Advertisement

The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

[ Facebook comments]

Discuss the latest comic book news, read previews and reviews of upcoming and recent comic books, talk about comics, vote on your favorites, and more!

The New 52? Overall, is it good or bad?

Good
26
62%
Bad
13
31%
Watchmen is overrated
3
7%
 
Total votes : 42

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

Cat-Scratch
User avatar
A Damn Cuddly Beast
 
Posts: 60620
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\


Online


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby Cat-Scratch » Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:49 pm

nietoperz wrote:
Scott Snyder has said on Twitter that he has Batman plotted out past the arc that will begin in #20. Two years does not signify temporariness in my book...


Yeah, we saw how things went for Grant Morrison.

Batman - The DCU changes but he really doesn't.
Image
Strict31 wrote:To quote Hunter S. Thompson, there is nothing more despicable than a cat in the depths of a nip binge..
Strict31 wrote:Listen to Feline Mussolini.
Strict31 wrote:You're goddamned insane.
achilles wrote:Pay no attention to Cat-Scratch people; he's insane from all that cat-nip.
Lord Simian wrote:"Us"? This is YOUR Kongdamn fault, mister "Bets on when this place will break again"....
Psivage wrote:Don't trust a cat. They are always up to no good.
Ragnascratch is coming... maybe.
/人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\

Advertisement

Cat-Scratch
User avatar
A Damn Cuddly Beast
 
Posts: 60620
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canadah
Formerly: /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\


Online


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby Cat-Scratch » Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:50 pm

SaturnKnight wrote:
I honestly don't think so. If there's any big changes for DC franchises on the horizon, it's with WB's movies. That will be where the next big sweeping changes happen in terms of story direction and visuals.


Sorry, but seeing that they put in a big escape hatch with this at the end of Flashpoint to make the whole thing... don't hold your breath.
Image
Strict31 wrote:To quote Hunter S. Thompson, there is nothing more despicable than a cat in the depths of a nip binge..
Strict31 wrote:Listen to Feline Mussolini.
Strict31 wrote:You're goddamned insane.
achilles wrote:Pay no attention to Cat-Scratch people; he's insane from all that cat-nip.
Lord Simian wrote:"Us"? This is YOUR Kongdamn fault, mister "Bets on when this place will break again"....
Psivage wrote:Don't trust a cat. They are always up to no good.
Ragnascratch is coming... maybe.
/人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\

SaturnKnight
User avatar
dINGO
 
Posts: 3028
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:15 pm


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby SaturnKnight » Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:58 pm

Cat-Scratch wrote:
Sorry, but seeing that they put in a big escape hatch with this at the end of Flashpoint to make the whole thing... don't hold your breath.


Nah. I don't think so. Pandora seems to me to be the lynchpin for Morrison's long-promised Multiversity.

And there's no reason for them to go back when sales are way up and they've cockblocked Marvel out of the Top 10.
Image

rdrsfn82
User avatar
Wrasslin' Fan
 
Posts: 32348
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:46 pm
Location: Reno, NV


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby rdrsfn82 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:01 pm

If sales start dropping, they can do just as big an event by returning to the real DCU and doing some giant story about that.

Especially if it involved some big milestone numbers for Detective or Action or Batman or whatever.
Image

rdrsfn82
User avatar
Wrasslin' Fan
 
Posts: 32348
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:46 pm
Location: Reno, NV


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby rdrsfn82 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:01 pm

Plus, you'd just say that was the greatest move ever and that the return is brilliant.
Image

SaturnKnight
User avatar
dINGO
 
Posts: 3028
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:15 pm


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby SaturnKnight » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:05 pm

rdrsfn82 wrote:If sales start dropping, they can do just as big an event by returning to the real DCU and doing some giant story about that.

Especially if it involved some big milestone numbers for Detective or Action or Batman or whatever.


Oh yeah. That wouldn't surprise me. But that's if sales go down. How long can DC maintain their sales dominance?

I have high hopes. :-D

EDIT: Personally, *I* wouldn't call it brilliant. And I'd rather they didn't go back. I'm happy with what we've got.
Image

e_galston
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 17853
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:38 pm
Location: Eastern Shore of MD
Formerly: Sitebreaker


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby e_galston » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:10 pm

Overall i'd say its good, but i'm still way more impressed with Marvel then i am with DC.
Image

Dragavon
User avatar
Podcaster
 
Posts: 18604
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:35 am
Location: NJ
Title: Married
Formerly: Ben Reilly


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby Dragavon » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:12 pm

SaturnKnight wrote:
Oh, hell no. Sorry, nothing personal. But take away Daredevil and Captain America and the mountains of crap coming out of Marvel these days is astounding. I mean, Avengers Vs. X-Men? That's their big "new" idea? Seriously? :roll:

You are biased.

Amazing Spider-Man, Avengers, Avengers Academy, Avengers: The Children's Crusade, Captain America, Daredevil, Defenders, Hulk, Incredible Hulk, Journey into Mystery, New Avengers, New Mutants, Scarlet Spider, Secret Avengers, Mighty Thor, Punisher, Thunderbolts, Uncanny X-Force, Venom, Winter Soldier and Wolverine are all good titles.

You are focusing on AvX because it's not out yet and you don't like the concept.

Marvel has on average better writers than DC which still has people like Lobdell, Daniels, McDaniels, Higgins, Wallace, Glass, Krul and Van Sciver writing.
Image

GHERU
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 36379
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Fucking Akron


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby GHERU » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:12 pm

SaturnKnight wrote:
Actually, DC held the #1 spot on the Diamond charts for 3 months in a row--a full quarter. Then Marvel came back in December, but lost both Unit Share and the whole Top Ten to DC the following month. That's more than a month or two.

And I'm definitely not the only one who loves Manapul & Buccellato's Flash. Plus, it's getting 4 star reviews on multiple sites.

Its not the best the Flash has ever been, but it is the best it can be with Barry
RUviews
Benderbrau wrote:Welcome to the Outhouse. Where civility means you're doing it wrong.

MoneyMelon
User avatar
Chief Yankee Wanker
 
Posts: 26403
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 10:02 pm
Title: Internet Celebrity


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby MoneyMelon » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:49 pm

I think it's a mixed bag. Some of it is really good (Batman, Swamp Thing, Wonder Woman, etc) and some if it is absolutely terrible (Teen Titans, Green Arrow, Hawkman).

The one thing that I still don't understand is why a complete continuity reboot was necessary. I feel like the good books are more or less consistent with pre-Flashpoint stuff and any of the stuff where they reset continuity isn't very good.

I like that they're taking some chances on stuff like Swamp Thing and Animal Man but again, did they need to reset continuity to do this? I feel like they could easily have done these pre-Flashpoint. And I like that they're integrating the Wildstorm stuff into the regular DCU, although the execution leaves something to be desired particularly on Stormwatch. But at the same time, I miss books like Secret Six and Booster Gold.

I also think it's become very apparent that DC simply doesn't have the depth in creators to put out 52 high quality books. There's good stuff and then there's about a third of the line that's just crappy filler.

So to sum up my feelings, I think DC is better than it was 7 months ago but that's because they put good writers with good ideas on a number of their books. Not because of continuity changes.
Image

Man of Steel wrote:get over myself? You're the one who fancies himself some sort of internet celebrity.

mrorangesoda
User avatar
FROGMAN
 
Posts: 8663
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:20 am
Title: Be the leaf


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby mrorangesoda » Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:41 pm

The reason for the continuity changes is to back up the "new reader friendly" marketing (actually returning readers, but that's neither here nor there).

Juan Cena
User avatar
DANG!
 
Posts: 29596
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:03 pm
Location: Nacirema
Title: The Lyrical Peyton Manning


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby Juan Cena » Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:21 am

mrorangesoda wrote:The reason for the continuity changes is to back up the "new reader friendly" marketing (actually returning readers, but that's neither here nor there).


Doing more to get comics into places new readers actually show would be making them "new reader friendly."
Image

"I have my heroes, but no one knows their names"
- Sons of the Desert

Strict31 wrote:I'm not sure that combining the nigh-uncontrollable power of LOLtron with the Nacireman is a good idea. Some years from now, when mankind is on the verge of extinction, we'll be able to look back and remember this moment, and say, "DANG."


http://www.shirtswithrandomtriangles.com/

Check out Christmas in Nacirema
http://www.pandora.com/?sc=sh619160960893481469&shareImp=true#!/stations/play/619160960893481469

Starlord
User avatar
Outhouse Editor
 
Posts: 34548
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: Michigan


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby Starlord » Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:55 am

Zero wrote:
But that's also true of Marvel, Image, Dark Horse and IDW. Hell it's true of movies, albums, books, tv shows and cups of coffee. 'Some is great, but it's mostly shit' applies to the entirety of existence.


I agree with this statement but with the realization that one person's favorite book could very well be another's piece of shit. It's all subjective. Except for Grayson's run on Nightwing and everything Bendis does...







that last one was a joke. :wink:
Image

Max Blyss wrote:Months and months and months and the whole thing is still just an intersection at Dipshit Lane & Chip on my Shoulder Ave.

Starlord
User avatar
Outhouse Editor
 
Posts: 34548
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: Michigan


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby Starlord » Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:58 am

MoneyMelon wrote:I think it's a mixed bag. Some of it is really good (Batman, Swamp Thing, Wonder Woman, etc) and some if it is absolutely terrible (Teen Titans, Green Arrow, Hawkman).

The one thing that I still don't understand is why a complete continuity reboot was necessary. I feel like the good books are more or less consistent with pre-Flashpoint stuff and any of the stuff where they reset continuity isn't very good.

I like that they're taking some chances on stuff like Swamp Thing and Animal Man but again, did they need to reset continuity to do this? I feel like they could easily have done these pre-Flashpoint. And I like that they're integrating the Wildstorm stuff into the regular DCU, although the execution leaves something to be desired particularly on Stormwatch. But at the same time, I miss books like Secret Six and Booster Gold.

I also think it's become very apparent that DC simply doesn't have the depth in creators to put out 52 high quality books. There's good stuff and then there's about a third of the line that's just crappy filler.

So to sum up my feelings, I think DC is better than it was 7 months ago but that's because they put good writers with good ideas on a number of their books. Not because of continuity changes.



This. And it cracks me up that in the GL books they talk about Batman and Supes like they've known them for years but then you go to the new JL book and they are meeting each other for the first time.

I honestly think that is some piss poor storytelling. I'm happy DC is hitting a new high. But the stuff that changed post Flashpoint really seems to be the crap that sucks. :smt102
Image

Max Blyss wrote:Months and months and months and the whole thing is still just an intersection at Dipshit Lane & Chip on my Shoulder Ave.

Greg
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 22042
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:17 pm
Title: AKA The Hidden Hands of Horror


Re: The New 52: Six Months On, your overall thoughts.

Postby Greg » Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:59 am

I thought JLA was taking place 5 years in the past before the other books?
Image
*Sig by Cat-Scratch!

CountD: Greg, thank you for your insights.
Benderbrau: Greg: Unwrapping the riddles of the black man since 2006

Starlord: I swear if you were gay and I wasn't married we'd make the perfect fuck buddies.

Greg: I'd do many things. Coke is not one of them.
Benderbrau: Greg hates all things white.

Benderbrau: Emma, you could learn a thing or two from Greg. Greg does threesomes. That's bi done right.

leave a comment with facebook

PreviousNext

Return to The News Stand



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Herald and 67 guests

Advertisement