Punchy wrote:
I don't do that, I'm just generally not as negative.
The truth is, most of you are way too harsh.
There were panels in this comic that I could easily replicate with crayons. Combine that with a total lack of editing (and I'm talking about blatant mistakes that could/should have been easily corrected via a thirty second google search) and this book is getting exactly what it deserves.
I think Bendis is a great writer, but he only forms one-third of the ingredients to make a proper comic. Art and editing is needed as well. This book has neither.