Advertisement

Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

[ Facebook comments]

Talk about news, politics, pop culture, entertainment and everything geek with your fellow comic book fans!

Hey you! Reader! Want to be a part of the GREATEST COMIC BOOK AND GEEK COMMUNITY on the web?! Logged in users see WAY LESS ADS, so why not register? It's fast and it's easy, like your mom! Sign up today! Membership spots are limited!*

*Membership spots not really limited!

Doc Jon
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 28775
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:51 pm
Location: Jersey
Formerly: Doc Spider


Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby Doc Jon » Sun May 06, 2012 12:31 pm

Yes, they have the animated series (set to end after Season 2).

But we all know there will be another animated series that will follow that. Avengers is obviously already a juggernaut franchise.

They can't (and shouldn't) really do a live action Avengers series. The budget and so on just wouldn't work. But with a few tweaks to the lineup, should Disney/Marvel consider a Young Avengers tv series? I guess you could say it would be a la Smallville, but I certainly would hope for a different tone.

Most of the members can be done without outrageous special effects budgets. I think Wiccan could be done with a modest budget, depending on the spell effects. Stature would be a challenge and so would Hulkling, but maybe the characters could be tweaked a little.

So thoughts?

It would probably be a great way to attract more of the tweeny set into the Avengers.
Image


HJJOUNB SAWLWEN HATES MEO!!!! -Royal

Advertisement

Punchy
User avatar
Staff Writer
 
Posts: 31594
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:27 am
Location: UK
Title: Shitlord



HNutz
User avatar
WTF is this rank?
 
Posts: 11214
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:22 pm


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby HNutz » Sun May 06, 2012 4:58 pm

Depends on how it's done, I suppose.

ThatGuyRoman
User avatar
dINGO
 
Posts: 3136
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:42 pm
Title: That Guy, Roman.


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby ThatGuyRoman » Sun May 06, 2012 4:58 pm

Yes. Please. They really have bungled how they've handled that franchise. (Heinberg is no innocent party in that either...)

Log-Man
User avatar
Great Scott!!!
 
Posts: 4491
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 1:43 am
Title: Cruel cruel cruel


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby Log-Man » Sun May 06, 2012 5:22 pm

I don't see a live action series working. I would love to be proven wrong, though.

HNutz
User avatar
WTF is this rank?
 
Posts: 11214
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:22 pm


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby HNutz » Sun May 06, 2012 5:40 pm

Why not an animated series?

Psivage
User avatar
FROGMAN
 
Posts: 8015
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:05 pm
Title: shake it baby, shake it good!
Formerly: Cat-Psivage


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby Psivage » Sun May 06, 2012 5:40 pm

I would like an ongoing series at first. With a alive again Stature and rebulid Vision with Scott Lang as a mentor.
Image


Image

both made by Cat-Scratch

Juan Cena
User avatar
DANG!
 
Posts: 29502
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:03 pm
Location: Nacirema
Title: The Lyrical Peyton Manning


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby Juan Cena » Sun May 06, 2012 5:54 pm

Log-Man wrote:I don't see a live action series working. I would love to be proven wrong, though.


Same here. Probably too expensive.
Image

"I have my heroes, but no one knows their names"
- Sons of the Desert

Strict31 wrote:I'm not sure that combining the nigh-uncontrollable power of LOLtron with the Nacireman is a good idea. Some years from now, when mankind is on the verge of extinction, we'll be able to look back and remember this moment, and say, "DANG."


http://www.shirtswithrandomtriangles.com/

Check out Christmas in Nacirema
http://www.pandora.com/?sc=sh619160960893481469&shareImp=true#!/stations/play/619160960893481469

MistaT
User avatar
penile prisoner
 
Posts: 7468
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:48 pm
Location: Duval
Title: ThreadKilla


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby MistaT » Sun May 06, 2012 6:10 pm

No. I don't think that live action television is a suitable medium for comic characters.

habitual
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 15768
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 2:41 am
Location: The Rock of Eternity
Title: Habinger of Doom!


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby habitual » Sun May 06, 2012 8:28 pm

I'd much rather see Thunderbolts.

For whatever reason Marvel doesn't have the same problem DC does producing their major properties on TV.

Hab

habitual
User avatar
YOU WILL NEED A NURSE
 
Posts: 15768
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 2:41 am
Location: The Rock of Eternity
Title: Habinger of Doom!


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby habitual » Sun May 06, 2012 8:28 pm

MistaT wrote:No. I don't think that live action television is a suitable medium for comic characters.


Why? Some have been wildly popular.

Hab

Dragavon
User avatar
Podcaster
 
Posts: 18604
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:35 am
Location: NJ
Title: Married
Formerly: Ben Reilly


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby Dragavon » Sun May 06, 2012 9:06 pm

You know what properties would work better as live action TV series?

Daredevil. Power Man and Iron Fist. Alias. Moon Knight.
Image

MistaT
User avatar
penile prisoner
 
Posts: 7468
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:48 pm
Location: Duval
Title: ThreadKilla


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby MistaT » Sun May 06, 2012 9:28 pm

habitual wrote:
Why? Some have been wildly popular.

Hab


Budget constraints is a big one, it would limit everything from special effects to wardrobe to talent (both in front of and behind the camera).

But I think the biggest factor would be lack of vision. Arguably the most important man involved in the Avengers franchise and its supporting films is Kevin Feige. The man a had vision and a plan to execute it. Without him we would not be having this conversation. TV while similar on the surface is a whole different animal underneath. Decisions are made by committee's and big wigs who are not in it for the story or the characters but the advertising and the profit margin. I understand that this also applies to movies as well but the big difference is control. When a movie company signs off on a project it is handed over to the producer who is more or less the boss from that point on. Again that producer still has to answer to his higher ups, but when it comes to the Marvel productions I think Kevin is given a lot more leeway than others mainly because they understand how important that control is. One of the reasons that Marvel created its own studio was maintain control over its franchises. In television there would be too many fingers in the pot.

Smallville would be the exception to this rule, but even it in the end faltered. But it did have a decent run. When it comes down to it, I just wouldn't trust TV executives to handle these characters with the respect and care that I would want or expect them to.

Stephen Day
User avatar
Wrasslin' Fan
 
Posts: 27448
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Canada
Title: Maple Leaf Ninja


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby Stephen Day » Sun May 06, 2012 9:38 pm

MistaT wrote:
Budget constraints is a big one, it would limit everything from special effects to wardrobe to talent (both in front of and behind the camera).

But I think the biggest factor would be lack of vision. Arguably the most important man involved in the Avengers franchise and its supporting films is Kevin Feige. The man a had vision and a plan to execute it. Without him we would not be having this conversation. TV while similar on the surface is a whole different animal underneath. Decisions are made by committee's and big wigs who are not in it for the story or the characters but the advertising and the profit margin. I understand that this also applies to movies as well but the big difference is control. When a movie company signs off on a project it is handed over to the producer who is more or less the boss from that point on. Again that producer still has to answer to his higher ups, but when it comes to the Marvel productions I think Kevin is given a lot more leeway than others mainly because they understand how important that control is. One of the reasons that Marvel created its own studio was maintain control over its franchises. In television there would be too many fingers in the pot.

Smallville would be the exception to this rule, but even it in the end faltered. But it did have a decent run. When it comes down to it, I just wouldn't trust TV executives to handle these characters with the respect and care that I would want or expect them to.


I see your point, but I do have to point out that Game of Thrones proves that this doesn't necessarily have to be the case.
Image

Thank you Troy for the sig

MistaT
User avatar
penile prisoner
 
Posts: 7468
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:48 pm
Location: Duval
Title: ThreadKilla


Re: Should Marvel now consider a Young Avengers tv series?

Postby MistaT » Sun May 06, 2012 9:47 pm

Stephen Day wrote:
I see your point, but I do have to point out that Game of Thrones proves that this doesn't necessarily have to be the case.


Premium channels are a whole lot different from network or cable channels. The operate more like a movie studio than a television one. The exception in this case would be AMC, but they get it. They even say it in their slogan, "Where Story Matters" and because of that mindset they have given us the best shows on the air with The Walking Dead, Breaking Bad, and Mad Men.

leave a comment with facebook

Next

Return to The Asylum



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FaceBook [Linkcheck] and 32 guests

Advertisement