Wednesday, November 22, 2017 • Midnight Edition • "At least we're not ComicsAlliance!"

In Wake of Frank Cho Censorship Scandal, Political Science Professor Explains Censorship

Written by Jude Terror on Thursday, July 14 2016 and posted in News with Benefits

In Wake of Frank Cho Censorship Scandal, Political Science Professor Explains Censorship

The Outhouse feels it's important to educate people on the issues.



With the departure of artist Frank Cho from the role of Variant Cover Artist for DC's Wonder Woman comics, the internet is currently engaged in a heated debate over the meaning of censorship. Is it censorship for a company to request changes to the cover of a comic book from a work-for-hire artist? No one seems to know, but Frank Cho sure thinks it is, telling Bleeding Cool:

Greg Rucka thought my Wonder Woman #3 cover was vulgar and showed too much skin, and has been spearheading censorship, which is baffling since my Wonder Woman image is on model and shows the same amount of skin as the interior art, and it's a VARIANT COVER and he should have no editorial control over it. (But he does. WTF?!!!)

 

We thought it would be a good idea to, once and for all, get to the bottom of this important issue. Here to explain censorship to us is Professor of Censorship of Mass-Produced Consumer Products by the Companies that Make Them, from the prestigious Trump University, Thaddeus T. Puffinbottoms.

"Censorship is a complicated issue," Puffinbottoms explained, "which can most accurately be summed up as: if you don't like the decision, it's censorship."

Wow! Really?

"Absolutely," Puffinbottoms continued. "Comic book artists have an undeniable right to produce whatever they want, and comic book publishers have a responsibility to publish it completely unchanged, or else they are engaging in censorship. You can't censor art."

But comic books aren't necessarily art in and of themselves. They're commercial products that consist of art, mass produced and sold for profit. When it comes to work-for-hire comics produced by major corporations, they're often produced under guidelines from the company's editorial and marketing departments, and are subject to changes which may alter the story, the art, or both, as contractually agreed upon by all parties. Declining to publish a cover on a comic book that the company feels would be detrimental toward their long term goal of making a profit, no matter the reason, doesn't prohibit the artist from creating the art. That's not censorship; it's business.

"No," Puffinbottoms told us. "It's censorship."

You're sure you're a real professor?

"Are you trying to censor my academic credentials?!" Puffinbottoms asked, indignant.

Okay, okay. So comic book publishers have to publish whatever the artist gives them, regardless of whether they feel it's in their interest to do so, even if the artist just photocopied their butt onto a sheet of paper, or else they're censoring the artist?

"Yes," Puffinbottoms confirmed.

So if Frank Cho wants to draw a Wonder Woman panty shot on the cover of a book where the writer of the book, Greg Rucka, doesn't feel it's appropriate, and the writer asks for some changes to be made, and the publisher crops the panty shot off of the cover, that's an instance of the publisher, DC Comics, engaging in censorship?

Censorship.jpg

Before/After Censorship

"Of course not!" Puffinbottoms replied.

Phew! Okay because this was getting pretty cra--

"It's an instance of both DC Comics *and* Greg Rucka engaging in censorship," he interrupted.

Seriously?

"Comic book art of women's butts and boobs is one of the most important examples of First Amendment rights," Puffinbottoms explained. "That right shall not be infringed upon."

Sure. No one should tell you that you can't make that art. But the First Amendment doesn't say that someone else has to publish and promote it, right?

"Wrong," Puffinbottoms said. "As former president and author of the Constitution, Patrick Henry, once said, 'Give me an upskirt shot of a popular female superhero, or give me death.' I believe, like a lot of Constitutional scholars, that the intent of the original authors needs to be considered when interpreting this important document."

PartickHenry.jpg

Founding Father Patrick Henry

But Patrick Henry didn't... there's so much wrong with that, we don't know where to start.

"Furthermore, it clearly says right there that the censorship is ten times worse if the people calling for the censorship are SJWs," he added.

What?! That dumb term wasn't even invented until like last year!

"Are you arguing with the founding fathers?! The Congrefs of the United States?" demanded Professor Puffinbottoms. "Don't you love America?!"

We didn't say that!

congrefs.jpg

Document written by the "Congrefs" of the United States

"Then you agree that Frank Cho is the victim of censorship most foul!" he concluded.

That's not--

"Case closed," declared Puffinbottoms, crossing his arms.

 

Someone should really look into filing a lawsuit against the university that gave this guy a diploma.





Loading...

Help spread the word, loyal readers! Share this story on social media:



Comment without an Outhouse Account using Facebook

We get it. You don't feel like signing up for an Outhouse account, even though it's FREE and EASY! That's okay. You can comment with your Facebook account below and we'll take care of adding it to the stream above. But you really should consider getting a full Outhouse account, which will allow you to quote posts, choose an avatar and sig, and comment on our forums too. If that sounds good to you, sign up for an Outhouse account by clicking here.

Note: while you are welcome to speak your mind freely on any topic, we do ask that you keep discussion civil between each other. Nasty personal attacks against other commenters is strongly discouraged. Thanks!
Help spread the word, loyal readers! Share this story on social media:

About the Author - Jude Terror


Jude Terror is the Webmaster Supreme of The Outhouse and a sarcastic ace reporter dedicated to delivering irreverent comics and entertainment news to The Outhouse's dozens of loyal readers. Driven by a quest for vengeance, Jude Terror taught himself to program and joined The Outhouse. He instantly began working toward his goal of forcing the internet comics community to take itself less seriously and failing miserably. A certified trash eater ruining the pristine field of comics journalism with his sarcasm and goofiness, Jude Terror is secretly friendly and congenial, so if you've got a complaint, why not just bring it up to him instead of subtweeting like a jackass, jackass? You can find him on Twitter or try your luck with an email, but keep in mind that he is notoriously unreliable and may not get back to you right away. Unless you want to send him free stuff, in which case he'll get back to you immediately.


More articles from Jude Terror
The Outhouse is not responsible for any butthurt incurred by reading this website. All original content copyright the author. Banner by Ali Jaffery - he's available for commission!