Monday, August 20, 2018 • Morning Edition • "We put the lotion in the basket."

The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

Comics news, comic book reviews, feature articles about comics, interviews with comic creators, plus the greatest comic book and pop culture discussion in the Outhouse forums!

Advertisement

Review Group Week #250: BATWOMAN #0

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Well, they're not accepting new members, but we'll take anyone here, so why not sign up for a free acount? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

User avatar

guitarsmashley

Regular-Sized Poster

Postby guitarsmashley » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:47 pm

Duck Punch wrote:Batwoman #0
Writer:
J.H. Williams III and J. Haden Blackman
Art: J.H. Williams III, Amy Reeder, Richard Friend, and Dave Stewart

To say that the last major appearance of Batwoman, Elegy, made an impression on people is kind of like saying that Yao Ming and Shaquille O'Neal are kind of tall. In other words, it would be a serious understatement. So when it was announced that Batwoman would finally be getting her own stand-alone series instead of piggy-backing in Detective Comics, there was much jubilation throughout the land.

Then it was announced that Greg Rucka, the man who wrote the aforementioned story, would not be involved in the writing of the new series and many, including myself, were suddenly left in doubt as to the future of this character that seemingly come from nowhere to be a tour de force in the world of Gotham City.

Then came the announcement that J.H. Williams III, the artist behind Elegy, was announced as the man who would be writing the new series and... well, I can't speak for other Batwoman fans, but for myself, I was left dubious. Yeah, the man is a magician when it comes to artwork, but can he write?

So this brings us to Batwoman #0, an issue clearly designed to bring new readers up to speed on the character (or at least enough to be able to jump in) and also a chance to see just what Williams can do without Rucka's writing. The answer? Somewhat surprising.

The newly returned Bruce Wayne is scoping Kate Kane out to determine if she is, in fact, Batwoman and whether or not she has a place in his new Batman Incorporated scheme. This takes the form of following her and her family using various disguises, as well as watching her do battle with her long-time enemies in the Religion of Crime. In much the same way as was done during the Bruce Wayne: The Road Home series of one-shots, he gives a point-by-point analysis of Kate, her motivations, and her performance. While acknowledging that she is not exactly the same as himself or any of the heroes that he had a direct hand in training, she is nonetheless more than capable of performing her mission.

At this point, the most outstanding element of this issue needs to be addressed: the artwork. Anyone who read Elegy knew that Williams more than had the chops to make this book look pretty, but even knowing what you are in for does not necessitate being unable to appreciate just how great something is. Williams in on his game in both the Batwoman and the Kate Kane scenes, with some help from Amy Reeder and Richard Friend to help bring some distinguishing between the two angles. But again, it's all about Williams and his layouts. The man can do things with a page that very few others can do and certainly not many working today.

Now that the elephant in the room is out of the way, there's the small matter of the story. Now, as I alluded to above, going into this I wasn't entirely convinced that Williams was going to be able to pull this off as a writer. And at the end of the day, I'm still not. While the story was entertaining and his juxtaposition of Bruce's following of her both in her role as Kate Kane and as Batwoman was well-executed, it didn't strike me as really selling anything. And to be blunt: this was a new-reader intro issue. Frankly, it didn't seem like anything in this issue would have been that difficult to mess up. I'm still unsure.

So at the end of the day, this is a gorgeous book. One of the best-looking books I've seen all year. But I'm still not 100% sold on whether or not the man responsible for that art can also carry the writing load, even with the assistance of a co-writer.

Art: 9.9 out of 10
Story: 6.8 out of 10
Overall Score: 8.35 out of 10


Williams writing is definitely the scariest part of this book.
User avatar

Amoebas

Son of Stein

Postby Amoebas » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:47 pm

Just realized my weekly Box O Comics is a day delayed. Won't have em til tomorrow. :-(
User avatar

guitarsmashley

Regular-Sized Poster

Postby guitarsmashley » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:48 pm

Amoebas wrote:Just realized my weekly Box O Comics is a day delayed. Won't have em til tomorrow. :-(


well aren't you Mr. Money Bags.
User avatar

Garofani Spruzzo

Rain Partier

Postby Garofani Spruzzo » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:53 pm

I would have preferred an actual story that informs the reader about the character through the narrative instead of this third person Show 'n' Tell dealie. Some of you are such easy marks for a bad comic drawn nicely--which explains Jeph Loeb's career, I guess. :smt011
User avatar

BlueStreak

The Red Stands for Irony

Postby BlueStreak » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:59 pm

Victorious Squid wrote:Did Thanksgiving affect the shipping schedule this week? Do I have to wait until Thursday for Supergod #5, AKA the only comic worth buying next week?


Yes.
User avatar

Garofani Spruzzo

Rain Partier

Postby Garofani Spruzzo » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:03 pm

BlueStreak wrote:
Yes.

Image
User avatar

guitarsmashley

Regular-Sized Poster

Postby guitarsmashley » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:19 pm

Victorious Squid wrote:Image


I can lend you a copy of Ultimates Vol 3. It's probably just as good.
User avatar

Garofani Spruzzo

Rain Partier

Postby Garofani Spruzzo » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:44 pm

guitarsmashley wrote:
I can lend you a copy of Ultimates Vol 3. It's probably just as good.

Image
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:55 pm

Wow is this the first time the Review Group has gotten reported? Long live BlueStreak!
User avatar

S.F. Jude Terror

OMCTO

Postby S.F. Jude Terror » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:57 pm

Victorious Squid wrote:
Still not interested though!

I'll try to Byrne it though. No way am I shelling out cash for that.


What are you talking about? You don't need to Byrne it, that's the whole story. You can pretty much review based on that, maybe glance at the art.
User avatar

Garofani Spruzzo

Rain Partier

Postby Garofani Spruzzo » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:58 pm

Jude Terror wrote:Wow is this the first time the Review Group has gotten reported? Long live BlueStreak!


We used to hit 20 pages at least before even Starlord stepped in to attempt to moderate and then storm out. :-(
User avatar

Garofani Spruzzo

Rain Partier

Postby Garofani Spruzzo » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:58 pm

Jude Terror wrote:
What are you talking about? You don't need to Byrne it, that's the whole story. You can pretty much review based on that, maybe glance at the art.


Who the hell is Dakota, anyway?
User avatar

BlueStreak

The Red Stands for Irony

Postby BlueStreak » Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:08 pm

Jude Terror wrote:Wow is this the first time the Review Group has gotten reported? Long live BlueStreak!


Boom. New members, new drama, new danger. It's the All-New, Not So Different Review Group!
User avatar

GHERU

Rain Partier

Postby GHERU » Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:36 pm

Jude Terror wrote:Wow is this the first time the Review Group has gotten reported? Long live BlueStreak!

Sadly, no
And I am still sorry about that
User avatar

Garofani Spruzzo

Rain Partier

Postby Garofani Spruzzo » Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:39 pm

I'm going to report Jude for spamming us with his reviews of things he got free in the mail.

leave a comment with facebook


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests