Chief is Bob Harras. Do the math, people! Does anyone want to see Harras move up in the ranks? Dan Didio is the only thing standing between Bob Harras and the complete implosion of the comics industry, 90s style. He must stand firm, for the good of us all!

2. "Didio" lends itself to so many puns. Dan Dildo. The Didiot. Darth Didius. Fandom has been perfecting derogatory puns on Didio's name for over a decade now. Do you want all that work to go to waste? Do you want to start over at square one? What are we gonna go with? Geoff Jerkface? Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water, people.

3. We really like all the unique hits he brings us. Seriously, since The Outhouse became the de facto place to go to find out how DC has hilariously embarrassed themselves in public, we've been riding high on an unprecedented wave of web traffic, and the rest of the comics media, as much as they like to pretend they're above it all, has been doing the same. Do you want that to all go away? Do you want to end a creative renaissance for the comics blogosphere just to satisfy your thirst for vengeance?

Nevermind Dan's livelihood… think about the bloggers! We'd have nothing to write about. Do you really want us to have to bring back Idiot's Guide Weekly?

4. The old DCU ain't coming back. No matter how much you wish for it, DCE is not going to come around, two years later, 'admit' they were wrong, put things back to the way they were. Sales-wise, the reboot has been a success, and, in fact, reboots in general are a standard practice in the entertainment industry. You see the same kind of thinking about iconic characters and the 'illusion of change' at Marvel as well, and it reflects the attitude of pretty much all corporate intellectual property owners in the age of cross-branding and global marketing. Warner Bros. is not going to change their minds to suit the whims of a relatively small readership. There's much more money to made in movies and TV,  and the Batman franchise alone has been rebooted, what… four times now?

If you want to get rid of Dan because you think it'll bring back all that lost continuity you miss so much, you're going to end up very disappointed.

5. Just look at that face. Look at it!

Isn't he so cute? He's a cute Didio. Yes he is! Yes he is! You wouldn't want to see a sad Didio, would you? Would you?!

Awwww! Nobody wants to see that. Keep Dan around, and you'll keep Dan happy.

Much better.

5.1 The Didio regime ushered in the convention of 5.2 lists on the DC Blog. Before that, we would have had to come up with 10 reasons not to fire Didio, and, let's face it, that would have been a stretch. Thanks to Dan's arithmomaniac obsession with the number 52, there are three less reasons we need to come up with to make this list, and for that alone, Didio deserves to stay.

5.2 How much of this is really Dan's fault, anyway? Dan's job as Co-Publisher is to make sure that DC makes money publishing comics. Geoff Johns is the Chief Creative Officer. If you don't like the direction of the comics, shouldn't it be Johns we're all bitching about on the Twitter. Either way, it's beside the point. We doubt the blame for DC can be laid at the feet of any one person.

More likely than not, the editorial clusterfuck at DC is the result of a managerial clusterfuck at Warner Bros., and if heads haven't rolled yet, what makes anyone think they're going to now? If DC's parent company wasn't happy with the performance of DC after all this time, they would have changed things up by now. Instead, when DCE was formed, everyone in the current regime got a promotion, and they added Bob freaking Harras to boot.

Dan and the Gang are producing is exactly what WB is looking for, which in turn means that anyone brought on to replace Dan would be expected to implement those same strategies. Things would be unlikely to get any better. At least Dan seems to genuinely like comics, and seems like a fairly good-natured guy when he's not completely blowing it on Twitter.

Better the devil you know, and all that...



Written or Contributed by Terror, RU, and Copter


READ THIS ARTICLE ON THE FRONT PAGE, HUMANS!
Image

Advertisement

GHERU
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 38356
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 9 posts
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby GHERU » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:23 pm

sad Didio is sad
RUviews
Benderbrau wrote:Welcome to the Outhouse. Where civility means you're doing it wrong.

The Bass
 
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby The Bass » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:35 pm

Alternative to Didio: Tom DeFalco. Nuff said.

Chesscub
User avatar
WTF is this rank?
 
Posts: 11615
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:22 pm
Location: Dracut, MA
Title: Bear du jour


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby Chesscub » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:43 pm

Personally I'm betting the problem is Bob Harras. He rubbed a lot of people wrong in the 90s. Promote Mike Marts to EIC

Jack Burton
User avatar
biny little tird
 
Posts: 12178
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Braintree, MA


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby Jack Burton » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:46 pm

Rich's letter pissed me off the second he said I should be grateful for Marvel Now because of Didio.

I guess because of how DC fucked Nu52 is Marvel learned a lesson to how not do a reboot?

outsider
User avatar
Outhouse Drafter
 
Posts: 32756
Likes: 25 posts
Liked in: 12 posts
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 12:35 pm
Title: Absent
Formerly: Scantronman, _OM_ & cyclopsfan


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby outsider » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:54 pm

Not yet. Let's wait until the 2014 'event' reveals Wally West & Donna Troy as the villains.
Think of the entertainment value!
-

habitual
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 18051
Likes: 2 posts
Liked in: 4 posts
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:41 am
Location: The Rock of Eternity
Title: Habinger of Doom!


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby habitual » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:56 pm

If we're going to call you TRC, which one of you is wearing the condoms on his face?

Hab
Last edited by habitual on Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

PennyDreadful
A Quagmire
 
Posts: 18
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:11 am


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby PennyDreadful » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:57 pm

Just a note: DCE as we know it was founded and organized by Jeff Robinov, head of WB's film division. WB didn't even have a CEO for two years. Robinov was one of the people jockeying for that position. In the end, they hired Kevin Tsujihara, a friend of Paul Levitz and former head of WB's home entertainment division. Robinov has since been let go from the company, and Diane Nelson reports directly to Tsujihara. I'm hoping that as Tsujihara looks at DC's multimedia potential, he takes a good look at the comics division and how it's being run. The PR debacles and declining sales don't make DC look good.

Oh, and I realize that the old DCU isn't coming back, but over the next decade, I predict elements of the old DCU will trickle back in gradually. Maybe they'll make more use of the Multiverse and avoid stupid reboots in the future. (Assuming DC survives as a comic publisher, of course.)

PatricioUPMA
User avatar
Faster Pussycat
 
Posts: 3
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:41 am


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby PatricioUPMA » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:57 pm

No matter how much Richie wants it, the can't be a marriage. It would be against the Batwoman rule.

Mr. Log
User avatar
phrase IV
 
Posts: 5877
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 5 posts
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 12:43 am
Title: I'm starvin'!
Formerly: Log-Man


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby Mr. Log » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:59 pm

GHERU wrote:sad Didio is sad


sad Didio is terrifying

S.F. Jude Terror
User avatar
OMCTO
 
Posts: 74681
Likes: 24 posts
Liked in: 23 posts
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:44 pm
Location: Up Your Ass
Title: Webmaster Supreme
Formerly: Dr. Jude Terror


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:00 pm

The article is meant to be fun, of course, but while there's no doubt the reboot gave the industry a kick in the ass, two year later, the sales are just about back to where they were for DC, while sales in general are up. Of course, the Villains Month crap will likely see a huge boost in sales, encouraging that kind of gimmicky crap over substance. :(
Image
I LOVE BLUD BLOOD! - Rob Liefeld

S.F. Jude Terror
User avatar
OMCTO
 
Posts: 74681
Likes: 24 posts
Liked in: 23 posts
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:44 pm
Location: Up Your Ass
Title: Webmaster Supreme
Formerly: Dr. Jude Terror


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:01 pm

PatricioUPMA wrote:No matter how much Richie wants it, the can't be a marriage. It would be against the Batwoman rule.


:lol:
Image
I LOVE BLUD BLOOD! - Rob Liefeld

PatricioUPMA
User avatar
Faster Pussycat
 
Posts: 3
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:41 am


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby PatricioUPMA » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:01 pm

Log-Man wrote:
sad Didio is terrifying


Happy Didio is even worse...

The Bass
 
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby The Bass » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:01 pm

Chesscub wrote:Personally I'm betting the problem is Bob Harras. He rubbed a lot of people wrong in the 90s. Promote Mike Marts to EIC



Marts would be worse. He presided over the worst of the X-Men era at Marvel, and has let the Batman franchise sink to new levels of creative bankruptcy in his time at DC

adamiani
Naked, Greased-Up Deaf Guy
 
Posts: 91
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:55 pm


Re: 5.2 Reasons Not to Fire Dan Didio

Postby adamiani » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:01 pm

While it won't bring the DCU back, permitting some elements of it to return-- and a commitment to healing the damage gradually over time-- would go a long ways.

And, hey, this is DC. They do a major reality-warping continuity shift roughly every three years anyhow. Might as well let one of the things do something good for a change.

leave a comment with facebook

Next

Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media, TimH, uos spo6 and 71 guests

Advertisement