So he was vacationed for making a post that someone who the post wasn't even directed at got offended by?
Now I'm doubly confused.
all joking aside, the mawds take a harder look at stuff that has been reported. I do not remember it ever being the case that the person who was “attacked” had to be the one that was offended enough to report a post, nor do they actually have to care about the post in question.
I don’t think what avengingtitan wrote was report worthy, but bk did, and that is his prerogative. The mawds job is to look at what was said, past history, and other factors to see if action should be taken. IMO, no one was out of line – I disagree with the outcome, but I don’t think the process was flawed