The Outhouse - The Greatest Comic Book Forum

by **Zero** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:28 am

When you two meet up, the grudge fucking is going to be epic.

by ****** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:29 am

Punchy wrote:
Because I can't be bothered at this moment and I don't want to give him the satisfaction.

But you'll argue with him about 'various and sundry' for 2 hours. Ooooookay.

by **thefourthman** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:29 am

BlueStreak wrote:I've put up a new thread....

don't go and be all tyrannical now bitch, we is using this one.

by **Punchy** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:30 am

John Snow wrote:
But you'll argue with him about 'various and sundry' for 2 hours. Ooooookay.

I can argue about 'various and sundry' whilst doing other things. I have to concentrate to write a review.

by ****** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:30 am

BlueStreak wrote:I've put up a new thread....

Good gawd man, don't encourage them to move this there. There's still hope we can keep the McKeever/Norton reunion thread from sucking.

by **thefourthman** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:31 am

John Snow wrote:
But you'll argue with him about 'various and sundry' for 2 hours. Ooooookay.

by ****** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:32 am

Punchy wrote:
I can argue about 'various and sundry' whilst doing other things. I have to concentrate to write a review.

All anyone is going to read is the score and the quote. You don't actually need to put that much work into it.

by **thefourthman** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:33 am

John Snow wrote:
All anyone is going to read is the score and the quote. You don't actually need to put that much work into it.

I want a 800 page in depth analysis, fucknut.

by **thefourthman** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:34 am

preferably with annotations and a concordance.

by **Punchy** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:37 am

John Snow wrote:
All anyone is going to read is the score and the quote. You don't actually need to put that much work into it.

I like to put effort in, and when my opinion on Batwoman is so different from the consensus, I'd need to explain myself properly lest somebody gets the wrong end of the stick. Yes, I could just go:

"This sucks, Batwoman has no personality beyond her sexuality and is generic. JH Williams' art is overly-elaborate and confuses the story. 3/10"

But I like to put more into it than that.

by **thefourthman** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:39 am

Punchy wrote:
I like to put effort in, and when my opinion on Batwoman is so different from the consensus, I'd need to explain myself properly lest somebody gets the wrong end of the stick. Yes, I could just go:

"This sucks, Batwoman has no personality beyond her sexuality and is generic. JH Williams' art is overly-elaborate and confuses the story. 3/10"

But I like to put more into it than that.

And well you should, that review doesn't show that you read the book as it states the same you felt about it before hand and does not acknowledge the other artist on the book.

Hence the reason I need an epic Punchy review that would end all reviews.

by **thefourthman** » Wed May 11, 2011 9:41 am

Also, I fail to see how a well thought out review showing that you have read the book and it confirms your earlier suspicions about the book would be giving me satisfaction.

by **Stephen Day** » Thu May 12, 2011 5:16 pm

thefourthman wrote:I need an invitation now?

Apparently not. :roll:

by **Stephen Day** » Thu May 12, 2011 5:25 pm

thefourthman wrote:

Considering that you were arguing right along with him, I doth think you laughing here is equivalent to the pot calling the kettle black.

by **Victorian Squid** » Thu May 12, 2011 5:48 pm

Stephen Day wrote:
Considering that you were arguing right along with him, I doth think you laughing here is equivalent to the pot calling the kettle black.

African-American. The pot and the kettle are African-American, Stephen.